For a stay at home dman, Marincin definitely likes to travel a bitSo you're telling me Marincin isn't supposed to hang out on the hash marks leaving a guy alone in front of our net?!?
I can't believe you actually had to make a poll about this. Anyone who's blaming him for those goals is clearly just taking any opportunity to lambast him. Neither were his fault. In fact, practically no NHL goalie would stop those.
I think the majority of this forum blames Andersen for this.I can't believe you actually had to make a poll about this. Anyone who's blaming him for those goals is clearly just taking any opportunity to lambast him. Neither were his fault. In fact, practically no NHL goalie would stop those.
You gonna start the 2nd period goals poll too?
Maybe the 3rd period as well...lol
Should he have....in your opinion?Were they his fault, no. Could he have stopped both of them, yes.
Shitty pole...you guessed it.Nope just the 1st ......noticed your vote is missing. I wonder why?
****ty pole...you guessed it.
Nah it was a premature poll.maybe.......at least it provided some evidence that most posters don't have moronic opinions
Nah it was a premature poll.
.906 sv% is a problem...you need your starting goalie to make a save, fault or no fault.
Not necessarily his fault but I wasn’t surprised the tip goal went 5 hole.Genuinely curious about our fanbase.
He should have stopped the second 1. The tipped 1. People talk about deflections being hard to stop, they are only hard to stop when they change direction. This goal changed elevation not direction. It went through him. He's a butterfly goalie, the mechanics make you drop to a butterfly and if a shot is chest high you use both gloves to trap the puck to your body. If it gets tipped it needs to be tipped in a way that goes to the open sides of the net. Being tipped straight down is supposed to make the puck go either on top of your pads, or hit your pads and you either create a rebound or you jump on the rebound.Should he have....in your opinion?