Dreger: Matt Duchene Mega-thread:Habs, NSH, NYI inquired - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

BatVader

"nothing is true; everything is permitted"
May 16, 2015
12,838
11,972
Imperial Gotham
Juulsen and Sergachev could become the first pair for years to come, I know the Habs need a top 6 center but I'm afraid since the McDonagh for Gomez. Maybe they should keep both Juulsen and Sergachev and just develop Galchenyuk.

And kiss the next couple years of Pacioretty and Price goodbye?
At some point you have to stop waiting for the next guy in line to be ready and pull the trigger on a run.
We have prime Price, Pracioretty, and Weber. Think it's time to pull the damn trigger.
Sergachev+ for Duchene
Find a good top 4 D on the rental market and do something.
 

Chacal667

Registered User
Jul 14, 2012
2,482
6
Montreal
And kiss the next couple years of Pacioretty and Price goodbye?
At some point you have to stop waiting for the next guy in line to be ready and pull the trigger on a run.
We have prime Price, Pracioretty, and Weber. Think it's time to pull the damn trigger.
Sergachev+ for Duchene
Find a good top 4 D on the rental market and do something.

They could play for the Habs maybe next season.
 

Flamesjustwin

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
2,529
438
London ON
Juulsen and Sergachev could become the first pair for years to come, I know the Habs need a top 6 center but I'm afraid since the McDonagh for Gomez. Maybe they should keep both Juulsen and Sergachev and just develop Galchenyuk.

This. Markov is no spring chicken either.
 

nomorekids

The original, baby
Feb 28, 2003
33,375
107
Nashville, TN
www.twitter.com
David Poile, whose Predators scouted the Avs for 5 straight games over the last two weeks, was on 104.5 in Nashville today. He was specifically asked about the trade deadline. He said that he wants to add a forward "with pizzazz," but that "teams" are specifically targeting the Predators' top 4 defensemen, and while he will "never say never," he doesn't foresee a scenario where that makes sense.

Without saying it, he essentially stated that the asking price on Duchene is too high for him and he may go rental route instead.
 

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
11,780
3,443
Chambly, Qc
Juulsen and Sergachev could become the first pair for years to come, I know the Habs need a top 6 center but I'm afraid since the McDonagh for Gomez. Maybe they should keep both Juulsen and Sergachev and just develop Galchenyuk.

I would be willing to make Juulsen available in a package but Sergachev is a non starter for me.
 

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
11,780
3,443
Chambly, Qc
David Poile, whose Predators scouted the Avs for 5 straight games over the last two weeks, was on 104.5 in Nashville today. He was specifically asked about the trade deadline. He said that he wants to add a forward "with pizzazz," but that "teams" are specifically targeting the Predators' top 4 defensemen, and while he will "never say never," he doesn't foresee a scenario where that makes sense.

Without saying it, he essentially stated that the asking price on Duchene is too high for him and he may go rental route instead.

we've known that for weeks.
 

Meeqs

Registered User
Aug 23, 2012
9,295
1,677
USA
David Poile, whose Predators scouted the Avs for 5 straight games over the last two weeks, was on 104.5 in Nashville today. He was specifically asked about the trade deadline. He said that he wants to add a forward "with pizzazz," but that "teams" are specifically targeting the Predators' top 4 defensemen, and while he will "never say never," he doesn't foresee a scenario where that makes sense.

Without saying it, he essentially stated that the asking price on Duchene is too high for him and he may go rental route instead.

The Avs were never really going to move him within the Division anyways unless what they got back was absurd.
 

Gigantor The Goalie

Speak for the Goalies
Feb 4, 2012
13,078
2,538
New London
David Poile, whose Predators scouted the Avs for 5 straight games over the last two weeks, was on 104.5 in Nashville today. He was specifically asked about the trade deadline. He said that he wants to add a forward "with pizzazz," but that "teams" are specifically targeting the Predators' top 4 defensemen, and while he will "never say never," he doesn't foresee a scenario where that makes sense.

Without saying it, he essentially stated that the asking price on Duchene is too high for him and he may go rental route instead.

"I don't forsee a situation where I make a fair trade" - Poile
NHL GM's are the worst whiners
 

Bender

Registered User
Sep 25, 2002
17,416
8,830
People in glass houses.

And obviously having Duchene isn't a cure all, as we can see in the standings.

Don't you have anything better to do than to consistently take pot shots at the Avs and their miserable season?

Seems like someone is sad because the Avs said no to boston and their crappy offer. :cry:

:laugh:
 

periferal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
28,889
16,258
Yup pretty much. Am I missing the point you are trying to make?

