cg98
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2017
- 2,807
- 3,703
How many NHL points did Lily boy have last year? Oh wait..I know Charlie has 32 points in his rookie year, he's the next Ray Bourque, what a bench mark...
How many NHL points did Lily boy have last year? Oh wait..I know Charlie has 32 points in his rookie year, he's the next Ray Bourque, what a bench mark...
But but but he was a beast...in...the...AHL. Christ, Matt Lashoff was great for providence too (shudders).How many NHL points did Lily boy have last year? Oh wait..
LOL...Dermott is small sample size, and liljegren is no sample size.. yet ive seen a leaf fan claim liljegren will be > mcavoy... or that mcavoy is overated
Really no point for boston to move him to toronto at all.... unless matthews is in deal and even then its questionable
I know Charlie has 32 points in his rookie year, he's the next Ray Bourque, what a bench mark...
I can play this game too...rookie point totals:
Doughty - 27
Karlsson - 26
Keith - 21
Hedman - 20
Subban - 38
Burns - 16
shall I continue?
I can play this game too...
Cody Franson - 21
Paul Martin-24
Jeff Petry- 25
Here's a few more to add:
Myers - 48
Del Zotto - 37
Bogosian and Schenn also looked like future studs after their rookie years. Fact is d-men are much harder to predict so lets wait until he actually plays like one of the league's best before we start putting him in that conversation. It's ok to think he's got future #1 stud written all over him; I personally believe that too and he could challenge for a Norris one day. But that doesn't magically make him worth a package like this until he proves he's capable of that. I can't even remember the last time a player returned a package as valuable as the one in the OP.
As a Leafs fan...i'm shocked!! Shocked i tell ya!!Its like the OP knew what he was doing when he started the thread. Crazy!
I can play this game too...
Cody Franson - 21
Paul Martin-24
Jeff Petry- 25
So am I, slappy. Gardiner is a UFA too, so what is his value considering he isn't anywhere near as good as Karlsson.im talking value not if hes best in the world . if EK is ufa than his value is lower
Preposterous. Any GM in the league would trade McAvoy for Matthews and they wouldn't have to think about it.I wouldn’t even do McAvoy for Matthews because we can’t afford to lose Charlie, let alone send him to a division rival. This isn’t a knock on Matthews at all and the OP has great value, we just really need McAvoy where he is at this point time more than (almost) any pieces we could get via trade.
How is it "way too much"? I haven't seen a deal on these boards involving Nylander where Leafs fans feel like it isn't "way too much".
It would be very hard to argue McAvoy not being the number one piece in this whole deal, and not by an insignificant margin. Add to that a kid who looks to be a top 6 and the value is more than fair.
Naturally as McAvoy is better/will be than Rielly.
I laughed at the first part of this. Dermott is a likely top four d man but Donato is a small sample size. Makes sense in leaf land for sure.
This is one of those proposals that both teams legit pass on. It's a lot for Toronto to give, and the Bruin won't/should not deal McAvoy.
Teams don't trade young (what look to be) #1Ds. I doubt Boston is goung to kickstart a new trend.Yes for sure. Toronto is giving up an incredible amount of value in this deal, it doesn't make sense for them I don't think. McAvoy is the future for the Bruins, it would have to be a slam dunk for me to consider it (Matthews level deal, which the TML wouldn't do).
I wouldn't give you McAvoy for Matthews.
I would question your hockey knowledge if this was serious. I get the Bruins won't deal McAvoy, but if Matthews was offered....they'd be nuts to say no.Peter Chiarelli left Boston a few years ago. Maybe it's the Oilers you wanna trade with ?
I wouldn't give you McAvoy for Matthews.