fentonsbrainchild
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2019
- 1,037
- 548
Askarov will be gone before 10. I’m not sure how we’d get a 2nd pick in the top ten regardless of the fact we probably wouldn’t/shouldn’t use it on him
The problem is, the ones with the most trade value should be part of the team's solution. Trading them away just for late 1st round picks isn't going to move the needle anytime soon (if ever).
I've said it before, I'll say it again.
I will NEVER be in favor of a 1st round pick being a goaltender.
One of Koivu or Staal will still be here next year. Does that make them part of the solution? No. It makes them a place holder for a longer term option at this point.Is Koivu really part of the team's solution? Is Staal? Brodin? Dubnyk? Zucker? Who is part of the team's solution that would net us a first?
One of Koivu or Staal will still be here next year. Does that make them part of the solution? No. It makes them a place holder for a longer term option at this point.
Staal is the the more likely traded because Koivu has to be willing to move because he has a NMC... not a guarantee.
We can't afford to move both Staal and Koivu both, because we're not at all likely to be able to reasonably fill 2 top 6 center positions.
No we shouldn't, and no I don't.If we get a 1st for Koivu and a 1st for Staal, we should move them. Hell if we get a 2nd for Koivu and a 2nd for Staal we should move them.
As for affording? Don't you want to tank? We have Ek, and there are some really intriguing names on the market: Backstrom, RNH, Galchenyk, Namestnikov, Haula, Janmark, Brassard...
No we shouldn't, and no I don't.
We should be trying to get our players to play as good as they can, as many will be here next year, and next year we will need one of Koivu or Staal in our top 6.So, we should be trying for the playoffs? Also Koivu is a FA at the end of the year. Staal has another year. Koivu is easier to move than Staal if you make him waive his NMC.
What's the plan for the $20m cap recapture penalty we expose ourselves to by trading Parise?im in favor of moving the kitchen sink aka staal ; koivu; zuccarello; parise ; dubnyk; stalock; pateryn ; Hartman ; buyout or trade rask with 50% retention. picks; picks & more picks. i think we need to get younger faster stronger by drafting & maybe even signing a ufa or 2. maybe hall wants to play alongside kaprizov?
Trade everybody again to become cap compliant obviously. No other choice.What's the plan for the $20m cap recapture penalty we expose ourselves to by trading Parise?
Hartman has been one of the brighter spots on this team this year. He brings much needed grit I'd keep him around.im in favor of moving the kitchen sink aka staal ; koivu; zuccarello; parise ; dubnyk; stalock; pateryn ; Hartman ; buyout or trade rask with 50% retention. picks; picks & more picks. i think we need to get younger faster stronger by drafting & maybe even signing a ufa or 2. maybe hall wants to play alongside kaprizov?
What's the plan for the $20m cap recapture penalty we expose ourselves to by trading Parise?
I say we trade both him and Suter just to see if the league would actually impose a 40M cap penalty against us.
It's tempting.I say we trade both him and Suter just to see if the league would actually impose a 40M cap penalty against us.
I kind of want to see that too.
It's tempting.
If they did... that's like the nuclear option... we'd be basically an expansion team all over again.I say we trade both him and Suter just to see if the league would actually impose a 40M cap penalty against us.
Does that mean we get to have the expansion draft?If they did... that's like the nuclear option... we'd be basically an expansion team all over again.
If they did... that's like the nuclear option... we'd be basically an expansion team all over again.
Nope, because we'd already have a better roster than we came out of the expansion draft with.Does that mean we get to have the expansion draft?
There should be a sarcasm fontNope, because we'd already have a better roster than we came out of the expansion draft with.
We'd still not be looking at not being competitive for 5 years minimum after though.
Hartman has been one of the brighter spots on this team this year. He brings much needed grit I'd keep him around.
There should be a sarcasm font
Oh I got the sarcasm, I was just pointing out that our terrible leftovers would still be better than the expansion rules as we operated under at the time.There should be a sarcasm font
We should be trying to get our players to play as good as they can, as many will be here next year, and next year we will need one of Koivu or Staal in our top 6.
We're not making the playoffs. Nobody thinks we are, but moving everything and the kitchen sink is more likely to turn this into a long term problem than it is just a 1-2 year problem.