4Twenty
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2018
- 9,987
- 11,831
They actually don’t.That’s funny because the standings say 4 wins. Regulation or SO they count the same. Just sit back and enjoy the Canucks rack up the points.
They actually don’t.That’s funny because the standings say 4 wins. Regulation or SO they count the same. Just sit back and enjoy the Canucks rack up the points.
Yeah. I want them to win a cup. You’re content with a playoff spot. That’s the difference in you and me. Improving in one season doesn’t make Benning right and we’re 6 games in. They’ve been 4-2 in 3 of the last 4 years.It should be very obvious that this team has improved a lot. You’d even get consensus on this deeply divided board, the only qualifier you’d get would the degree of improvement.
I’m sticking with my prediction that they’ll make the playoffs and as to how far they could go? A top six rental at the tdl could put them in a position to go on a nice run.
So you don’t see a better team?Yeah. I want them to win a cup. You’re content with a playoff spot. That’s the difference in you and me. Improving in one season doesn’t make Benning right and we’re 6 games in. They’ve been 4-2 in 3 of the last 4 years.
Well you responded to my comments that 6 games plus finishing 23rd overall last year proves Benning was right and that the rumoured slower build Linden pushed for us wrong.So you don’t see a better team?
So you don’t see a better team?
Of course you would.I see a team that is capped out, and mortgaged their future by trading away a first round pick that still isn't a playoff team but is doing whatever it can to squeak into the playoffs. The goal has never been to build a future Cup contender. The goal has always been to push for the playoffs and just get in. That's not good enough for me.
Of course you would.
I’m not even sure you watch the Canucks anymore, do you? You’re only interested in bashing management. I prefer the entertainment I get from watching and cheering for my hockey team.Because that's reality, and I can support my side with facts. You can't support your claims with anything factual.
I’m not even sure you watch the Canucks anymore, do you? You’re only interested in bashing management. I prefer the entertainment I get from watching and cheering for my hockey team.
Have fun with your facts.
Haha. I think it’s hilarious that you think “have fun with your facts” is some kind of insult.I’m not even sure you watch the Canucks anymore, do you? You’re only interested in bashing management. I prefer the entertainment I get from watching and cheering for my hockey team.
Have fun with your facts.
I didn’t realize I was in the wrong thread.Haha. I think it’s hilarious that you think “have fun with your facts” is some kind of insult.
If you have no interest in discussing management but instead are content to enjoy cheering, what is the use of posting, while rarely if ever responding to the content of posts.
Me too.I didn’t realize I was in the wrong thread.
I’m watching a hockey game.
Haha. I think it’s hilarious that you think “have fun with your facts” is some kind of insult.
If you have no interest in discussing management but instead are content to enjoy cheering, what is the use of posting, while rarely if ever responding to the content of posts.
I didn’t realize I was in the wrong thread.
I’m watching a hockey game.
I got sidetracked. I think I have put forward enough reasoning to show why I believe the team has improved this season but you’re right, I have little interest in rehashing the same old tired arguments. Everything has been covered by both sides.Yes, you are in the wrong thread.
If you're "watching a hockey game," then go post in the GDTs about the game. We have them for every game, and they're pinned to the top of the forum. It shouldn't be hard for you to find them.
What you're doing is engaging with people about the situation of the team and the decisions of the team's management, but refusing to do so in good faith by actually putting forward any sort of reasoning or support for anything you say.
I got sidetracked. I think I have put forward enough reasoning to show why I believe the team has improved this season but you’re right, I have little interest in rehashing the same old tired arguments. Everything has been covered by both sides.
Actually not much has been covered by the pro-Benning side. "Just because" and "be a fan, cheer your team" aren't valid arguments in favour of Benning.
Is that seriously your argument? That the roster has gotten a bit better? Wow. Honestly man, if you can't see why people have an issue with your so called 'arguments', I really don't know what to say.I got sidetracked. I think I have put forward enough reasoning to show why I believe the team has improved this season but you’re right, I have little interest in rehashing the same old tired arguments. Everything has been covered by both sides.
Speaking of bad faith arguments...
Edit: Going to start utilizing the ignore list.
But that wasn’t even the topic of the discussion you entered.I got sidetracked. I think I have put forward enough reasoning to show why I believe the team has improved this season but you’re right, I have little interest in rehashing the same old tired arguments. Everything has been covered by both sides.
This team really has no identity other than it consistently sucks on the pp. Just all over the map depending on who won the cup last.
That’s a matter of interpretation in my mind. I’m not so much pro-Benning as I am pro-Canuck but you go ahead and carry on your crusade.Actually not much has been covered by the pro-Benning side. "Just because" and "be a fan, cheer your team" aren't valid arguments in favour of Benning.
If you were pro-Canuck, you can't support the work Benning has done in his tenure. Or not attack other Canucks fans that don't follow "your view" (whatever it may be, because no one can understand, since you change the goalposts on a daily basis).That’s a matter of interpretation in my mind. I’m not so much pro-Benning as I am pro-Canuck but you go ahead and carry on your crusade.
Oh you mean your cherry picked facts.Because that's reality, and I can support my side with facts. You can't support your claims with anything factual.