And the Habs GM continues his stupidity. The organization as a whole needs to revamped, especially player development.
Claimed off Waivers: LA Kings claim Nikita Scherbak
- Thread starter KingsHockey24
- Start date
Just Linda
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 6,658
- 6,592
Well first off it was completely changed this offseason....
Also, bad efforts and injury proneness can't be fixed that easily.
Not completely and they are still showing a complete lack of ability to develop players.
Jayan
NYR fanatic
- Jul 6, 2012
- 1,880
- 1,900
koyvoo
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2014
- 17,281
- 17,087
I mean I’m a little confused as to the timing. No pressing need to discard Scherbak at this very point in time but it’s not like this move is gonna bite Bergevin in the ass or something. Scherbak just isn’t an NHL talent.
SpeakingOfTheDevils
Devils Advocate
Weird - I've read over and over on this board that he's on the verge of breaking out? Young winger with good scoring upside?
Lol. Classic
BLNY
Registered User
He's a talented kid who hasn't figured out how to play without the puck yet. Injuries have set back his development some. He put up ppg numbers in Laval last year, going up and down (played 30 games). He needs a solid stretch of NHL games in a top six role. Let him play and figure it out if he can. 4th line minutes and second unit pp time are not going to help him - which is what he got when he was called up. He was visibly frustrated during interviews this year, which took away from the fact that his natural state is to be smiling and laughing and joking around quite a lot. I wish him the best.
Vachon23
Registered User
Like when alote of Habs fans taught that Sekac would score 30 goals in Anaheim... where really good at overate a player !
I don't think that that's the reason because they could've put him back on waivers or traded him in the off-season. He's desirable and young enough that someone else likely would've taken him for free, even if he flopped in LA. If, instead, he had shown promise--and LA isn't claiming anyone without hoping to hit a home run--having a promising young player under contract for only $700K (the league minimum) next season would've been a nice thing to have. In comparison, if Scherbak happens to show some promise with LA and they decide to re-sign him, they have to offer him at least $875K (105% of this year's salary). He may not even accept that and want more, thinking that he has the leverage (because he's a former 1st-rounder, LA is desperate and he could always bolt to the KHL). The chances of him being on the team next year seem a bit low to me, whereas having Zykov under contract for only $700K next season seems like a good thing to me, even to (if not especially to) a cap-strapped team.
Last edited:
- Jul 25, 2012
- 40,672
- 36,345
deaderhead28
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 5,361
- 3,879
The actual reason by Jon Rosen was Zykov had a additional year after this season and Kings organization didnt want to commit pass this year.Scherbak contract ends after this year.
Ok, if that's actually the reported reason, I stand corrected. Thanks for the information. I still think that it's a bad reason for the reasons that I just gave, though. I don't understand what Blake is doing. He wants to add youth and skill and is willing to trade assets and give Nylander almost $7M for 6 years, but shies away from a free Zykov over $700K for 1 more year.
Last edited:
greasysnapper
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2018
- 2,588
- 1,694
I think Scherbak is a better player, but that's not saying much. But another big factor is the extra year on Zykov's deal.
You’re still trying to read something that isn’t there. It’s not about he $700k, it’s about the contract slot for next season.
They have only 32 players under contract next season and will have only 41 if they re-sign all of their RFAs. The maximum number of contracts is 50. They aren't anywhere near it.
bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 7,420
- 10,758
I agree. If they like Scherbak and he plays well, he will very likely be paid more than what Zykov would be making. If he doesn't play well, he is likely off to the KHL this summer.
If you claim Zykov and he does well, you have another very cheap year before a new deal. If he doesn't, you waive him and if he goes unclaimed, you have another camp and year to try and polish him.
If Scherbak is just rated higher, fine, that makes perfect sense. But the contract argument actually works in favor of Zykov, not against him.
ThorNton Apologist
Jumbo needs a cup
KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
- Apr 6, 2006
- 32,429
- 11,451
Well Kovalchuk is having ankle surgery, so there is a spot open on the roster for Scherbok to show his stuff. Now if Coach WD (Weally Dumb) plays him more than 5 minutes a game is another story.
montreal
Go Habs Go
he's a very frustrating but skilled player. Put him with a sniper and he should do well if you can live with his below average defensive game and at times he just does dumb shit out there. But what a playmaker and he can snipe it. I really hope he does well, can't believe the Habs didn't at least give him a few games to see what he can do before risking losing him on waivers for nothing.
uncleben
Global Moderator
For those interested, this cost Los Angeles $67,500, paid to Montreal and not counted against the cap.
Scherbak management's was a whole mess from the beginning but the beginning wasnt with the habs. Two days after 2014-2015 whl season-opening, the Silvertips’ lineup gained a great deal of firepower with the acquisition of Nikita Scherbak in a trade with Saskatoon. He made his Silvertips debut in the home opener on October 3, thrilling the home crowd with two goals and three points. Everything after made by Kevin Constantine wasnt great for the kid. Let run a mustang when you got one. Scherbak was in cage there and it seems he never escape. LA has a job to do with his mental.
Screw you Constantine!
Screw you Constantine!
