Joshua Leivo & Tanner Pearson Be Better Or Get Waived!

[bossram]

and, later it will look not so good.

Nice try, but incorrect.

Like I said at the time, their underlying numbers were (and are) suggested they were playing well. Now they're just getting the bounces with some points.

 

[maroon 6]

The thread that keeps on giving

Tanner Pearson with 31 points in his last 31 games

 

[Canucks LB]

This thread kind of reminds me of the Alex Burrows one (mini version) on CDC they had ages ago

 

[Billy Kvcmu]

I almost forgot we still have Leivo, jesus we have some DEPTH up front

Oh right and Ferland has been a non-factor thus far, we need to move out some bodies.

Schaller down and one veteran has to go

 

[krutovsdonut]

lol at the start of this thread.

 

[DonnyNucker]

Neither are very good and their performances are pretty predictable.

Absolutely

 

[Billy Kvcmu]

Neither are very good and their performances are pretty predictable.

Legendary post

 

[Billy Kvcmu]

That they locked into the idea of Horvat and Pearson as a pair after 19 garbage time games shows you the exact thought process this management team goes through and why they constantly make mistakes in evaluation.

My god
This thread is a gold mine

 

[Hit the post]

This thread kind of reminds me of the Alex Burrows one (mini version) on CDC they had ages ago

Until either guy scores an OT series clinching goal for us in the postseason, any similarities will be minor.

 

[bandwagonesque]

It’s so easy being right on things like this.

So, so true.

 

[Pastor Of Muppetz]

 

[Lupuls Grit]

This may be the best post in the history of posts.

 

[Zombotron]

Burrows Do We Need Him on CDC and We need to talk about Tampa are still better

 

[Cogburn]

Pearson has risen to the challenge , that he probably didn't know was made.

Leivo, heal up and score at a ppg! You're up!

 

[Boeser Fan]

I almost forgot we still have Leivo, jesus we have some DEPTH up front

Oh right and Ferland has been a non-factor thus far, we need to move out some bodies.

Schaller down and one veteran has to go

Because he has a concussion

 

[Hit the post]

Leivo, heal up and score at a ppg! You're up!

We don't even have cap space to add Finn.

 

[WhiteCurse]

Because he has a concussion

Apparently not a concussion, so that is good

 

[Pastor Of Muppetz]

Tanner Pearson 15 g 24 a 39 points

 

[M2Beezy]

Tanner Pearson 15 g 24 a 39 points

Agreed

 

[Pastor Of Muppetz]

I expect nothing from Leivo and Pearson and I am happily rewarded.

No complaints here.

"And Pearson, yeah, there is a reason he played on 3 teams last season. And there was a reason the "haters" thought it was incredibly stupid to bank on 19 garbage time games to lock him into the 2nd line LW position that Benning's whiteboard certainly had him on"...420 Canuck

 

[mossey3535]

I mean, happy for Pearson but he just as easily could go into a long slump again...I'd still rather have a developing player take his place at a lower number. Good story the middle of this year but he's not integral to our plans to contend IMO.

 

[Fatass]

I mean, happy for Pearson but he just as easily could go into a long slump again...I'd still rather have a developing player take his place at a lower number. Good story the middle of this year but he's not integral to our plans to contend IMO.

Pearson is playing good hockey.

 

[Fatass]

Burrows Do We Need Him on CDC and We need to talk about Tampa are still better

CDC is aptly named. That disease of a board needs to be kept from spreading.

 

[Hodgy]

"And Pearson, yeah, there is a reason he played on 3 teams last season. And there was a reason the "haters" thought it was incredibly stupid to bank on 19 garbage time games to lock him into the 2nd line LW position that Benning's whiteboard certainly had him on"...420 Canuck

I like that some are holding Pearson’s play out as some sort of feather in Benning’s camp. Pearson’s production could not have been predicted, nor is it sustainable. In addition, it relies on a ton of empty net goals.

Moreover, let’s not pretend like Pearson was a gem unearthed by Benning. The reality is that Pearson probably wasn’t even targeted; he was just one of the few players that were available for Gudbranson. Gudbranson was like nuclear waste. Benning should be praised for just unloading it, but no one should be stupid enough to believe that Benning specifically targeted Pearson.

 

[Hoghandler]

I like that some are holding Pearson’s play out as some sort of feather in Benning’s camp.

It should be seen as another failure of this regime. A reminder of the terrible Gudbranson trade.

Tammer Pearson isn’t even good. He’s only led this team in points for months because the western conference sucks.

And because backup goalies

And because empty nets.

And because Mike Gillis brought in Horvat.

Just another failure of this regime. Someone quote this post and send it to Aquillini.