Bone for your jar
Registered User
I see, you're suggesting Lucic isn't a man, and everyone else on the ice is accountable for what they do, right? I'm suggesting Lucic expected Dekeyser to answer for something HE did. And, refused to do as you say, drop the gloves like a man. Sort of like Franzen on Boychuk today, which in reality is a much more dangerous than a nut check. Like Orpik, Franzen also has a no fight policy. He's also the cleanest player ever. I've watched Lucic enough to know he doesn't do something like that w/o provocation. I don't particularly like that he did it, but understand he was sending a message... "Keep doing what you're doing, and I'll hurt you...so cut the ****".
Do you think Dekeyser was going to drop them w/ Lucic? Uh, nope. He'd of been left standing there as the only guy who dropped his gloves. Should Looch have just punched him in the head instead of the nut check? I suppose, it would have eliminated this thread. But would it be any less "dirty"? Further, people would be reading the riot act b/c Lucic did something so blatant and selfish, costing the team a probable major.
Lucic has been nailing them on the forecheck. But, there isn't a whole lot he can do when Krejci is getting a rough ride, the refs aren't calling it (Krejci was absolutely tackled in front of the net in game 1, head drilled into the ice, puck no where near him, no call). There could be an entire thread on this, and that line being shut down for the most part, but no. I also find it astonishing that not a single official on the ice noticed what Lucic did there. I'm pretty sure they did, and assume they must have known why he did it. Krejci has been screaming at the refs at almost every opportunity after whistles. They finally called something nearly six periods into this series.
As far as the higher standard. I'm sorry, but where was your outrage after this play?
That's Lucic pretty much insuring Neil drops the gloves. Why? He went high on his centerman. Why would Lucic do that? And in an exhibition game? He wanted Neil to answer for what he did, thus be accountable. Moreover, to know he sure as hell better not do it again. Ironic, b/c later that year Savard lost his entire career, and we lost our best center, and not on a nut check. But, on a deliberate headshot. Why I find this all a little ridiculous. Savard, Bergeron, Horton, Eriksson, all top 6 players all victimized by stuff that really does hurt people. Lucic whacks a guy in the sack and.....LOOK OUT!! That's the straw that broke the camel's back? Well, according to habs fans.
If Lucic wanted to hurt people, all he'd have to do is finish his check on players who deliberately turn into the boards when they hear his footsteps. Happens every game. But, Lucic pulls up. I don't expect anyone to give the kid credit at this point. He crossed the line between tough and dirty, got called on it, and was fined. Not sure what people want here. A trade? There would be no shortage of GM's listening.
Somewhere Ken Linesman is laughing his BALLS off.
Look, some of us are disappointed and somewhat pissed at Looch, ok? We don't think it's the worst thing that a player can do to another, we're not deluded into thinking that there was no provocation leading up to it, and most likely, assuming El Looch doesn't continue doing that sort of thing on the regular, we'll continue cheering him on and enjoying his unique style of play. I think I'm safe in assuming that nobody here thinks this is Matt Cooke territory. This is, at most, getting into Burrows territory, and we're calling it out as such. You seem more outraged about this than the people who are supposedly outraged by Lucic.
The fact that we hold the players to certain standards is in fact a compliment to the team. We haven't invented the standards. The Bs themselves, explicitly and implicitly, take pride in playing the game "the right way" (though Marchand gets certain free passes due to his specialized role). We as a fanbase trumpet this line, especially in contrast to certain other franchises (the usual suspects).
He wears the spoked B, and we love him (as a fan can love an athlete), but that doesn't mean we need to condone his every deed. You're right, what Looch did is not such a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but neither is our criticism of it.
Btw loved his game today!!!
PS: you make very good points about the importance of protecting Krejci. However, not only are there better ways to do so (eg, hard hitting), but the nutcracker approach might well be counterproductive to that cause, and instead provoke retaliation.
Last edited: