varano
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2013
- 5,161
- 1,917
He would be a scratch and he'd just slot in during certain games at best.i thought of this as an idea. Like McQuaid and his toughness. Problem is, where does he slot?
He would be a scratch and he'd just slot in during certain games at best.i thought of this as an idea. Like McQuaid and his toughness. Problem is, where does he slot?
So who do you envision slots next to Rielly? I dont think McQuaid is nearly good enough to be on our top pair.
Like I said in an earlier post...trading away Hainsey would force Babcock to actually give Rielly-Muzzin pairing a chance. If babcock doesnt want to pair Muzzin with reilly at all..then
Rielly-Dermott
Muzzin-Zaitsev
Gardiner-McQuaid
Trade Hainsey? Why would TOR even dare to shorten their depth at D? Hainsey is not a bum. Maybe he's not a 2D, but he can play.
You don't want McQuaid playing every night. As a #7, vet reserve in case of injury... sure.Doesnt make the leafs d-core any better from when they first acquired muzzin. I don't see any indications that Gardiner would get traded. He's going to be a key part in the Leafs playoff push this season.
If anything, I can see Ron Hainsey getting traded back to Pittsburgh (Pens have been looking for some bottom pairing stability).
Reilly-Dermott
Muzzin-Zaitsev
Gardiner-McQuaid
I trust Dreger a hell of a lot more than you.the leafs have no interest in mcquaid.
You don't want McQuaid playing every night. As a #7, vet reserve in case of injury... sure.
Gardiner isnt an elite defenseman by any means but lets not pretend like Hainsey is anywhere near Gardiner.
Gardiner is a far superior D-man compared to Hainsey. Hence why trading away Gardiner and keeping Hainsey would worsen our team
Gardiner isnt an elite defenseman by any means but lets not pretend like Hainsey is anywhere near Gardiner.
Gardiner is a far superior D-man compared to Hainsey. Hence why trading away Gardiner and keeping Hainsey would worsen our team
some Leaf fans don't like this idea lol..........3rd and its a deal
Did you watch the Boston series last year? The issue wasn't Boston scoring greasy goals off cycles, the issue was Boston throwing the puck at Hainsey/Zaitsev every single shift and getting 2 bodies in on them. Neither of those guys can move the puck under pressure and it ends up on Pastrnak's stick in the slot. It's like a cheat code for zone entries, nothing anyone else on our team does can stop that play from being effective.
McQuaid is noticeably worse than both of those 2 at moving the puck. I don't care how many cycles he breaks up if he's just going to ice it or give it away in a dangerous spot. McQuaid is not going to beat up 2 forecheckers with massively better stick skills than him, he's not leaving that corner with the puck.
No, but I watch a lot of their games (I'm a Tony DeAngelo fan) and watched McQuaid a ton when he was on the B's.Are you a rangers fan?
Hoping for a 2nd but will be ok with 3rd and 7th