Kessel is in Galchenyuk’s role in Arizona is even worse than he was here. And that team is rolling teams. Arizona’s powerplay is also pretty mediocre.
Kahun, Rust, McCann would not be getting the usage they are now if we had Kessel. Rust is proving as I predicted he could easily replace ES Kessel if given the time in the top six in his natural position.
Arizona improved on the PP and we declined considerably. Contrary to popular opinion at the time, Galchenyuk has not come close to matching Kessel's impact here at ES or on the PP, and none of our PP options have adequately replaced Kessel's presence in transition or on the left boards.
There's zero reason why Kahun, McCann or Rust couldn't be used exactly the same way this year if Kessel were here. It's literally as simple as using Kessel like we use Galchenyuk at ES. And as much as I like Rust, remember that he's on one of his patented hot streaks and he has about as much chance of replacing Kessel's ES production as Galchenyuk did/does.
Shot totals/attempts are proxies (and not very good ones...the pro clubs now use biometrics and/or unknown criteria hand-counted via manual video review conducted in-house or at a consulting firm) for territorial results, which can be one indicator (among many) of how a player's playing, since shot-based metrics show a correlation--not a causation, a correlation--to success on the ice. They are not an end in themselves. The purpose of hockey is not to slightly outshoot the other team, but to win the game. So and so's fenwick% being 3 points above sea level does not mean he's having a good season.
If his critics believed this all along, at least there would be some consistency.
The problem is that they put Kessel over the barrel last year for those very same metrics last season without taking the context into account, and now that they paint a much sunnier picture, they're dismissed.
In Kessel's case, he's a $7 million player with 1 goal at even strength (good for 10th on his team) and 3 assists (good for 7th) at the quarter season mark. He is not bringing value equal to the share of salary cap allocated to him (or even coming close, really) which is why Coyote fans are displeased with him. That his line shoots a few more times than the opposition while starting almost entirely in the offensive zone is not something to brag about, considering a) that's the expected result for any player and b) the outcomes that occur when Kessel is on the ice are otherwise poor.
Right. And last year his ES production was elite but the shot differential stats were poor.
The goalposts are always moving with Kessel. One indisputable fact is that we would be a much better team right now if we had Kessel in Galchenyuk's place. The former fills a number of roles we could use (even in Arizona, he has more PP points than anyone on our team) and the latter fills none while having all of Kessel's drawbacks.