Would be nice to see him put it together and that is exactly what this contract is asking him to do.
I think Capobianco will be the one waived. I assume that any of Capo, Stanley and Chisholm would get claimed, regardless of when they're placed on waivers.Wonder who we're losing this year to waivers.
Fixed it for you...Christ, we still have that LogStan on defense, huh?
He's a big guy, it's gonna take a professional to clear that blockage.Fixed it for you...
The scoring machine is back, all kidding aside all teams need a 7/8 D man during the season and we could do a lot worse
$1,000,000 would have been his qualifying offer. Not likely the player is willing to negotiate down from what was already on the table.
I’m not sure if any get claimed. Most teams have similar type D- men in the same 7/9 slot.I think Capobianco will be the one waived. I assume that any of Capo, Stanley and Chisholm would get claimed, regardless of when they're placed on waivers.
How is signing a player at his qualifying offer an overpay?I think it's a little bit of an overpay.
I get the microscope on Stan - he's the low hanging fruit for many fans -I just don't see it with Stanley, I've tried but he just makes too many mistakes in his own end of the ice. Starting the season with the Moose and playing alot may help a little but I'm just not seeing it with Stanley.
I get the microscope on Stan - he's the low hanging fruit for many fans -
But we have a few Dmen that make a lot of mistakes in their own end - and cost a lot more than $1M. We are not that great defensively.
Regardless, this signing looks a prep for a move at some point - Stan wants to play and unless they move Dillon, I don't see him having much of an opportunity to play outside of a fill in.
At $1M, there are likely teams that would take a shot at him for a 2nd or 3rd - or as a throw in that might sweeten a deal they are trying to make happen.
There's no cap hit hear for other teams - I can see interest in him with this contract - minimal downside.
This thread is largely a light for the Stanley-hating moths to flock to. His trajectory was looking good until he ran into injury problems, then when he came back he made some mistakes and after that there was no more second chances. The same thing happened to Harkens a couple of seasons ago. You can’t tell me that Appleton is better than Harkens.I get the microscope on Stan - he's the low hanging fruit for many fans -
But we have a few Dmen that make a lot of mistakes in their own end - and cost a lot more than $1M. We are not that great defensively.
Regardless, this signing looks a prep for a move at some point - Stan wants to play and unless they move Dillon, I don't see him having much of an opportunity to play outside of a fill in.
At $1M, there are likely teams that would take a shot at him for a 2nd or 3rd - or as a throw in that might sweeten a deal they are trying to make happen.
There's no cap hit hear for other teams - I can see interest in him with this contract - minimal downside.
The Jets have 9 D that require waivers...I think Capobianco will be the one waived. I assume that any of Capo, Stanley and Chisholm would get claimed, regardless of when they're placed on waivers.
It doesn't - valid point.how does his trade value gets altered in anyway if he is a pending RFA (1M - QO) vs on this 1M contract?