It's my recurring nightmare lately.Always thought Barzy would give us fits when it came to contract discussion. He's gonna want a ton of money, no short of $10M per.
It's my recurring nightmare lately.Always thought Barzy would give us fits when it came to contract discussion. He's gonna want a ton of money, no short of $10M per.
Always thought Barzy would give us fits when it came to contract discussion. He's gonna want a ton of money, no short of $10M per.
Get shit for it? I don't think Barzy's signing that deal at this point. The guy means more to the Islanders than any other player in the league, except for maybe McDavid (and even there they have Draisaitl). If things go south with him, its a BIG problem. He's the only thing we have that's close to elite.Yes I know I will get **** for it, but I'd give Barzal 10M X 8 years today. Despite a sub-70 point sophomore season it is obvious he has the skillset to be an offensive force and one of the top players in the league. He has grown a lot as a player and could follow a similar path to MacKinnon where he takes a few years to really feel out the league and adjust his game to fully actualize his potential.
I genuinely believe we have a top-10 talent on our hands. I get there is a Salary cap and the business man squeezes these guys for every dollar he can save but I don't even think it's realistic to expect locking Barzal up long term on a single digit AAV. This is a franchise player and locking him up for his prime is the best move the Isles can make now. With the state of NHL contracts, even 10M a year could be a bargain on paper in 3-4 years when star talents are commanding 13-15 Mill a year (which is where we are heading)
I don't see that as an issue at all. He's worth it. It's just a lot of cap room being taken for a team that not only has to pay guys like Pulock, Toews, Pelech, but has hefty/bad contracts like Ladd, Boychuk, Varly, etc. So it'll be annoying.Yes I know I will get **** for it, but I'd give Barzal 10M X 8 years today. Despite a sub-70 point sophomore season it is obvious he has the skillset to be an offensive force and one of the top players in the league. He has grown a lot as a player and could follow a similar path to MacKinnon where he takes a few years to really feel out the league and adjust his game to fully actualize his potential.
I genuinely believe we have a top-10 talent on our hands. I get there is a Salary cap and the business man squeezes these guys for every dollar he can save but I don't even think it's realistic to expect locking Barzal up long term on a single digit AAV. This is a franchise player and locking him up for his prime is the best move the Isles can make now. With the state of NHL contracts, even 10M a year could be a bargain on paper in 3-4 years when star talents are commanding 13-15 Mill a year (which is where we are heading)
I don't see that as an issue at all. He's worth it. It's just a lot of cap room being taken for a team that not only has to pay guys like Pulock, Toews, Pelech, but has hefty/bad contracts like Ladd, Boychuk, Varly, etc. So it'll be annoying.
Barzal has a lot to learn, but he has learned a lot already. he will definitely improve with some more mass and experience.
given that, i feel his 200' game is elite, but we don't see it often, because of the style of play that he is being 'pushed' into. Trotz realizes that his strength is in his offence, and tries to fully utilize that. he'd rather have Barzy up high in our own end, because he is more valuable there, than battling physically in front of our own net. his offensive prowess keeps their defensemen on their heels, allowing for easier transition out of our end. Barzal has the elite anticipation, effort, and skills needed, to be really good in our own end, but isn't asked to do it. he has cleaned up his bad decisions greatly, IMO, and his strength is the only area that i could see significant improvement.
a 10 yr, $100 million contract?
I don't see that as an issue at all. He's worth it. It's just a lot of cap room being taken for a team that not only has to pay guys like Pulock, Toews, Pelech, but has hefty/bad contracts like Ladd, Boychuk, Varly, etc. So it'll be annoying.
10m > 11mImagine if they had Traitor's $11M x 7 yr contract on the books in addition to the upcoming Barzal contract, the other upcoming RFAs and the dead weight contracts.
If you had to choose Tavares at $11M x 7 vs Barzal at $11M x 8 it's an easy choice. They really couldn't have afforded both without gutting the team. Let's also not forget that the Isles reportedly offered him more than the Laffs.
Pajama Boy did them a favor.
What if he wants an Austin Matthews type contract? We're in no position to say no.
Then you turn around and say we can give you the AAV but need you to commit to max term. 5 years goes by quick, I Want Barzy locked up through 30 years of age.
What if he wants an Austin Matthews type contract? We're in no position to say no.
What if he says take it or leave it? We had to give into Lee, we sure have to give into this guy.
No we don't, he's an RFA with no arbitration eligibility. He has little leverage unless he wants to sit out a year.
We could have, it would just mean that we probably wouldn't have Nelson and/or Eberle on the team.Imagine if they had Traitor's $11M x 7 yr contract on the books in addition to the upcoming Barzal contract, the other upcoming RFAs and the dead weight contracts.
If you had to choose Tavares at $11M x 7 vs Barzal at $11M x 8 it's an easy choice. They really couldn't have afforded both without gutting the team. Let's also not forget that the Isles reportedly offered him more than the Laffs.
Pajama Boy did them a favor.
We could have, it would just mean that we probably wouldn't have Nelson and/or Eberle on the team.
We went after Panarin knowing full well that Barzy would require a big contract coming up.
I probably agree with you there but the story isn't fully written and both guys have only played a fraction of their contracts.Prior to last summer I would have said Panarin would be slightly preferable to Tavares.
Now there's no debate.
More importantly, Bread has made the teammates around him better.
I probably agree with you there but the story isn't fully written and both guys have only played a fraction of their contracts.
The Islanders with either of those guys are SC contenders. Of course we have no sense of the trajectory the team would have taken if we had Tavares last year but I suspect Trotz (who everyone attributes our success to) would have found a way to somehow work Tavares successfully into the lineup.
PULOCK WITH THE SNIPE!!! LOVE IT!!