Wafflewhipper
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2014
- 14,114
- 5,694
It doesn’t matter where they come from. It matters who is most ready.Lol...those 'ovs' jump right off the page.
** before anyone looses a noodle, I don't care where players come from.
It doesn’t matter where they come from. It matters who is most ready.Lol...those 'ovs' jump right off the page.
** before anyone looses a noodle, I don't care where players come from.
You think well have 6 rookies next season?
He Bure's his chances...He certainly scores goals like a certain Russian?
Robertson is a draft steal in the Aho range by looks of it. Three years of him then he will get a massive contract. The day he comes on board this team hits there window of opportunity. I don’t know if we are that ready yet because of the youth of this team. The defense reconstruction dictates how successful that window will be.I use Calder rookie eligibility to determine prospect status. That rules out Sandin. Lehtonen and Barabanov as well who have aged out from Calder eligibility. Sandin would have been 1. Lehtonen and Barabanov in that order behind Liljegren. I'm also doing overall rankings, but you can deduce F/D/G from that
1. Robertson
2. Liljegren
3. Kokkonen
4. Korshkov
5. Abruzzese
6. Abramov
7. Bracco
8. SDA
9. Lindgren
10. Scott
11. Woll
12. Kara
13. Hollowell
14. Brooks
15. Rasanen
16. Koster
17. Duszak
18. Kral
19. Holmberg
20. Loponen
FORWARDS
#1 Robertson will make the Leafs out of camp
#2 Adam Brooks will make Leafs out of camp(4th line center)
#3 Barabanov will make leafs out of camp
#4 Korshkov will make Leafs out of camp
#5 Abramov is best prospect not to make the team next season.
DEFENSE
#1 Sandin will make leafs out of camp (unless some big movement happens) trades/Ufa
#2 Lehtonen will make the team(most veteran rookie)
#3 Liljegren but could end up involved in a trade.
Goaltenders
#1 Ian Scott
#2 Joseph Woll. Both are years away.
I like your list, but just to nitpick a few things:I use Calder rookie eligibility to determine prospect status. That rules out Sandin. Lehtonen and Barabanov as well who have aged out from Calder eligibility. Sandin would have been 1. Lehtonen and Barabanov in that order behind Liljegren. I'm also doing overall rankings, but you can deduce F/D/G from that
1. Robertson
2. Liljegren
3. Kokkonen
4. Korshkov
5. Abruzzese
6. Abramov
7. Bracco
8. SDA
9. Lindgren
10. Scott
11. Woll
12. Kara
13. Hollowell
14. Brooks
15. Rasanen
16. Koster
17. Duszak
18. Kral
19. Holmberg
20. Loponen
I like your list, but just to nitpick a few things:
- I don't see the justification for having Abruzzese above Bracco. At the same age, Bracco had broken Kane's assist record (since beaten by Jack Hughes), won a Memorial cup with a near 2.0PPG stretch with Kitchener before that, won Gold with USA at the U20s, and won a Calder Cup with the Marlies. The next year he put up 79 points in the AHL. IMO they are very similar prospects and I believe Abruzzese is even less physically developed at the same age with similar issues (top speed, physicality, etc.), but his defence and compete are slightly better.
- Despite Woll's ugly sv%, I still think he's ahead of Scott because this was an unavoidable process year for him. Transitioning to the AHL is murder for young goalies. Scott will need to go through the exact same growing pains and has now lost an entire development year to boot. He also had 1 good junior season compared to 3 for Woll with BU. I guess it's a coin flip but I like Woll's experience and track record better.
- Abramov is way too low for me. I have him right behind Robertson and Liljegren (following your criteria) and believe he has the highest upside of any other prospect. Biggest dark horse prospect in the organization.
Yeah, by all accounts they're in a similar tier like you said. I just think Abramov has better translatable skills and produced at a high level with less of a supporting cast. I definitely don't believe Drury was solely driving that line in Harvard, but they benefited greatly from one another. Abramov had nobody and outscored the next guy on his team by dozens of points.Personally I see Bracco as higher but it seems like he has no future here and will either be sold for almost nothing or lost on waivers. That might not be the way to do a prospect ranking but I’ve deflated Bracco a bit for those reasons.
I view Abruzzese and Abramov as similar level guys. Both small skilled 4th round picks who has fantastic years. You talk about Abramov like he’s great and I really like him, but Abruzzese just had the most points by a freshman in all the NCAA. I get he’s 2 years older than most but he’s got huge upside as well. I probably could have put both above Korshkov, but I love Kokkonen. I guess it says more about how amazing I think our 2019 draft was.
Will and Scott is a toss up. I had them as essentially equal entering this year. That hasn’t changed much. Put Woll behind because he had a bad first pro year and is older while Scott’s lost year was bad luck
The Leafs will not be icing that many rookies/1st year players next year.
Most likely just Lehtonen and Barabanov
Yeah i may be overboard on that
Lehtonen and Barabanov aren’t really rookies in my thinking there. I didn’t know Sandin was not considered a rookie when i posted that. I do think Robertson and Korshkov will play. Brooks was a longshot in Goats spot.
Maybe a little outrageous
Curious, why you think that? Wouldn't he have to go back to the OHL?As an OHL season ticket holder and a massive Robertson fan, there is close to a 0% chance he plays with the Maple Leafs next year.
Korsh and Brooks will be 1st in line for callups, but I don't believe either of them break camp with the Leafs.
Yes. 1 more season before hes NHL eligibleCurious, why you think that? Wouldn't he have to go back to the OHL?
Curious, why you think that? Wouldn't he have to go back to the OHL?
Yes, he would.
His game just isn't ready yet. Going back to the OHL where he can get bigger, faster and stronger isn't a bad thing.
He's an extremely young D+1 (missed this years draft by days), no need to rush him.
Yes. 1 more season before hes NHL eligible
I believe the criteria is 20 years of age at a particular date, OR 4 seasons of CHL play. Ive never gotten an answer on what constitutes 4 seasons though. 1 game? 10 games?Thanks.
This will probably be the most interesting story coming out of the next camp. (if this season ever ends)
Not sure how old he is but if this Pandemic drags on long enough perhaps he will be too old to be sent back?I believe the criteria is 20 years of age at a particular date, OR 4 seasons of CHL play. Ive never gotten an answer on what constitutes 4 seasons though. 1 game? 10 games?
He can still play in the CHL as an overager but hes not obligated to (well not obligated....). AHL becomes an option.Not sure how old he is but if this Pandemic drags on long enough perhaps he will be too old to be sent back?
Not sure how old he is but if this Pandemic drags on long enough perhaps he will be too old to be sent back?
That's what I was getting at.He can still play in the CHL as an overager but hes not obligated to (well not obligated....). AHL becomes an option.
He can still play in the CHL as an overager but hes not obligated to (well not obligated....). AHL becomes an option.
Is that 20 years of age some kind of new rule? You're talking about the NHL?
How old was McDavid when he played?