I think that album is close to perfection. "Moonshake" is the only weak spot and even that is awesome. It is very organic and like a rich tapestry, a journey, etc.Wow, I wouldn't have expected Future Days to be put well ahead of all those other classics.
I think the track, "Spray" is brilliant.
Anything 425 or below is not really in my rotation. This is probably the last year. I like to change up my music listening a lot and listen to a good amount most days. I have been sort of cataloguing "non-metal".Wow. That's got to be nearly 500 albums there. What sort of time period was this over?
Also - help me calibrate your ratings a bit. What sort of score does an album need to earn a spot in the regular rotation?
A Saucerful of Secrets by Pink Floyd (1968). 2.5+/5
Black Sands by Bonobo (2010). 3.5-/5
In Rainbows by Radiohead (2007). 4.5+/5
Destroyed by Moby (2011). 1.5+/5
Collide by Beats Antique (2008). 4.5-/5
Culture of Fear by Thievery Corporation (2011). 2/5
Filling Up the City Skies 1 by Pretty Lights (2008). 5/5
Safe in the Steep Cliffs by Emancipator (2011). 3.5-/5
Ideas+Drafts+Loops by Flying Lotus (2013). 3.5/5
The Campfire Headphase by Boards of Canada (2005). 2.5/5
I feel the same way about the Doors. That self-titled album warmed up for me a little bit (mostly just based on the hits), but not to any spectacular degree. Feels more like a band with some charm that capitalized on a cultural mood rather than anything lastingly brilliant.
Captain Beefheart is one of those guys that everyone is expected to hate and find completely unlistenable the first half a dozen times or more, but it's a good thing to keep permanently in the backburner to revisit once in a while. I'd recommend repeatedly digging away at the tracks "Moonlight in Vermont", "Pachuco Cadaver", and "Steal Softly Through Snow" in particular (don't even bother with the other ones until those are listenable/infectious to you), and then once/if they ever click, let that unquenchable thirst for more like it (which doesn't exist anywhere else) slowly guide you towards opening up to the other tracks/albums. I basically clicked with it one track at a time, until eventually the whole album felt brilliant (then did the same with Lick My Decals which is at the same level). Might decide it's not worth the effort, but I do think they're one of those things (like The Beatles or Bob Dylan) that come along once in a lifetime.
Tried White Light White Heat yet? That's my favorite Velvet Underground album, and is close to my favorite album of all time. Again, more alienating, harsh, and out there and will require more re-listens than "And Nico" to get into, but absolutely worth it. Sister Ray is the greatest thing to ever come out of music, IMO, and the way everything on the album builds to that climax is pure genius.
Suit yourself-- I'm always in the mood for Velvet Underground or Captain Beefheart, personally.white light white heat is great, i love both, it just depends on what kind of mood I'm in, in that way i can't really say the group or sound is one my all time favourites, because those groups and genre of music I do love unconditionally I can play at any time in any situation and still get maximum enjoyment out of it... I really appreciate VU and what they mean to culture, what they created and helped pave the way for, but I don't listen very often tbh. but yes, both great albums, another group I went through a big phase of back in the day. As for Captain Beefheart, well, it's just not gonna happen lol
I'm glad you tried that compilation album by Legendary Pink Dots. Something about their low-fi keyboard-driven music and their lyricist is so alluring to me. I think that's a good example of their early work. Seems like New York Dolls might be getting better for you too.2.5 (Good)
New York Dolls by New York Dolls
Under Triple Moons by Legendary Pink Dots
26 Mixes For Cash by Aphex Twin
Until the Quiet Comes by Flying Lotus
Slint by Slint
I'm on board with all of the instrumentals for that Legendary Pink Dots album, but the vocals are still warming up for me. Could be a grower, but I like what I hear.I'm glad you tried that compilation album by Legendary Pink Dots. Something about their low-fi keyboard-driven music and their lyricist is so alluring to me. I think that's a good example of their early work. Seems like New York Dolls might be getting better for you too.
