Dummies Nurse and Bouchard both played more minutes than 97/29 and were only -1, Hyman played more minutes and didn’t post as bad of results. RNH played 40 seconds less and didn’t post as bad of results. Ekholm played more minutes and didn’t post as bad of results.
When 97/29 are on the ice the game plan becomes generating scoring chances above all else, blowing the zone, making poorly supported zone exits, pinching to keep the play alive in the offensive zone with zero support from forwards. This is how Connor and Leon want to play.
Although score effects certainly had something to do with the third, it is no coincidence in my mind that we started actually building shift by shift momentum the moment they were split. Just like in the Seattle game here when we cratered in the second period when they randomly were put together, only to recover in the third when they are apart.
When they play together they both instantly go into all star mode looking for quick breaks at the expense of literally any form of defensive commitment. When they are apart they both seem to actually play the position and work back in their end properly.
I won't pin this on Knoblauch yet because he is new (this was a sticking point for me with Woodcroft because he saw enough to know better by the end). I will however blame it on the organization. How at this point has nobody in management cautioned Knoblauch that they f***ing stink when playing together to the detriment of the entire team? Or maybe everyone is still pretending that playing them together is a "nuclear option" that everyone still pretends is a net positive.
Extremely, extremely frustrating to see how those two have been managed for basically the entire year.
For a number of reasons:
1) Obviously you can't switch out an entire D core but you can find a goalie to salve some ills.
2) Team buy in is commensurate with the type of goaltending they are getting. Belief starts in goal. Teams see saves being made it makes them all better. Oilers in 97,98 etc overperformed and overachieved due specificically to goaltending. The D was rotten, that club gave up scoring chances like confetti, but Cujo bailed them out all the time helping them to win games with the meager run support that team would get.
3)A lot of cover situations are solved by goalies. For instance at least 2 goals last night being a result of Skinner having zero net front presence. Yes, sometimes a goalie has to be another defender. Again the goalie at the other end made 3 critical plays with his stick breaking up front of goal chances. He saved either one or two goals against doing that. Certain goalies like Mike Smith or Adin Hill ARE the last line of defense. Skinner isn't, he's very passive in that regard. Anything around his net that goes on, goes on, he just watches.
4)Rebound control. So many pucks bounce off Skinner and hit ice. He even has trouble corralling those pucks. I see other team goalies and they are like vacuums sucking up any puck, they don't give up tons of rebounds which invariably make any D look far worse because those are danger pucks in play.
Yes, but when the entire team (not just d core, team) can't play anything even remotely resembling NHL quality defensive structure whichever goalie comes in is irrelevant short of picking up a top 5 goalie in the league which won't happen.
I get it, you're still on the Skinner crusade because you can't drop the love affair with Campbell. At this point to pin all or most ills squarely on goaltending is putting your head in the sand. It is very obviously a multi pronged issue.