Oh please...Co'mon now, in wich entertainment businesses will you hire someone like you who thinks
''Who cares man? Is the objective to ''enjoy watching''
you're not being realistic here, and that's why you're in no way able to evaluate properly the work of any NHL GM, you may have some valid points to bring in evaluating some of the moves a GM do or not do but if you start a plan to become contender with the premesis that you dont have to entertain your clients you're dead wrong at the start
1) Our GM brought in Therrien and extended him, who provided us with some of the most boring hockey.
2) He fired this coach only to replace him with Julien, a notorious boring defensive coach.
3) So many teams hire coaches who instill boring systems.
4) As if I meant ''let's be boring''.
5) This isn't an entertainment business, it's a Sports Entertainment man. The objective of any competitive sport is to win.
6) Plenty of teams have done rebuilds where they suck and are boring, only to become contenders/winners. It's a common practice.
I mean really dude...I have no idea what you're talking about. Sounds like you just wanted to start arguing about something. I never said being entertaining isn't important, I meant it within the context of a rebuild and considering how boring we've been for years I find it extremely ironic how you're arguing I'm out of touch with reality here...Did you start watching hockey this year?
To be clear, you answered a post of mine where I was discussing trading Petry with another poster and he said it would worsen us. As if losing Petry is the reason we were more ''entertaining'' this year. Heck, our GM traded Subban, our most entertaining player. And you completely missed the point.
The point was it's okay if we worsen in a year where we are expected to suck, so we can rebuild better and get even more assets for the future. It's been done many times, so no clue why you say nobody does that.
Last edited: