arttk
Registered User
With Gillis, the debates we had was around his vision. Like his moves or not, there was logic around it. People like to shit on him for the Luongo thing just choose to ignore the fact it was all caused by a coach he did not hire and in the end he got us Bo and Marky.as weird as the sekeres story is, it is absolutely bizarre that this thread has turned into a mike gillis love affair. of all the options out there, why would the canucks turn back the clock to a guy who could not sustain the success he achieved, could not draft, and who nobody else in the league will hire seven years later.
waiting to see what actually comes out of this. as shocked as i would be if francesco stepped back, that seems like a thing that might happen. if gillis gets rehired i will have to look into the theories that reality is a simulation.
With Benning, there is no vision to debate on. It’s just a series of moves that doesn’t follow a plan and also happens to be really bad like 95% of the time. Well actually he does have one plan and that’s age gap crap and he keeps on double downing on that stupid ass strategy.