Well completing the logic circle, you then seem to think that Duchene is significantly better/worth more in a trade than Taylor Hall.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,313
25,562
Well completing the logic circle, you then seem to think that Duchene is significantly better/worth more in a trade than Taylor Hall.

He's about the same value I'd say. I mean he's got at least as much value as RyJo did during the Jones trade.
 

periferal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
28,889
16,258
He's about the same value I'd say. I mean he's got at least as much value as RyJo did during the Jones trade.

I'd agree with that, so when I hear certain Avs' fans say they need essentially Larsson + two other significant pieces for Duchene, I'm wondering if they're reaching and the people who actually make the deals (NHL GMs) know Sakic probably won't get that.
 

Pacman33

#teamZ
Feb 9, 2017
1,747
656
Well completing the logic circle, you then seem to think that Duchene is significantly better/worth more in a trade than Taylor Hall.

Id say duchene is worth at least as much. Hall isnt much better offensively. Duchene plays a much better 2 way game. Also centers are more valuable then wingers
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,313
25,562
I'd agree with that, so when I hear certain Avs' fans say they need essentially Larsson + two other significant pieces for Duchene, I'm wondering if they're reaching and the people who actually make the deals (NHL GMs) know Sakic probably won't get that.

Who has said they want Larsson++? We said we want a young top pairing potential defenseman. If thats someone like Sergachev then we definitely need adds to that, if it's someone like Hanifin than maybe there's a small plus but it may just be fine 1 for 1.

Now this is what us Avs fans has said, we only know a little about what Sakic has actually asked for but I would assume it's been more than what we've been saying.
 

Pacman33

#teamZ
Feb 9, 2017
1,747
656
I'd agree with that, so when I hear certain Avs' fans say they need essentially Larsson + two other significant pieces for Duchene, I'm wondering if they're reaching and the people who actually make the deals (NHL GMs) know Sakic probably won't get that.
I dont think we need larsson + 2. Its more that most of the discussions we have are for guys that are way more risky than larsson. Larsson was young, experienced, and had top pairing potential. Nobody being discussed has all of that going for them
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,313
25,562
I dont think we need larsson + 2. Its more that most of the discussions we have are for guys that are way more risky than larsson. Larsson was young, experienced, and had top pairing potential. Nobody being discussed has all of that going for them

Larsson was pretty established as a top pairing shutdown guy, none of the guys the Avs are targeting are that experienced or have any NHL experience.
 

seabass45

Registered User
Jan 12, 2007
8,169
1,442
Forgive me if this was asked already (with 940 posts here I'm guessing it was) but what is Colorado looking for exactly? I feel like their biggest problem is depth, and obviously trading Duchene opens up another spot, but it feels like a "get as many quality pieces as you can" situation instead of making a one-for-one trade.

Isles REALLY don't want to trade Barzal and can still offer a very good package (top four D, top six forward, any first rounder). So, something like... one of Nelson and Strome, one of de Haan/Hamonic (although Hammer's value is higher), and a first. I'm guessing that isn't really appealing to Sakic though.
 

Goulet17

Registered User
May 22, 2003
7,943
3,787
Forgive me if this was asked already (with 940 posts here I'm guessing it was) but what is Colorado looking for exactly? I feel like their biggest problem is depth, and obviously trading Duchene opens up another spot, but it feels like a "get as many quality pieces as you can" situation instead of making a one-for-one trade.

Isles REALLY don't want to trade Barzal and can still offer a very good package (top four D, top six forward, any first rounder). So, something like... one of Nelson and Strome, one of de Haan/Hamonic (although Hammer's value is higher), and a first. I'm guessing that isn't really appealing to Sakic though.

Colorado is reportedly asking for a high price, but I believe that is largely due to the fact that they have no immediate pressure to trade him. They are trying to address defensive issues by adding a younger defenseman or defensive prospects. The defenseman (younger under age 25) or defensive prospects will be the key to any deal.

The Avs are probably looking at reallocating resources to balance their future lineup.

They have Duchene and MacKinnon at center, but they also have Tyson Jost (2016 - 10th overall selection), JT Compher (2013 - 35th overall selection), and JC Beaudin (2015 - 71st overall) all coming up shortly at center. The Avs likely will select a forward with their top-five selection in this upcoming draft as that is where the value is at the moment.

This same rationale applies to Landeskog, as the Avs have Rantanen (2015 - 10th overall selection) and AJ Greer (2015 - 39th overall selection, ready to contribute in a top-6 role as power forward types.

Quantity, particularly forward pieces, are unlikely to be as attractive to the Avs if they pull the trigger on a Duchene/Landeskog trade.
 

tucker3434

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 7, 2007
19,987
10,856
Atlanta, GA
Forgive me if this was asked already (with 940 posts here I'm guessing it was) but what is Colorado looking for exactly? I feel like their biggest problem is depth, and obviously trading Duchene opens up another spot, but it feels like a "get as many quality pieces as you can" situation instead of making a one-for-one trade.

Isles REALLY don't want to trade Barzal and can still offer a very good package (top four D, top six forward, any first rounder). So, something like... one of Nelson and Strome, one of de Haan/Hamonic (although Hammer's value is higher), and a first. I'm guessing that isn't really appealing to Sakic though.

It wouldn't shock me if it was Hamonic plus. He'd go a long way in fixing our defense right now rather than several years down the road like most of our other options, and I'd bet Sakic wants this team winning sooner rather than later.
 

Pacman33

#teamZ
Feb 9, 2017
1,747
656
It wouldn't shock me if it was Hamonic plus. He'd go a long way in fixing our defense right now rather than several years down the road like most of our other options, and I'd bet Sakic wants this team winning sooner rather than later.

I really hope not. Hamonics a good one players but will be in his 30s by time we can compete. Sakic gas said he wants to get younger so trading dutchy for a guy whose older than him is not real smart. That being said, i have very little faith in anything the organization does anymore
 

tucker3434

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 7, 2007
19,987
10,856
Atlanta, GA
I really hope not. Hamonics a good one players but will be in his 30s by time we can compete. Sakic gas said he wants to get younger so trading dutchy for a guy whose older than him is not real smart. That being said, i have very little faith in anything the organization does anymore

Hamonic is, what, a year older than Duchene? And defenders tend to have a later prime window than forwards. We'd also likely add someone like Strome and a 1st, which would be getting younger.

Plus, I doubt Sakic thinks this is going to be a 5 year rebuild and if he can fix the defense, he's probably right.

So, it wouldn't be my first choice, but I wouldn't hate it either.
 

Pacman33

#teamZ
Feb 9, 2017
1,747
656
Hamonic is, what, a year older than Duchene? And defenders tend to have a later prime window than forwards. We'd also likely add someone like Strome and a 1st, which would be getting younger.

Plus, I doubt Sakic thinks this is going to be a 5 year rebuild and if he can fix the defense, he's probably right.

So, it wouldn't be my first choice, but I wouldn't hate it either.
Actually not even a year. For some reason i thought he was 28. Hes 8 months older than dutchy. Im just more in the we need to blow it up camp and would prefer to get a younger guy with higher ceiling if possible. More a risk/reward guy than a safe one. Agree it wont be end of the world if we get hamonic since he will still have good value and can be moved at some point if we chose to. For me though, any package from nyi needs barzal
 

JoemAvs

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
13,671
4,116
Hamonic is, what, a year older than Duchene? And defenders tend to have a later prime window than forwards. We'd also likely add someone like Strome and a 1st, which would be getting younger.

Plus, I doubt Sakic thinks this is going to be a 5 year rebuild and if he can fix the defense, he's probably right.

So, it wouldn't be my first choice, but I wouldn't hate it either.

Hamonic is also a RHD and he is worse than EJ and does not compare offensively to Barrie.

I really don't see the need at all (aside from him being a solid defenseman in general obviously. But fit and agewise he really is not a good idea IMO) for Colorado. Really hope that won't happen or if it does that he gets immediately flipped somewhere else.
 

seabass45

Registered User
Jan 12, 2007
8,169
1,442
Colorado is reportedly asking for a high price, but I believe that is largely due to the fact that they have no immediate pressure to trade him. They are trying to address defensive issues by adding a younger defenseman or defensive prospects. The defenseman (younger under age 25) or defensive prospects will be the key to any deal.

The Avs are probably looking at reallocating resources to balance their future lineup.

They have Duchene and MacKinnon at center, but they also have Tyson Jost (2016 - 10th overall selection), JT Compher (2013 - 35th overall selection), and JC Beaudin (2015 - 71st overall) all coming up shortly at center. The Avs likely will select a forward with their top-five selection in this upcoming draft as that is where the value is at the moment.

This same rationale applies to Landeskog, as the Avs have Rantanen (2015 - 10th overall selection) and AJ Greer (2015 - 39th overall selection, ready to contribute in a top-6 role as power forward types.

Quantity, particularly forward pieces, are unlikely to be as attractive to the Avs if they pull the trigger on a Duchene/Landeskog trade.

I don't know, it feels like a situation where there's SOME pressure. They're basically a lock for the best odds for #1 this year in a weaker draft than usual, there has to be some sort of feeling that "something needs to change". It might be because if this were the Isles, our fans would just be like "screw it, keep McKinnon but otherwise blow it all up", lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad