Del Preston
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2013
- 63,171
- 78,954
This is from Schwartz.“Oof, don’t like him,” said a goalie coach.
This is from Schwartz.“Oof, don’t like him,” said a goalie coach.
Never mind the high workload all of a sudden, behind one of the worst defence in the league, rather him as our No.1 than Smith whose s*** again tonightHes a first year starter who has never faced such a high workload. An off season of solid training and a familiarity of what to expect and he will be good this season. I have faith in him fully.
Right on man, and not surprised that this thread was not bumped after his first performance last night. But of course, he has mostly haters than fans.As long as Tippet doesn't play him 25 games in a row and in back to back games like Hitch did i think he'll be a decent starter
Thought he looked shaky tbh.Right on man, and not surprised that this thread was not bumped after his first performance last night. But of course, he has mostly haters than fans.
Thought he looked shaky tbh.
He didn't have to be stellar though. That's all they need, is for him to stop more than he lets in.Thought he looked shaky tbh.
We need him to give back half of his contract so its inline with his value to the club.He didn't have to be stellar though. That's all they need, is for him to stop more than he lets in.
And if the oilers don’t give up a shorthand breakaway and cross ice pass that bear should of covered, he would of had a shutout.He looked noticeably better than last year imo, and specifically his lateral mobility looks much improved. He did get burned a couple times, resulting in the puck in the back of the net, but hopefully he continues to improve.
He had an .893 if it wasn’t for Sheahan getting the stick tied up on the kicked in goal, but it wasn’t a bad performance compared to what those numbers suggest
I like his size and his athleticism, and he seems to track the puck pretty well. He does seem to flounder at times when caught out of position but that's not always a bad thing, make the save however you have to. Other then that I think as he grows more confident of the team in front of him and them being consistent defensively he will look less shaky then he has.
I still think they need to can Dustin Schwartz, I don't think he's ever improved any of our goalie's games. I don't know if he would go for it but I'd love to see them bring Sean Burke into the fold. It would like have to be in some sort of front office role but could get him also working with goalies. Have a guy like Schwartz running the drills, handling the day to day on ice stuff but Burke has done great with goalies in the past and his expertise could be valuable.
Thought he looked shaky tbh.
I dont like his style. He gets to easly burned. I agree on that if he shows a high % , like 93% saving procent, but including a calming presence for the defence, and not giving rebounds, he can be worth keeping, but only for these condition.
So all he has to do is be the best goalie in the league for you to like him?I dont like his style. He gets to easly burned. I agree on that if he shows a high % , like 93% saving procent, but including a calming presence for the defence, and not giving rebounds, he can be worth keeping, but only for these condition. He needs to be a 1:st starter. Otherwise Holland NEED to get rid of that salary. Ang I think that will be actually harder then Lucic (Who lived on his reputation in the trade). WIch team want to trade for an overpaid goalie?? OK, he´s 6"7, and maybe can be a sort of Ben Bishop project, thats something winning. But Oilers need to trade him with no rentation. And we should not buy him out. That costs 2,25m$ in capspace, in 4 long years. Thats insane.
I see a Carolina-Marleau kind of deal. Staple him with Puljujärvi+ a 3rd rounder and trade for a B prospect + low draftpick. Or just trade him with a 2nd to a team that buys him out. He is that overpaid.
Maybe Chiarelli thought 6"7 is the ground for a new league-breaking goalie. But even then its just stupid to overpay him. Like I said earlier, was the russian maffia involved in this signing?
After Lucic, the Koskinen contract is his second worst move. The Eberle-Strome-Spooner is somewhat understandable. Amd the Manning trade is just a player that Chiarelli has a weak spot for. But the Koskinen deal is on every plane just a mental meltdown. Chiarelli may have soured on the org, and just wanted to tear it down.
Since the last lockout a grand total of 7 starters have had a SV% of 93 or above. Even if you're being generous and include 92.5% and above we're still talking about no more than 3-4 starters per year.I dont like his style. He gets to easly burned. I agree on that if he shows a high % , like 93% saving procent, but including a calming presence for the defence, and not giving rebounds, he can be worth keeping, but only for these condition. He needs to be a 1:st starter. Otherwise Holland NEED to get rid of that salary. Ang I think that will be actually harder then Lucic (Who lived on his reputation in the trade). WIch team want to trade for an overpaid goalie?? OK, he´s 6"7, and maybe can be a sort of Ben Bishop project, thats something winning. But Oilers need to trade him with no rentation. And we should not buy him out. That costs 2,25m$ in capspace, in 4 long years. Thats insane.
I see a Carolina-Marleau kind of deal. Staple him with Puljujärvi+ a 3rd rounder and trade for a B prospect + low draftpick. Or just trade him with a 2nd to a team that buys him out. He is that overpaid.
Maybe Chiarelli thought 6"7 is the ground for a new league-breaking goalie. But even then its just stupid to overpay him. Like I said earlier, was the russian maffia involved in this signing?
After Lucic, the Koskinen contract is his second worst move. The Eberle-Strome-Spooner is somewhat understandable. Amd the Manning trade is just a player that Chiarelli has a weak spot for. But the Koskinen deal is on every plane just a mental meltdown. Chiarelli may have soured on the org, and just wanted to tear it down.
Well a couple things come to mind. One he wasn't exactly horrible all of last season. Two he was suppose to be working on the parts of his game that weren't translating well from the bigger ice surface.Kosko with another win.
What's going on!?
Since the last lockout a grand total of 7 starters have had a SV% of 93 or above. Even if you're being generous and include 92.5% and above we're still talking about no more than 3-4 starters per year.
If he is saving at 93% you laugh all the way to the bank for that bargain and send thank you notes to Chiarelli for signing him.