Perhaps it's not painstakingly-crafted, but it is infectious to the hilt for me. I think catchiness is a repetitive pattern that sort of takes a person away, or is exhilarating in some way. I think a lot of my picks in rock and punk are high because of this factor.I'm on board with all of the instrumentals for that Legendary Pink Dots album, but the vocals are still warming up for me. Could be a grower, but I like what I hear.
The New York Dolls...... I wouldn't say they're rising-- I'm sort of all over the place with them, unable to make up my mind, and have been that way for a long time. That mix melodramatic flamboyance vs. amateurish punk energy kind of confuses my senses. It doesn't feel completely like pure/raw, authentic, and unfiltered inspiration but it also doesn't feel completely cheesy/schlocky or insincere. It's kind of playfully exhilarating and infectious, but it's also kind of big, dumb, and tasteless to my ears. Weird one to put my finger on.
I don't hear it, personally.Perhaps it's not painstakingly-crafted, but it is infectious to the hilt for me. I think catchiness is a repetitive pattern that sort of takes a person away, or is exhilarating in some way. I think a lot of my picks in rock and punk are high because of this factor.
But they are sort of similar to The Stooges in a lot of ways, are they not?
I find New York Dolls keep the rock songs simple, and just speed them up a bit. This is a large part of what I find exciting and infectious: the fast-paced riffs and beats, by rock standards. It might be a bit raunchy in the lyrics, but the music sounds like it's meant to be instinctual through and through. I can't say you're wrong that it seems like it's mainly about having fun. The carefree spirit in which it is done is a large part of what makes it what it is.I don't hear it, personally.
To my ears, The Stooges sound base, primitive, minimalistic, and tribal in the most satisfying and brilliant way possible-- Painstakingly crafted? Maybe not technically either, but it's executed in an instinctive manner that feels more physically and tastefully impressive than anything that could be painstakingly crafted, not merely infectious by lowering the standards and appealing to the "lighten up and have fun" side of my brain. The fact that guys like this can naturally make better music than people who spend their entire lives hopelessly trying to get every detail right is what I love most about music, and it's an almost impossible mark to hit or, in my opinion, measure. When I listen to a Stooges track, I'm not thinking "this is fun and infectious and nothing else matters", I'm thinking "this groove, deceptively simple as it may be, is ^&%! PERFECT and can't be improved on."
I don't feel that way about The New York Dolls (or most of the other good punk bands, for that matter). To my ears, they feel more like a "lighten up, it's just for fun" band with some charm, some infectiousness, some personality, some crazy kookiness, but doesn't seem to have the instincts/tastes/musical fearlessness to translate that into something more than simply infectious and fun. The edge/roughness in their sound just feels a tad superficial and harmless to me, and I'm not sure I'm convinced that their amateurishness is more of a strength than a limitation.
I don't know how to put my finger on it, but I don't think they're pulling off a similar thing at all. To my ears they don't sound that different from anyone else, and seem to be operating on a similar level to an above average Chuck-Berry-influenced band, only they're a little more theatrical and bombastic.
Yeah, and I think that's fine..... I just personally don't feel that fun/likeability/excitement alone is enough to elevate these kinds of bands to a level above guys who are actually kind of a genius (some of whom, like Lou Reed or Iggy Pop, are every bit as exciting and infectious in addition to that, while keeping it just as simple and ****-all).I find New York Dolls keep the rock songs simple, and just speed them up a bit. This is a large part of what I find exciting and infectious: the fast-paced riffs and beats, by rock standards. It might be a bit raunchy in the lyrics, but the music sounds like it's meant to be instinctual through and through. I can't say you're wrong that it seems like it's mainly about having fun. The carefree spirit in which it is done is a large part of what makes it what it is.
I'm not sure what place genius has in these proto-punk bands, or what that word would be invoking in this context. You used the words tribal, primitive, and minimalistic before in describing The Stooges. Are those qualities genius in the case of The Stooges? I am not terribly familiar with that band.Yeah, and I think that's fine..... I just personally don't feel that fun/likeability/excitement alone is enough to elevate these kinds of bands to a level above guys who are actually kind of a genius (some of whom, like Lou Reed or Iggy Pop, are every bit as exciting and infectious in addition to that, while keeping it just as simple and ****-all).
I can't say I get the speed thing that much.