200 minutes out of 500 minutes is 40 %... That's a sufficient sample size considering the context (Larsson's season). It seems you constantly seem to have problems understanding the basics when the discussion is about statistics.
Yeah, I remember being told that I should feel nothing but joy about Larsson, when it was pretty clear that the eye-test showed his problems on defensive side of the game. And it didn't take that long that others noticed it.
You remember who advocated giving Larsson 8 year deal worth of 3,5 millions about a year ago? Or who said that Larsson (a year ago) was already better than Marcus Krüger?
It's definitely me who is wrong about Larsson all the time...
yea, we've got more than last season to consider...
And yes, Larsson is and remains better than Kruger (although the comparable overall is fair).