This is just speculation and trying to inject opinion as fact.
What parts do you see as that?
"That style of decision making is common in businesses. And it is becoming more popular." That is fact. What the Coyotes are moving to is not new, go study how organizations are structured/changing.
I did also speculate based on that, I based my speculation on interviews, history of other teams, and other businesses. Some of that all comes together. Like in Chaykas interview where he talked about working with a partner before.
This is so idyllic that I want to frame it.
It just doesn't work out that way in the real world. Even if we follow your ideal example to the absolute letter, there will only ever be decisions made that are from a consensus (yeah, right). That leaves you blind on both flanks, where Chayka may have the correct view but because it is something Tippett opposes - like pretty much any scenario where the roster is weakened in the name of long term stability - it will never happen. The Yandle trade doesn't happen under this crap, pure and simple. Even though Yandle was wishy-washy about signing an extension, and Don made the correct call by cashing him in, it would have never happened under DTJC.
It takes people on equal footing in real terms to even attempt this, when Chayka is clearly outnumbered and also outclassed, thanks to his inexperience and age. You're buying into the window dressing hard. Nothing this organization or ownership group has ever done has given myself or many others here the impression that the Coyotes are going to be the ones to buck the trend of this sort of thing failing.
You're right that it's not entirely dysfunctional, because DT will largely be in charge and have the final say in everything. IA is framing it wrong. It's just that DT is a suboptimal choice for a rebuilding franchise. Given his penchant for whining and impatience, he's also the odds on favorite to **** it all up, because the stance required is opposite to his demonstrated behavior to date.
It does work that way in the real world. Chayka talked about it himself. Look at other teams like the Cardinals, Seahawks.
Obviously there are some moves where both won't be 100% on board. But the main point is with both making moves together, both having respect for each others views I don't see any boneheaded moves being made with this setup. That is why organizations choose to have this system for decision making, it's #1 Pro is to prevent dumb decisions.
Now don't get me wrong there still will be some mistakes made, every team makes them. I'm not foolish to think everything they do will be perfect. But I think it is a bit silly to go and be completely pessimistic and think the team is ruined. Which seems to be a popular belief, and anything to the contrary gets mockingly called "idyllic"