Everyone's playing nice and talking every day, can't think of any ways to improve that.
Once again, throwing this out. I have a couple ideas of things to add, but I'm one person and frankly this isn't just a forum for me.It's a dead part of the hockey year, but there are new folks and frankly I'm always interested in ways to improve our small little community. Bueller? Bueller?
I like this idea - how do we want to split up guys?I'm just throwing this out there but maybe we could do a player profile every day leading up to the season. Their strengths/negatives and expectations for the year?
For example:
Nick Schultz:
Good mobility, good at shutting down passing lanes. Solid stay-at home defender. Needs to get more shots on net. Needs to get back to what he does best, being solid in his own zone. Does not need to try to jump into the play.
Expectations: Return to old form, being a solid veteran who blocks shots, plays first PK minutes. Hopefully does not try to rush the puck or try to join in the rush as much. Less points than last year but better +/-.
I like this idea - how do we want to split up guys?
Sorry I meant figuring out which posters take which player.IMO, just roster guys, not prospects. And since we have time, it doesn't matter if you just go down the list or do offense, defense, goalie or whatever.
Sorry I meant figuring out which posters take which player.
Just do it like how the mock drafts are done: list the players, let the posters call dibs on who they want, and then tell us that our homework is due on this date so it can all be posted in one thread, and then everyone can have punch and pie while we rip each other for our opinions.
I agree that it's a little tough to come here and read the continued conversation right now. It's getting extremely old already and the season's just begun. Not having the strongest of starts in Finland and having this long delay in between the next game certainly isn't helping.
Even though it's going to be hard, just attempt to ignore the same old stuff and the things you're sick of. It's going to be a long year for all of us if the conversation like this keeps up.
I have to agree with both of these. There's nothing wrong with disagreeing or having a good discussion; it's the basis of conversation. However at this point there's not much to talk about given the week off after Finland and the losing streak makes it hard to stay positive. Hopefully this changes with the game tomorrow, but I will try to do a better job of being on top on the thread hijacking (which seems to be the bigger problem) so that doesn't bring down the collective mood of the forum.Not to be a Negative Nancy, but a little drama never hurt anyone on a message board. In fact, it helps spark debate and passion within people, so long as its at the opinion and not the person (even I've been guilty of that). Its when threads get hijacked into the same discussion every time that it becomes wasted. Those who do it know who they are.
On a much more positive note, what is everyone's thoughts on having a post-game thread rather than just continuing to talk about the game in the game-day thread?