MarkusKetterer
Shoulda got one game in
because he has been the backup to the other useless goalie you hutton
No he hasn’t. Hutton has the amount of games played that he does because of Ullmark being out with an injury.
because he has been the backup to the other useless goalie you hutton
oh by the way i am not a genius by any means just been whatching the game for quite a few years and have played the game, i just have my own opinion of certain players that's all......Because you are clearly a genius and smarter than everyone: what makes Ullmark a backup?
You’re not allowed to say “he has no 35+ win seasons” as a reason.
i rest my case so he is injury prone, why on earth would the leafs trade for another injury prone backup as they already have a coupleNo he hasn’t. Hutton has the amount of games played that he does because of Ullmark being out with an injury.
heir heir well said he is ok for the shot term....Leafs are fine with Hutch backing up.
Every team knows the Leafs are desperate for goaltending help and will demand a kings ransom. They can't afford another playoff disaster.
Maybe, but a 2nd is a tad rich. Does anyone remember what VGK paid for Lehner? It was a 5th round pick. He was a starter for VGK in the playoffs too.
i rest my case so he is injury prone, why on earth would the leafs trade for another injury prone backup as they already have a couple
Until he isn’t hot or gets injured in the playoffs.The Leafs have the hottest goaltender in the NHL (and he's playing well too), so I don't see the desperation
i rest my case so he is injury prone, why on earth would the leafs trade for another injury prone backup as they already have a couple
Career 0.920 over 72 games. Not worried about him being "hot" at all. His injuries are a little concerning. Sure we'd love another starter quality goalie, but then Jack will want traded. He's ready to be a starter whether with the Leafs or elsewhere.Until he isn’t hot or gets injured in the playoffs.
how would you know what i whatch buddy, i have been whatching hockey for over 50 years so don't tell me what i whatch only, when i was a kid i used to like the sabres and still do but am a leafs fan, i whatch hockey ok and a lot of it and not just the leafs so don't tell me about your problems, wanna be hockey fan......Another goalie playing in place of an injured person doesn’t mean the injured party is a backup.
Now if you wanna say he’d be the backup to Campbell, that’s fine. But you’re a Leaf fan who probably only watches the Leafs. So stop pretending you know what you’re talking about.
thats great so i hope you keep him going forward, he will always be a back up mark my words, sabres are not going to win with him as a starter..Leafs may not want another G with injury issues but ullmark is quite clearly the starter in Buffalo and a very good one at that
how would you know what i whatch buddy, i have been whatching hockey for over 50 years so don't tell me what i whatch only, when i was a kid i used to like the sabres and still do but am a leafs fan, i whatch hockey ok and a lot of it and not just the leafs so don't tell me about your problems, wanna be hockey fan......
He doesn't need to be a rental. They're not signing Andersen, so they'll need someone to partner with Campbell next year. He won't be too costly either.
In which case, yes, it's a 1st & a prospect.
So it's a sign and trade? Because if not it's a rental....
He would be your number not even close but don't want to trade him so moot pointi rest my case so he is injury prone, why on earth would the leafs trade for another injury prone backup as they already have a couple
my grammer isn't 100% ok professori like that you type with a Boston accent!
i think your still dreaming that the leafs are going to trade for him and your getting one of our valued top prospects, dream on and on. maybe a 4th or 5th round pick maybe for that backupHe would be your number not even close but don't want to trade him so moot point
thats great so i hope you keep him going forward, he will always be a back up mark my words, sabres are not going to win with him as a starter..
Side note, it's save ratio, not percentage... (the old "sv%" shorthand keeps hanging on and nothing wrong with that)Sabres have to keep Ullmark :
as per Vogl :
Linus Ullmark is 6-5-3 with a .920 save percentage and 2.49 goals-against average.
Carter Hutton, Jonas Johansson and Dustin Tokarski are a combined 1-18-2 with an .886 and 3.66.
Well since you brought up Campbell he cost us a 3rd, a conditional 3rd and Trevor Moore and we also got Kyle Clifford back.He's a UFA, so Leafs are free to sign him if they wish. They signed Campbell after trading for him. Andersen is doubtful to come back, so they'll need someone to partner with Campbell next year.
He could be both a short or longer term solution, which is why a conditional 1st is likely. The conditions being Leafs resign him OR get to Final 4.
English isn't your strong suit is it? I said I don't want to trade him,peroidi think your still dreaming that the leafs are going to trade for him and your getting one of our valued top prospects, dream on and on. maybe a 4th or 5th round pick maybe for that backup
i like that you type with a Boston accent!