Is there another team in the league that has such an undying loyalty to a replacement level player?
Is he hurting the team in any way? He is probably the only player over the past 10 years where you could truly say he would take a "hometown discount" to stay in Ottawa. If he gives the team a reasonable contract, there is no reason not to sign him.
Players with Borowiecki's style are a dying breed in the NHL, the game has shifted to encourage skating and mobility alot more than physicality and strength but I think players like him are still valuable and if you have one, you hold on to him because I doubt they will be easy to replace going forward.
Is he hurting the team in any way? He is probably the only player over the past 10 years where you could truly say he would take a "hometown discount" to stay in Ottawa. If he gives the team a reasonable contract, there is no reason not to sign him.
Players with Borowiecki's style are a dying breed in the NHL, the game has shifted to encourage skating and mobility alot more than physicality and strength but I think players like him are still valuable and if you have one, you hold on to him because I doubt they will be easy to replace going forward.
I don't think he's hurting the team at this point in his career, but that's also not relevant to the point I was trying to make. My point was that it's unusual to make such a strong commitment to a 7th defenceman.
Would it not be unusual to you for a team to say "We hope to make Radko Gudas a Washington Capital for life" or "We hope to make Nikita Zadorov a Colorado Avalanche for life"? The reason you don't hear these things is because it's flat out unusual.
Actually, it isn't even unusual, it's flat out weird. Please remember this has nothing to do with Mark Borowiecki the person.
Sign him for life but how long a hockey life does he have left? He may be done by the time some of our prospect D are ready. He's good in the gym.
We still don't know this.Meh, I like Boro. Happy to hear he's sticking around.
We still don't know this.
1) In January 30, there was an interview with Boro in the Athletic where he said that he wants to stay, but that he doesn't seem to know what the org's plans are with him. He seemed legitimately concerned about his future in Ottawa
2) At his trade deadline press conference, Dorion told everyone that Boro was told in December that he wasn't going to be traded.
So, somebody is lying here, I am willing to bet the guy lying is the guy who has a track record in fudging the facts a little bit. Maybe this "Boro for life" chatter from yesterday is Dorion trying to save face for lying about the dialogue that supposedly took place. Maybe its a negotiating tactic. Is it possible that PD's comments ticked Boro off and now Dorion is trying to play nice?
We still don't know this.
1) In January 30, there was an interview with Boro in the Athletic where he said that he wants to stay, but that he doesn't seem to know what the org's plans are with him. He seemed legitimately concerned about his future in Ottawa
2) At his trade deadline press conference, Dorion told everyone that Boro was told in December that he wasn't going to be traded.
So, somebody is lying here, I am willing to bet the guy lying is the guy who has a track record in fudging the facts a little bit. Maybe this "Boro for life" chatter from yesterday is Dorion trying to save face for lying about the dialogue that supposedly took place. Maybe its a negotiating tactic. Is it possible that PD's comments ticked Boro off and now Dorion is trying to play nice?
What are you inferring to when you say Dorion was lying about the dialogue that took place. Are you just trying to throw muck at Dorion or do you think there is a difference between the non-formal discussions that happen between Boro and the GM? Do you think it was how it is all phrased publicly? Like not being moved at deadline vs not being moved in the summer, maybe.
Just curious.
I think both can be true. Dorion has been laying it on pretty thick about Boro to compensate for the backlash in trading a fan favourite like Pageau, and Boro was probably being a bit of a drama queen in the interview in The Athletic. (You've heard Boro say in the past that his contract for next year is zero dollars.) It's all part of the negotiating dance...
It’s also a lot easier to keep a guy who isn’t looking to get a long term deal, capitalizing on a career year (no slight to JGP).
Boro will get a bottom pairing deal for a few years.
Boro knows his value and is a pretty humble guy. He even called himself a plug online (sarcasm, i am hope) the other day. He knows his value, but does his agent know... that is the question.