The Examiner
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 6,525
- 1,940
In a heartbeat
WOW! Some humility from a Leaf fan. Bravo, sir!
In a heartbeat
Since breaking into the NHL full-time, Kadri ranks 34th in center scoring. Think the lockout was a fluke? Remove it and he's 44th.
"3rd line center", there are your stats.
Doesn't Babcock think he's playing well in his current system?In defensively lack systems, which Kadri and team missed the playoffs 4 out of 5 times, he was able to put up pedestrian point totals. Nothing to beat your chest about.
In a defensively sound system, he has struggled to produce goals. I think its a bit early to peg him as a 1 or a 2, he will decide by his play and production where he pegs in. I think its safe to say he can easily play 3rd line minutes under Babcock. The question is, can he produce and play great defence as a top 2 guy in Babcock's system, I feel that only time will tell us that.
Doesn't Babcock think he's playing well in his current system?
I think at the end of the day it will be a Nylander/Marner line, with Kadri as the number 2 centre, and a fine one he will be. After that, as 3c Bozak for a while? Gauthier eventually? Who knows, but Kadri I believe will be with the team at least another 4 or 5 years. He is just in his prime, and the goals will come. Thankfully Babcock and this management understand how to evaluate his play, which has been excellent.
Babcoks said one day that Kadri has been his best forward, then the very next day when asked about Kadri he said that we are in the business of scoring goals, so Babcock seems to be saying things that are in conflict with each other.
If someone says Babs I got this guy who is on pace to score 8 goals and a 2.4% shooter, he's the perfect #1 or #2 center for you, I take a 1st rounder and a prospect for him... Babs, Shanny and Lou would probably tell you to pound sand.
From a development perspective I'm guessing Babcock is very happy, from a production perspective I'm betting that he is quite disappointed.
So talking about playing well and producing well, it's probably important to be clear that there is a difference between the two and that needs to be considered when thinking about Kadri's net worth to the team.
I like Kadri
But I'm not paying top dollar for a defensively responsible center with no finish - leaf brass gave him 1 season to show them the money ... And well ...
Babcoks said one day that Kadri has been his best forward, then the very next day when asked about Kadri he said that we are in the business of scoring goals, so Babcock seems to be saying things that are in conflict with each other.
If someone says Babs I got this guy who is on pace to score 8 goals and a 2.4% shooter, he's the perfect #1 or #2 center for you I take a 1st rounder and a prospect for him... Babs, Shanny and Lou would probably tell you to pound sand.
From a development perspective I'm guessing Babcock is very happy, from a production perspective I'm betting that he is quite disappointed.
So talking about playing well and producing well, it's probably important to be clear that there is a difference between the two and that needs to be considered when thinking about Kadri's net worth to the team.
Yeah I forgot the season ended yesterday, can't believe Crosby is a 40 point player now...what happened to him
Your analogy is perfect. Thanks.
Kadri == Crosby.
Yeah I forgot the season ended yesterday, can't believe Crosby is a 40 point player now...what happened to him
I disagree. I think Babcock better then anyone can see that Kadri is getting excellent scoring chances, just snake-bit. As well, the Leafs have about 3 or 4 goals created by Kadri with his penalty drawing, for which he is alone in the league. He has stuck with Kadri, and I hope that with the goal last night the drought will be over and he will return to a more normal goals per shots percentage.
The obvious difference is Crosby has a massive history of leading, winning championships, being an elite sniper and setup man, so when he goes through a small slump, you'll give him the benefit of the doubt, when a guy who has never won anything at the pro level, never leaded his pro team and never scored at more than a pedestrian rate, goes through a major slump, he doesn't give the benefit of the doubt.
I know sample sizes quite well actually.Instead of realizing the point he was trying to make was that even generational players can have scoring slumps and therefore production over a small sample size is not a great way to judge a player, you instead fall back to "comparisons aren't perfect and therefore they're worthless".
Ooops. Proving everyone right that is for sure.Toronto Maple Leafs: Mike Babcock Wants Nazem Kadri to Prove People Wrong (Summer 2015)
http://tipofthetower.com/2015/07/08/toronto-maple-leafs-mike-babcock-wants-nazem-kadri-bring/
Kadri scored at more than double his current pace over a nearly 50 game stretch. He's scored 1.5x his current pace over a full season with Clarkson on his wing.
Crosby is a PPG+ player. Even if he was on pace for 60-70 points, you'd think he'd improve. Kadri is a 0.5PPG+ player. So when he's on pace for 31 points, you should also think he'll improve.
Especially given his 2.4S%, Kadri deserves the benefit of the doubt that he'll improve his production soon. Whether that looks like 40 points or 60 points remains to be seen, but it will go up. My guess is somewhere in the middle.
I dont think anyone here believes Nazem is going to stay on a 30 pt pace, but is a 40-50 pt pace really much better considering the changes in playing time, situations etc?
Kadri currently scores a point in 39% of his games, to score 50 points for the season he would have to increase that to a point in 69% of his remaining games. Not impossible but he would have to have a serious uptick in his rate of production. he would have to score at a 56 point pace to hit 50, not impossible by any means but considering his best season ever was 50 points in a run an gun system and this year he is playing a much more defensively structured system, I'd say 50 points is improbable.
Your analogy is perfect. Thanks.
Kadri == Crosby.
Kadri currently scores a point in 39% of his games, to score 50 points for the season he would have to increase that to a point in 69% of his remaining games. Not impossible but he would have to have a serious uptick in his rate of production. he would have to score at a 56 point pace to hit 50, not impossible by any means but considering his best season ever was 50 points in a run an gun system and this year he is playing a much more defensively structured system, I'd say 50 points is improbable.
I dont think anyone here believes Nazem is going to stay on a 30 pt pace, but is a 40-50 pt pace really much better considering the changes in playing time, situations etc?
I thought the same, it's a weird way to calculate. Why not use PPG?Huh???? Multi point games exist The 50 point pace is 12-13 points right now, and he has 8, hardly improbable for him to catch pace. The math you did there doesn't really reveal anything unless were assuming that all he can get is a single point a night, which is false.