I think he knew that. I think he realized his anger and reaction to his anger was wrong.
There's 2 layers to this...and both of them are wrong, although one is understandable.
1. The need to seek revenge for his friend who was raped, is wrong, but understandable. I think most would react the same way.
2. The need to seek the race of the attacker and then target ANY one who had the same color is psychotic (but i'm not a doctor obviously), its homicidal, it's not any different then Ted Bundy who was put to death because he targeted women of the same age and look. It's the same damn thing!
Like how did he get to the point where the color of the attacker was what was important???
Who did he confront? In a week's time he met no one I guess. Seems like his heart wasn't into it.
He's the only one who knows...all I know is that i'd never give anyone who had the thought process above, the benefit of the doubt.
It's an exaggeration related to Neeson's story. The kid was charged with something illegal:
He has been charged with unlawful carry of a weapon in a weapon-free zone and possession of a controlled substance.
What crime did Liam commit? Hence why the story is an exaggerated comparison.
Yes, he was charged...but according to what you think, or maybe i'm interpreting wrong...
He didn't actually follow through with it, so shouldn't he be let off scott free??
I will...as soon as you fully address mine.