Micheal Ryder : To sign or not to sign?

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,437
5,116
He's pretty invisible in game 3... at least at the halfway point.

No kidding. Would hope we can fill that top-6 spot with someone who will attempt to play defence and make more plays than weak deflections. Just down on him right now, he's looked terrible lately.
 

nyhabsfan

Registered User
Jun 23, 2005
9,932
1,705
Connecticut
In 3 games, I think he's finished 2 checks and flown by Senators at least a dozen times.

He doesn't like to hit or be hit.

He is an example of what is wrong with this team....SOFT!

I hope tonight's game is that last time he wears the sweater... I'd take Dumont over him... the kid can skate, has energy and oh ya...finishes his checks!!!!!
 

TassieHab

Registered User
May 3, 2013
431
0
Hobart
Has looked really slow out on the ice of late, what happened to the guy that was putting up points for fun back in late March/Early April? That version of ryder I would happily re sign, this current one, not so much.
 

Banjo Cat

Registered User
May 31, 2007
5,765
2,069
Has looked really slow out on the ice of late, what happened to the guy that was putting up points for fun back in late March/Early April? That version of ryder I would happily re sign, this current one, not so much.

I thought he looked kind of slow then. He was just finishing. A lot of those goals were spoonfed. But he is a good guy to feed. When he is on he is on. When he is not scoring you just notice that he is not doing much else. It seems to work for him though.
 
Last edited:

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
89,423
36,745
At least that trade domination lasted 20ish games.....We still rarely dominate trades anyway so we need to start somewhere. Let's hope we make great use of the money and the 3rd round pick now.
 

JesusBouillon

Registered User
Jan 29, 2009
1,327
7
Talk about being useless. Unless he's gifted the puck with an empty net like in game 2, he's not gonna do anything for us. All the turnovers in the opposing zone last night were brutal to watch, he can't create anything. He never looks like he's hustling, he's weak for a guy his size and frankly I'd sit him for the remainder of the series. He's the anti-Gallagher, he kills off any ounce of energy we have.
 

Blind Gardien

nexus of the crisis
Apr 2, 2004
20,537
0
Four Winds Bar
Habs don't have a lot of roster openings for next season. But there aren't a lot of quality options to consider as alternatives for any openings we do have. I think when Ryder was filling the net after the trade, he looked like a good re-sign, despite not being an ideal fit stylistically. We needed goals, he got goals, lots of them, and the market didn't (and still doesn't) look too hot.

Now... well, I think it's more up to him. And why wouldn't he explore the market? With the dwindling availability of decent players, he can probably bank on a nice premium contract. I would take him back, but more on the discount side than on the premium side, giving his imperfect stylistic fit to our needs, and there's just no sense for him in taking that, so I expect it won't really matter. He'll explore the market, and he'll succeed in finding a nice payday that is really beyond anything we could or should consider paying him. :dunno:
 

Habarazzi

Registered User
Feb 19, 2008
463
21
If there was a stat called "Fly-By's" .... Michael Ryder would lead the league every year.


PATHETIC display for a guy that size.
 

Davebo*

Guest
I'm not seeing a playoff effort out of Ryder, so no - no contract.
 

MasterD

Giggidy Giggidy Goo
Jul 1, 2004
5,625
5,004
I would offer him a 2 year contrat at around 3.5millions/year. I'm pretty sure he will say no, and that's fine, but the only way I'd resign this guy is if we do it in the mind set that he will play the 3rd line, NOT be expected to be a go-to guy, and provide secondary scoring + PP time. A specialist of sorts.
 

SirClintonPortis

ProudCapitalsTraitor
Mar 9, 2011
18,555
4,422
Maryland native
He's probably playing but *******, everytime I see, it's watching a slo mo instant replay when he "moves" any part of his body. It's like he's going 14 frames a second while everyone else is going at the full 29.997 or whatever it is.
 

1993

Registered User
Feb 20, 2012
953
91
Calgary
I would offer him a 2 year contrat at around 3.5millions/year. I'm pretty sure he will say no, and that's fine, but the only way I'd resign this guy is if we do it in the mind set that he will play the 3rd line, NOT be expected to be a go-to guy, and provide secondary scoring + PP time. A specialist of sorts.

that is $3.6 million per year too much! Run from this guy as he is just looking for a retirenment contract. We do not need anymore terrible contracts like DD has.
 

dkd

Registered User
May 4, 2012
6,803
2,876
Canada
Too old and doesn't seem to give a too many f%cks about the team. Never checks his opponent. Don't sign.
 

windycity

Registered User
Sep 30, 2003
5,485
2,103
Well duh
Visit site
At least that trade domination lasted 20ish games.....We still rarely dominate trades anyway so we need to start somewhere. Let's hope we make great use of the money and the 3rd round pick now.

we still won that trade by far. We can walk away from him after the season's over and I hope we do. Or offer him like 1 year for $2.5M which he wouldn't take
 

Banjo Cat

Registered User
May 31, 2007
5,765
2,069
I don't wanna re-sign him, but he is a good player. He floats, but he is good at it. He has a knack for floating into the right place at the right time.
 

Gyfu

Registered User
May 16, 2011
816
235
No. He is soft. Use the money elsewhere. Clarkson or Clowe.

i think we need some more size and grit for the future, so iagree (maybe a real tough guy for a 13th fwd too)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad