operasen
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2004
- 5,681
- 346
And have CM goto Arizona...how would that help us lol
especially when they move up to Las Vegas
And have CM goto Arizona...how would that help us lol
Why is this written like a Star Wars intro.
A short time ago
In a farm field far, far away
The Ottawa Senators realized they couldn't play defence.
I dont think the organization realizes the defense sucks.
And have CM goto Arizona...how would that help us lol
I dont think the organization realizes the defense sucks.
Tired of losing, tired of seeing the same defensive mistakes by ALL our dmen.
How could the majority of the Sens fans see how bad our D-core was going to be at the start of the season and management not see this? Even in the lastest media presser Murray said "I don't think our D is that bad"....
Are you ****ing kidding me? Half of them can't skate or pivot. The rest can't cover defensively or make passes. Only Ceci and Karlsson are a real scoring threat on any night. What a joke. Murray needs to be let go for not realizing what most of us already knew. You build a team from the goalie out and this D is just terrible.
Anyone else notice that sick rush by Lazar in the 3rd?
The guy just took off and blew by both teams. I didn't know he was that fast!
That lottery system took us from drafting somewhere around 24th to 9th. We did very well, while Pittsburgh was last in the league the previous season and one of he odds on favourites to get that pick anyways.
Imo, we won the lottery, more so than any other team not named SJ. Montreal and Vancouver did very well too.
Funny part is, the teams that probably were gifted a great position the most (Ottawa, SJ, Van) didn't manage to come out with much to show for it (Lee, Setoguchi, Bourdon RIP).
I dont think the organization realizes the defense sucks.
So the D is bad because only EK and Ceci are offensive threats??
While I agree Phillips shouldn't be on the top pairing at this point in his career, more likely a 6/7 guy, offense from the back end isn't the problem.
However inserting Cowen or Boro into that spot isn't the best idea either for their development, given how EK is playing the game ATM.
Fact is EK is all over the ice and attempting too many high risk plays and turning over pucks and getting caught out of position too often.
While EK may feel the need to make something good happen every shift, the results suggest he needs to be more patient/disciplined.
In no way am I suggesting EK is the only problem, absolutely not.
However when the team's "best player" is playing 28 - 30 minutes a game and is playing in a high risk fashion, the end result is likely not going to be positive.
IMO regardless of how Phillips, Ceci, Cowen, Gryba, Wiercoich or Boro are playing, EK needs to be better for the team to improve.
What was Gryba doing copying Phillips? Maybe if Gryba didn't also lay down and wave his stick around, we'd be telling a different story?
dave reid is a REAL moron
blaming ryan and turris for the 4th goal and NO f.... mention of phillips
Wow Buffalo is three points behind us.
Now that is eye opening.
Tired of losing, tired of seeing the same defensive mistakes by ALL our dmen.
How could the majority of the Sens fans see how bad our D-core was going to be at the start of the season and management not see this? Even in the lastest media presser Murray said "I don't think our D is that bad"....
Are you ****ing kidding me? Half of them can't skate or pivot. The rest can't cover defensively or make passes. Only Ceci and Karlsson are a real scoring threat on any night. What a joke. Murray needs to be let go for not realizing what most of us already knew. You build a team from the goalie out and this D is just terrible.
Zack smith still looked lost tonight. Expect a coachin change in the morning.
Oh ya, Greening. Guy was decent tonight.
I honestly have no idea why we do it.
Looks like a team that's 30th in spending to me. I've criticized him in the past but it's like there is much flexibility for him to do anything.
Why can't he have something that costs money when he doesn't have money to spend? The answer seems pretty straightforward, so I'll just give a quick analogy.
Let's say you expect to drive a Ferrari. You don't have the money, so you get a Lada instead because it fits your budget. Maybe the Lada manages to pass a car on the highway now and again, which makes you happy when it happens. Maybe you are the type who can convince yourself to believe that the Lada is passing a whole bunch of cars when, in fact, you are slowly chugging through a lot and the other cars are parked. Being a Lada, the Lada does Lada things, like billowing smoke or lurching forward every time you put it in 1st.
Everything is fine so long as you recognize that you are not driving a Ferrari. Things get weird when you start to make yourself believe that the Lada is actually a Ferrari, or that your budget can get a car that is on par with a Ferrari.
they double shifted karlsson a lot cause cowen was in the box which might be why you saw him with ceci. I think they might have switched Boro and Phillips at some point aswell
we really need another offensive dmen imo. Ceci might get there one day but he isn't there yet
bob mackenzie said today that murray has been trying to find deals to improve his team
there is just nothing worth it out there
IMO regardless of how Phillips, Ceci, Cowen, Gryba, Wiercoich or Boro are playing, EK needs to be better for the team to improve.
I'd like to track Karlsson's high risk plays by situation. It seems to me that many of his higher risk plays come when the team is trailing which imo is only natural. I would expect that Subban, Pietrangelo, Doughty, and Weber all likely play a bit higher risk when trailing as well, the difference being that we aren't as good, so we are trailing more often.
Karlsson certainly plays a higher risk game right off the bat too, but the difference is likely exagerated by the situation, or at least that's my suspicion.
Yeah, it was a cluster**** of a play. Turris plays lazy defense, Phillips falls down, so Gryba falls down...
I'd like to track Karlsson's high risk plays by situation. It seems to me that many of his higher risk plays come when the team is trailing which imo is only natural. I would expect that Subban, Pietrangelo, Doughty, and Weber all likely play a bit higher risk when trailing as well, the difference being that we aren't as good, so we are trailing more often.
Karlsson certainly plays a higher risk game right off the bat too, but the difference is likely exagerated by the situation, or at least that's my suspicion.
You may be right, but I'm not sure that this is the case.
While I can't disagree all the top offensive players have a higher turnover rate, EK just isn't playing with any structure to his game.
He is all over the ice taking inordinate risk and it just hasn't brought positive results.
So while it may be in vogue to criticize Phillips or the D in general after every loss, the fact is EK isn't playing close to his potential which is more disconcerting to me than Phillips falling down or Gryba doing the breast stroke on the ice.
Couldn't agree more with you here as i notice it too....karl tries to do things when we are losing which weirdly has been a lot the last little while, that said the media loves to pick on Ottawa (will always maintain the CDN media loves to use the Sens as a punching bag because outside the city everyone hates this place because of politics, hell half the people living here can't say a good thing about it) and the sens, prime example last night with blaiming EK for goals and no mention of the other world class dmans blunders. A lot of the other superstars only get mentioned when doing awesome things, when they make mistakes usually nobody mentions it, with Karl its the opposite.
I agree he could be better but it's unrealistic to expect that to happen while he's being asked to play 28 shifts a game at one minute each. Simply demanding that he play better isn't going to make him play better, you actually have to make some tangible change so he can do it.
What will make EK better is shortening his shifts from 60 seconds to about 45-50 seconds, never wasting him on the PK and giving him an extra ES shift or two per game. Then we'd get a much more effective EK for 25 minutes, instead of a tired EK for 30 minutes/game.
The problem is that an extra 3-4 minutes of Gryba every game is way worse than 3-4 minutes of a tired EK. That's why they're using the players this way in the first place.
What they need to do is jettison Phillips and Gryba replace them with a decent pair of NHL D-men.
Not sure EK's problems are solely related to his ice time.
Secondly it isn't EK having to cover up for Phillips or any of the other D 99% of the time.
IMO it is disingenuous to look at Gryba or Phillips as a way to defend EK's play.
EK has an order of magnitude more skill than either of these players, yet other than the occasional flashes of brilliance isn't playing close to his potential IMO.
Not sure EK's problems are solely related to his ice time.
Secondly it isn't EK having to cover up for Phillips or any of the other D 99% of the time.
IMO it is disingenuous to look at Gryba or Phillips as a way to defend EK's play.
Not sure EK's problems are solely related to his ice time.
Secondly it isn't EK having to cover up for Phillips or any of the other D 99% of the time.
IMO it is disingenuous to look at Gryba or Phillips as a way to defend EK's play.
EK has an order of magnitude more skill than either of these players, yet other than the occasional flashes of brilliance isn't playing close to his potential IMO.