Not enough forwards. That is clearly the problem.
Annnd like clockwork there it is... the post-loss "Leafs need a trade to fix their team" article
Of course the leafx are interested in...everybody.
If Danault doesn't sign, Granlund looks good for that role. But....we would only look at him as a long term solution..and wont happen if he wants 5 plus. Which he does.
As what he does for you, 3rd line center at best.
I doubt he gets 5+ million with a flat cap
Our team doesn't really do forechecking or puck-retrieval. Granlund is playing with some piss and vinegar this year, trying to use his body, digging for pucks when he should be. But end of the day he's still an undersized forward and has somewhat limited success with it against bigger and stronger players. I wouldn't really be looking to him to add a lot on that front. He's more optimally a puck carrier and distributor. But one that's willing to get his nose dirty.How good is Granlund at forechecking/puck-retrieval? Seems like Matthews-Marner & Tavares-Nylander duos are complemented by that type of player (i.e. Zach Hyman).
Really hoping we add more of a physical / grinder type with some skill. We don’t need any more players like Granlund
I didn't know he had that great a defensive game. It sounds like he's a pretty hard worker too. Checks a lot of boxes. He can move into the top-6 with talent or play 3C in a pinch. A PK upgrade is actually a smart move.???
Granlund is a great PKer still, apparently. He used to be a good checker too. I'd love to add a good PKer who can defend well 5v5. Our PK is currently 19th overall and has definitely cost us games already.
i don't get what all the buzz about grandland, any team couldve of had him for free in the off season and now suppose Dubas is interested in him, common this player is not a difference maker why bother making this move, if your going to shake this team up you move one of the four, Nylander is the guy they should try and move for a defenceman thats my take, never mind tinkering with a fringe forwards, oh by the way didn't they just picked one up....hmmmm interesting
You talking today, or closer to the tdl?I don't know how they'd fit him.
Even a 2nd + Engvall for Granlund at 50% doesn't quite fit the cap if we're all healthy.
You talking today, or closer to the tdl?
please dubaaaaass pass, stay from this player......12 pts in 15 games...yeah hes the problem.
I don't know how they'd fit him.
Even a 2nd + Engvall for Granlund at 50% doesn't quite fit the cap if we're all healthy.
Wasnt he like terrible in his NHL games?
Granlund has really come back to Nashville in a sort of resurgent manner. During the offseason, I didn't want him brought back... but now it'll pain me to see him go b/c he's one of the few players that puts in a consistent effort and plays hard every game. Not really sure what would be needed to make things work out. Nashville can easily retain 50% to bring his caphit to $1,875,000. I personally have zero interest in Kerfoot or Engvall coming back our direction.
With Nashville's ability to retain and how Granlund is playing, I could see them getting a 1st out of someone for Granlund or a 2nd + a good prospect.
You add an extra body for example.
Granlund At 50% For Engvall, vesey a 2nd and a prospect.
Or you can waive Vesey it's not that hard
So you want us to retain $1,875,000, take on over $2 million in salary and only get a late 2nd and likely some shitty prospect in return? Yeah, think we would just look elsewhere.
Hey the question was asked how you make the money work the answer is you make the deal and waive Vesey or you add Vesey to the deal