It’s hysterical that you say his “cross-overs don’t look dynamic” as if your a accredited skating coach. I’m somewhat confused as to what you’ve been watching the past 3 games; his skating is very good. Not elite, but definitely not mediocre.
How do you know I am not one? Why does it matter? Why does me saying that make it hysterical? Is it hysterically false in your opinion? Are only skating coaches allowed to comment on someone's skating ability? Do you think he has dynamic crossovers? Are you a skating coach? I don't follow you here.
I mean, I guess the thing that people here
really struggle with is what is "good"? Because compared to yourself, Fiala is an amazing skater. Sure. But compared to NHL competition where you are supposed to beat best players in the world who constantly have the natural advantage over you in order to create offense (without puck on defense vs challenging with puck on offense)? Yeah, he's pretty meh. He isn't beating guys with his skating. It's not dynamic or explosive. He has silky hands, but his non-stationary moves (including his pretty good lateral ability) come largely from slow-ish glide which is a limiting factor and plays part in his poor production. He falls quite a lot and is not strong on the puck. Night and day difference compared to Forsberg who someone mentioned earlier, you saw his power and strength in his skating in that tying goal. Fiala is not capable of that (at least currently).
It's really funny watching you guys' reaction to this, but this really shouldn't be the kind of blasphemy you make it to be. I think if you guys actually sit down and ease off on the snarky and juvenile insults and comments, maybe open your mind a bit and think about
what makes a player beat another player (not goalie), it almost every time comes down to SKATING in some shape or form. There's other things involved there too, but skating is the core of everything. I've noticed, and this is something that this thread greatly demonstrates as well, that only a tiny tiny fraction of hockey fans actually understand skating ability and the nuances of it enough to evaluate it properly. Seem like the vast majority of people just shrug off "ya he's a very good skater" as long as the guy doesn't look like Hendricks. The analysis doesn't tend to go much deeper than that.
A guy like Spurgeon is in the 1% of skating ability in the NHL. Actually off the top of my head I can't think of a defenseman with better mobility, so might as well say he's currently the best skating defenseman in the league. Brodin isn't too far off from there either. Staal is probably in the bottom 20 percentile (only reason why it's not bottom 10 is because he's pretty strong in battles at least in the first half of the shift). I'm not sure where exactly I'd put Fiala, but for example Granlund despite all his stumpyness was overall a better and more effective skater. Going back to the "skating is the core everything", I'm not sure if it's even possible that a guy who scores 70 points in a season is a worse skater than a guy who scores 40-50 points in season (remember, skating is so much more than just being a fast north-south skater). Maybe there's some exceptions there, but it's very rare.