To claim that Kessel's obviously poor work at even strength last season is solely the fault of other people
is to "dismiss Kessel's garbage advanced stats last year." People pulled this routine with Beau Bennett for 5 years. "It's not that he's bad, it's just that everyone and everything else is working against him." They blamed Adams, you blame Johnson. They blamed the coaches (3 different ones), you blame the coaches.
This is an emotional form of argument, not a rational one. You're proceeding from "I like this player" and working backwards from that to find an explanation for his poor play that doesn't fault him, rather than looking at things dispassionately to try to figure out what's going on.
Sometimes a thing is exactly what it looks like it is. Visibly, Kessel's play at even strength was bad.
His play, not "everyone else's but his." The data agreed.
This convinced the Penguins, rightly or wrongly, that that early 30s washup thing that usually happens to
players who don't take fitness seriously was at risk of happening to Kessel and that they didn't want to be holding the $21 million contract bomb when it went off. So they moved him for a guy with an expiring contract. Early indications are that they moved him just in the nick of time, though it's possible he still has
some hockey left.
There's nothing else to this story. No conspiracies about coaches, nothing. Just a player getting older and a team that didn't think he had 3 more years of marquee money hockey in him.
Yeah, that one extra point in 4 more games than the guy who took his spot sure would make a difference. Really salivating over the kind of production that ties a man for 1st in man-advantage points on the 21st-best powerplay in the league.