In which case EJ would lose $4M by not waiving.That also seems reasonable but assumes he waives for the ED. If Avs need to use a protection slot for EJ, he’s getting bought out. The Avs won’t lose a player like Bura or Kadri to protect EJ.
In which case EJ would lose $4M by not waiving.That also seems reasonable but assumes he waives for the ED. If Avs need to use a protection slot for EJ, he’s getting bought out. The Avs won’t lose a player like Bura or Kadri to protect EJ.
So he’ll waive. I’m 97% sure of it. And the other 3% is he gets bought out.In which case EJ would lose $4M by not waiving.
Still too much to have tied up in that kind of performance for a tight cap year.With that kind of term and AAV remaining, versus performance, he's probably going to be an Av for another year. They could probably then move or buy out the last year.
Still too much to have tied up in that kind of performance for a tight cap year.
This free agent market you can get a good 4th line for $3.5M.I don't really disagree, but we're still arguably the best positioned team to handle a flat cap, even with Compher still on the roster. Really, he's is only really overpaid by maybe $1.5 (less if he rebounds to ~0.5PPG), which we've more than made up with great contracts in numerous other places (Mack, Girard, Toews, Kadri). On top of that, we have a bunch of guys who could potentially contribute on their ELCs (Byram, Newhook, Kaut, Bowers, Ranta, etc.) coming in the near future. An extra $1.5m for 2 years isn't the end of the world.
He's gonna be making more $$ forcinf a buy out...In which case EJ would lose $4M by not waiving.
He's gonna be making more $$ forcinf a buy out...
2/3 of his contract, + the other contract he'll get on the UFA market (2years 6M probably)
Waiving = he actually takes the chance Sakic pays SEA tot ake him and gain 6M of free cap space.I mean I am not sure he can get 2x3m with his recent injury history in a flat cap world.
Atleast not significantly more. So why not stay on a contender on the team you have been a longtime with instead?
Seattle is not going to take him anyways...
Waiving = he actually takes the chance Sakic pays SEA tot ake him and gain 6M of free cap space.
If you're in EJ's shoes, you either secure your spot (not waive), or you get bought out and go to another contender on a 2 X 3M type of deal if you're getting bought out.
EJ would get 2 X 3M easilly. when he plays, he's still effective, @ 3M it's not a big risk
Have you checked his injury history?
Dude can't stay healthy to save his life over the last few years and he is not going to get any younger...
I doubt any real contender is dumb enough to pay him much more than that.
Seattle is never going to take him. And if he is willing to screw over his team like that, I'd say good riddance to him anyways..
Screw over his team? The guy has a NMC in his contract. He signed it, and your GM agreed to it. He can do whatever the F he wants with it.
Waiving = he actually takes the chance Sakic pays SEA tot ake him and gain 6M of free cap space.
If you're in EJ's shoes, you either secure your spot (not waive), or you get bought out and go to another contender on a 2 X 3M type of deal if you're getting bought out.
EJ would get 2 X 3M easilly. when he plays, he's still effective, @ 3M it's not a big risk
What are the Avs adding to his 6M$ contract to trade him? Marleau cost a 1st for 1year, so 2 first?Or he gets traded to one of the 19 teams that isn't on his list.
This free agent market you can get a good 4th line for $3.5M.
What are the Avs adding to his 6M$ contract to trade him? Marleau cost a 1st for 1year, so 2 first?
The better question, which I've asked you repeatedly with zero rational answers in return, is why is EJ going to pick a fight he can't win that will most likely lead to him no longer being a member of the Avs? What's the upside for him, other than "because he can"?
They’ll get injured.Maybe, but I'd much rather give our youngsters the opportunity to get NHL playing time on the 4th line, so they can adjust to the NHL in a more sheltered role. If we don't promote from within, then we're not taking advantage of one of the main benefits of having our AHL team in Loveland, playing the same system.
What's the long term benefit of signing UFAs and preventing our youngsters from getting significant ice time?
He waives = he loses in a lot of ways, he doesn't hold his own faith
He doesn't = he stays a Avs, or he gets 2/3 of hiw contract + another one and gets to chose where he goes
They’ll get injured.
All of our players get injured.If the UFAs we sign are going to get injured, why sign them in the first place? Or are you saying our youngsters will get hurt, so we shouldn't let them play in the first place?
All of our players get injured.
What are the Avs adding to his 6M$ contract to trade him? Marleau cost a 1st for 1year, so 2 first?
This bozo thinks Price will waive no problem for the Habs. But no way other teams get guys with NMCs to waive.Any chance you could actually explain the ways in which he loses by waiving? Because, it seems like staying with the Avs, getting paid $6m per season, and having a chance at the Cup are all positives. What exactly is he losing by waiving his NMC, when there's essentially zero chance he'll be selected by Seattle?
Also, how many choices is he going to have as an oft-injured 33 year old who has only played 4 games this year? And, how does a 1 year, $1m contract make up for losing $4m from getting bought out?
Getting rid of JTC alone will make room for Lando’s raise.So, we should tear down the whole team and replace them with cheap UFAs? Or does that only apply to the players you don't like?
Or the Avs retain $2 mil and send a 2nd. You said yourself a contender would gladly pay EJ 2 x 3 mil. I’m sure there’s a market where a team will take him that’s overpaid by $1 mil + 2nd. Hell, a bubble team may even think he has positive value at 2 x 4 mil since they wouldn’t have been able to get him normally.