I did.
how can you even claim that, if you did then you would have realized that we can just buy out buff costing us nothingI did.
Sounds like a hassle. If the Jets want a team to take this guy off their hands they need to offer some sort of motivation to do so.Did you miss this part of the article or just choose to ignore it?
At the worst case, if Byfuglien refuses to report, then he will remain suspended without pay – at no salary cap consequence to the acquiring team. That team could then move to terminate Byfuglien’s contract, like the Jets can now, or opt to hold his rights into the summer to see if he has interest in resuming his career next season.
Then buy him out - why should another team deal with this without additional compensation?how can you even claim that, if you did then you would have realized that we can just buy out buff costing us nothing
Sounds like a hassle. If the Jets want a team to take this guy off their hands they need to offer some sort of motivation to do so.
When he can play he's great but that all seems to be in the past so why bother?The motivation is possibly getting that last year of the contract for a mammoth D-man who tilts the ice. There's literally no drawback to taking it since it can be terminated.
because the cost would be very low and you have a chance of getting an impact player for the playoffs and if he doesn't want to play then the team could just buy him out as well, but all this was covered in the article you said you read.When he can play he's great but that all seems to be in the past so why bother?
When he can play he's great but that all seems to be in the past so why bother?
When he can play he's great but that all seems to be in the past so why bother?
Wings are open for cap dump negotiations. Have absolutely no interest in the player.
I wonder how good that mammoth man's conditioning would be after a year offThe motivation is possibly getting that last year of the contract for a mammoth D-man who tilts the ice. There's literally no drawback to taking it since it can be terminated.
Buyouts cost quite a bit. The Jets can terminate his contract, which costs nothing. There's a world of difference. If you'd read the article...how can you even claim that, if you did then you would have realized that we can just buy out buff costing us nothing
I miss wrote something, if you look at the thread you would see 15 other post's where I said we can just terminate...Buyouts cost quite a bit. The Jets can terminate his contract, which costs nothing. There's a world of difference. If you'd read the article...
I wonder how good that mammoth man's conditioning would be after a year off
Can the Jets (legally) unilaterally terminate Buff’s contract though? They can, of course, try, but is it an absolute?Buyouts cost quite a bit. The Jets can terminate his contract, which costs nothing. There's a world of difference. If you'd read the article...
Can the Jets (legally) unilaterally terminate Buff’s contract though? They can, of course, try, but is it an absolute?
Can the Jets (legally) unilaterally terminate Buff’s contract though? They can, of course, try, but is it an absolute?
He refused to continue his rehab from injury. They can absolutey terminate. They're just grasping at straws trying to get an asset of any kind out of this.Can the Jets (legally) unilaterally terminate Buff’s contract though? They can, of course, try, but is it an absolute?
Is reading not a skillset on this site?The Kings should be all over this. A trade built like the Marleau to Carolina trade where another asset is included for the Kings taking him