Jon Cooper says Kadri goal shouldn’t have counted, but wouldn’t say why

[Sol]

You have to be snorting some serious lines to think that was too many men

 

[Tasteless Beaver]

7v6 hockey!
Jon, you can't be mad at that. Yes they had 6 players on the ice from a veryyy loose line change, but your line change was even more egregious.

 

[Master P]

Maybe this?

 

[Cousin Eddie]

Actually the amount of Tampa guys on the ice outnumbered the Avs guys lol

 

[AvsFan29]

Didn't affect the play. Tampa also had 6 guys on during that change. Stop whining Cooper.

 

[Bruce Granville]

Not that blatant? I just seen the play Kadri was across the ice catching the lass just as I bekeuve the player he came off for was getting ti theb bench

Bekeuve ti theb?
Is that Dutch?

 

[A1LeafNation]

Cooper deflecting

 

[gn2007]

When you have the game sheet by nhl say 6 people for the avs well oops lol

 

[Rschmitz]

Did he also mention that they had 7 on the ice as well?
View attachment 561234

JFC so many tools in this forum. You're allowed to jump off the bench before another player comes off. IDK what Cooper is talking about though

 

[LOFIN]

It's the cup finals, obviously he's going to say that when there's the slightest chance of something going against your team. Kinda like how every play where your guy gets hurt is now dirty. It's not just Coop or Tampa.

As for this instance, the "too many men" had zero impact on the play. Zero. Maybe it's karma for Colorado from that disallowed goal back against the Sharks when Landy was "offside".

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

Kadri was on the other side of the ice catching the pass as his man was just getting ti the bench.

....That wasn't Kadri's man going for the change

 

[Tasteless Beaver]

When you have the game sheet by nhl say 6 people for the avs well oops lol

That six players includes the goalie, #35.

 

[wayninja]

Just watched the highlights. Was there any explanation for allowing that goal?

No, not even an attempt at one. I have no idea how that was allowed.

I mean, I get that you shouldn't whistle the play dead just because a player loses his helmet if a scoring chance is imminent, but not if a stick in the face causes the helmet loss...

I'm sure his heart is breaking over this as we speak.

 

[logan5]

By Cooper’s logic were even

View attachment 561236

What a weird thing to bitch about, a very debatable too many men as if the refs were going to call anything short of literal murder.

Need to back this shot up a few seconds. If Kadri is coming on the ice and plays the puck, while the player going off for him is still well on the ice, it's a penalty. It's a different thing if players changing are not involved in the play. Need more replays

 

[Mario_is_BACK!!]

 

[falconski]

Just watched the highlights. Was there any explanation for allowing that goal?

You don’t blow it dead if there’s an immediate scoring chance


Granted the mask being knocked off by a tampa player is another issue

 

[Bear of Bad News]

That six players includes the goalie, #35.

It doesn't. Count them again: 4, 6, 13, 42, 62, 91 (and 35).

With that said, Tampa also had six skaters (and a goalie) on at the time of the goal.

 

[Bear of Bad News]

Just watched the highlights. Was there any explanation for allowing that goal?

If you wave that off, every goaltender in the league is going to start wearing their masks as loose as possible.

I hated it as an Avalanche fan (and as a goaltender) but it is what it is.

 

[AvroArrow]

Jon Cooper is such a little bitch What is he crying about now, Tampa should have been on the PK for having 7 guys on the ice ?

 

[Mikeshane]

That's a tough one. I'd need to see a better video of when where the Colorado guy was when the replacement player came on the ice. The Avs player did seem quite far from the bench and involved in the play(that ended up being a goal) while the guy going off was still not right by the bench.

It's not just about how many guys are technically touching ice it's also about how involved are they impacting the play.

 

[Darren McCord]

To be fair he doesn’t experience losing often.

I mean how many coaches will have lost 2 cup finals in the last decade?

 

[MaKarter]

It was too many men. Avs had 6 on the ice.

 

[gn2007]

That six players includes the goalie, #35.

Keumper is number 35. So who is 4, 6, 13, 42, 62, 91. What colorado line has 6 players and 35 as a goalie please do tell

 

[Tasteless Beaver]

It doesn't. Count them again.

With that said, Tampa also had six skaters (and a goalie) on at the time of the goal.

Ah good call, but not necessarily accurate on the score card. He's a second or two from being off the ice, the goal was likely scored after. If it was called back, I would think Colorado comes out of that with a PP for the 7v6.

 

[Ncit3]

Maybe this?