YP44
Registered User
Kovy + pick to Ottawa
1) why would LA give up a pick in stead of just keeping him at home till buy out this summer?
2) Why would Kovalchuk waive for Ottawa?
Kovy + pick to Ottawa
New Jersey will welcome him back with open arms!
Second, what Kovalchuk and many others did at that age is relevant because at that age you either perform or become a minor league journeyman.
1) why would LA give up a pick in stead of just keeping him at home till buy out this summer?
2) Why would Kovalchuk waive for Ottawa?
Cheaper than buyout also does Kovy want to play or sit and do nothing.
Cheaper than buyout also does Kovy want to play or sit and do nothing.
give you bjugstad or galchenyuk for 50% retention
Melnyk pay Kovalchuk's bonuses? You can't be serious.Kovy + pick to Ottawa
Meh! They were aging, in decline, swept by Vegas, glaring issues. Kovy is a great player, but the consensus seemed to be they needed to rebuild, not sign heavy contracts, but they signed an expensive player who had been out of the league for a while. Now Blake is saying he doesn't want heavy contracts?I was not a fan of the signing but the above is just not true.
When he was signed LA was coming off one of the most successful regular seasons in franchise history, lead the league in GAA, and the biggest glaring weakness was goal production and powerplay. Kovalchuk was brought in to fix that and has not.
Again I did not like the signing, I do not like Rob Blake, but I at least understood the thought process.
They have the situation surrounded. Probably just waiting to hear back from the lawyers whether or not the value of the fork sticking out Kovi's back counts towards his bonus or not.So he’s either just scratched,being terminated, being traded, or just gonna sit in LA forever
Meh! They were aging, in decline, swept by Vegas, glaring issues. Kovy is a great player, but the consensus seemed to be they needed to rebuild, not sign heavy contracts, but they signed an expensive player who had been out of the league for a while. Now Blake is saying he doesn't want heavy contracts?
Did I say they were blown out?How were they in decline when they went from 86 points in 16-17 to 98 in 17-18? You revisionist history is flawed. After that year the concensus was they were at a crossroads where they could try and keep their window open by bringing in scoring or they could rebuild. As I said I was not for this signing and wanted a mini re-tool. But I did get the reasoning.
And yes the fact they were swepy by vegas mean they were blown out right? Never mind MAF set a record for save percentage in that series, series goal differential was 4 goals which was much less than most other series, and that vegas team went on to the finals. Had that been a 2nd round sweep would it be a bigger deal?