HEAVY DUTY
Thanks to denial, I’m immortal.
Nylander for M. Tkachuk.
Calgary probably won't trade him but would love to have Tkachuk on the Leafs.
Calgary probably won't trade him but would love to have Tkachuk on the Leafs.
Yeah this is the 1st year in their "window" where they are the best team in the division....and that could change again next year if things go back to the way they were.Yeah Leafs are crazy not to go all in. No other Top 10 teams are in the division. Jets & Oilers are not scaring anyone in the playoffs.
Hyman has been amazing, Kerfoot still has positive value on his contract wouldn’t be hard to move him. Engvel is another one they could move to free cap space. They could also get the other team to retain.
Taylor Hall for Sandin.
Huge overpay to get 100% retention.It's true. "All in" doesn't mean a lot when you have so little cap space. Sure TOR could sweeten the deal and ask for 50% salary retention. That only gets you so far, and probably not a player with a lot of impact.
I think we should move him also, really all depends on what’s left when they make a deal, I think islanders would’ve been a good fit for laughton but I think that may be done following the palms trade, I also read somewhere that Pittsburgh may be interested but clearly would have to be a 3 team deal involved thereDubas and his analytics group won't go for Laughton, imo. He gets results, despite lesser analytic stats.....but Dubas values those.
I see Laughton going to a team with a more "old school" GM....assuming we do move him(and we should).
Is this how Buffalo makes teams shake in their boots this year?This is where I'd draw the line in the sand if I'm BUF.
50% retention on Hall for Sandin & a dump... If they scoff send Hall to BOS for DeBrusk + a pick & let TOR deal w him & the Bruins in the playoffs.
Lol no way Rakell brings back bothRakell I would guess? Robertson and Sandin?
I would like Forsberg, Hertl, Laughton or Iafallo.
Obv Forseberg or Hertl need 50% and will cost a fair amount.
I personally think we are better served by going after Laughton or Iafallo. The prospects/futures it will cost for hertl or Forsberg will hurt is in the future. So I say go 2nd+3rd for Laughton or Iafallo
What's his injury situation?Lol no way Rakell brings back both
Leafs trading a top prospect for an injured player? Highly unlikely.What's his injury situation?
Rakell at 50% with another asset going to Seattle is the most enticing "all in" scenario imo
What's his injury situation?
Rakell at 50% with another asset going to Seattle is the most enticing "all in" scenario imo
Hence asking about it. Stinger? Concussion? Done for the year? Back at 100% next week? The answers clearly change thingsLeafs trading a top prospect for an injured player? Highly unlikely.
Rakell fetch a lotLol no way Rakell brings back both
I could see something like
Rakell (50%) + hakanpaa
For
Liljegren/amirov + 1st + kerfoot(or warm body, but kerfoot makes sense if they go for Laughton/Bennet)
then Toronto goes and grabs Sam Bennet or Laughton to fill in that kerfoot spot
They don't need a forward. They need a D.
The Leafs never need D! They need forwards and forwards and more forwards! Defense is boring. Besides why would the best team in hockey (in spite of not having won a cup since the game was played outdoors with barbed wire surrounding the rink) need defense?
Toronto won't be shipping out 2 1st rounders for Rakell (plus their 3C)Lol no way Rakell brings back both
I could see something like
Rakell (50%) + hakanpaa
For
Liljegren/amirov + 1st + kerfoot(or warm body, but kerfoot makes sense if they go for Laughton/Bennet)
then Toronto goes and grabs Sam Bennet or Laughton to fill in that kerfoot spot