Fourier
Registered User
He is an RFA so he would have to be protected anyway. But if he still won't sign by the time of the draft, my guess is he becomes a Kraken.If he came back would we need to protect him for the expansion draft?
He is an RFA so he would have to be protected anyway. But if he still won't sign by the time of the draft, my guess is he becomes a Kraken.If he came back would we need to protect him for the expansion draft?
In the span of a year, Holland has managed to mostly undo two major Chiarelli mistakes (Lucic and JP).
Hard not to be impressed.
Yep.Love it. You can see why Holland has such a reputation as a good communicator. He knows how to frame things to compliment his audience, and turn negatives into positives.
Yep.
Which is why I was honestly so mad that even with Holland here Pulju and his agent was going all "nah screw you". Glad to see they realized who they were dealing with now.
I do think though that Yamamoto finding success and be given a chance to keep finding success probably changed a lot for Puljujarvi
Chia would of traded him and a 2nd for CaggiulaYamamoto said that Holland was clear to him when Holland sent him down to the AHL at the beginning of the season. Told him they were sending him down for half a year to get healthy and work on his overall game, and they would call him back up when he was ready.
Seems simple, but sometimes young players need that kind of clear direction to succeed.
Chia would have probably been holed up in his bunker saying "**** you, you went to Finland."
Chia would of traded him and a 2nd for Caggiula
Love it. You can see why Holland has such a reputation as a good communicator. He knows how to frame things to compliment his audience, and turn negatives into positives.
Yep.
Which is why I was honestly so mad that even with Holland here Pulju and his agent was going all "nah screw you". Glad to see they realized who they were dealing with now.
I do think though that Yamamoto finding success and be given a chance to keep finding success probably changed a lot for Puljujarvi
In the span of a year, Holland has managed to mostly undo two major Chiarelli mistakes (Lucic and JP).
Hard not to be impressed.
Holland did oroginally drop the ball with Puljujarvi. Within days of Puljujarvi publicly saying he was looking for a top 6 role and more offensive opportunities Holland holds a presser and states Puljujarvi will be starting on the third line. However many days after that Puljujarvi publicly states he is not going to play for Edmonton...
And who exactly is Jesse Puljujarvi to demand a top 6 role and more offensive opporunities? What has he accomplished in his time in the NHL to have expectations like that, where having to earn it from the third line is unacceptable?
I'd have been a lot more pissed if Holland had caved to a young player with draft pedigree's demands, like we're trying to lure Schultz into signing with us by promising top PP unit time. Especially after seeing it for years and years, regardless of who was in the front office. My praise for Holland is for making the right choice in saying "if you want it, you've gotta earn it" and not burning bridges when Jesse's camp started looking at jumping back over the Atlantic.
And? Yeah the team screwed him around. Doesn't mean him demanding top 6 time means he should get it. Holland was right, he saw him as a useful third line guy. Doesn't mean he can't excel past that. It was an immature take from PuljuHe was a tier 1 elite prospect who had been playing and succeeding against men at 17. At every point in his career he was an offensive weapon and used on the PP.
The list of prospects that were drafted with his talent and didn't even get a sniff of the top power play is incredibly short. On Edmonton alone there are likely over a dozen.
Jack Hughs was terrible this last year and had more opportunity in his one year than Jessie got in three.
As much as I despise Puljujarvi for his antics there is no doubt in my mind he was not given equal offensive opportunities as most other top prospects of his caliber.
He was a tier 1 elite prospect who had been playing and succeeding against men at 17. At every point in his career he was an offensive weapon and used on the PP.
The list of prospects that were drafted with his talent and didn't even get a sniff of the top power play is incredibly short. On Edmonton alone there are likely over a dozen.
Jack Hughs was terrible this last year and had more opportunity in his one year than Jessie got in three.
As much as I despise Puljujarvi for his antics there is no doubt in my mind he was not given equal offensive opportunities as most other top prospects of his caliber.
He was a tier 1 elite prospect who had been playing and succeeding against men at 17. At every point in his career he was an offensive weapon and used on the PP.
The list of prospects that were drafted with his talent and didn't even get a sniff of the top power play is incredibly short. On Edmonton alone there are likely over a dozen.
Jack Hughs was terrible this last year and had more opportunity in his one year than Jessie got in three.
As much as I despise Puljujarvi for his antics there is no doubt in my mind he was not given equal offensive opportunities as most other top prospects of his caliber.
Panarin must be a bum. Malkin also.Rightly or wrongly, if he comes back over I'll be reading a lot into how much his English has improved as an indicator of how committed he is to making it work in the NHL.
And if he turns into a great top six forward for us? Yam was a bust a year ago and now he's in almost everyone's heart who didn't believe in him
The following is quoted:
The Cult of Hockey’s Kurt Leavins, August 4: “How did we get to this point? There’s no question the organization has made its share of mistakes in developing the player. But the examples of stubbornness that Puljujarvi and his agent have displayed through these ‘negotiations’? Multiple observations and insider comments suggest to me that this same stubbornness showed up all-too frequently on the ice and in the dressing room as well. Examples: It has been described to me by multiple sources close to the team how Todd McLellan invested hours upon hours into trying to un-lock Puljujarvi when he first arrived in Edmonton. One of Todd’s frustrations was Jesse’s inconsistency in getting to the net. There, the player’s size & skill combination could be a real factor. When Puljujarvi would do this and was successful Todd would not miss the opportunity to praise him. He would point out how positioning on the play was critical. But then the next shift Puljujarvi would stubbornly appear back on the perimeter again. Todd got frustrated… Often, especially on the power play. Puljujarvi would repeatedly head to the wrong spot. He would literally bump into them. And when they would try to explain it to him their words of advice seemed to fall flat. Was he not listening…not understanding…or not agreeing? Eventually, although none of these players would ever dream of saying it in public…I am made to understand that they quietly asked just not to play with him anymore. There’s no suggestion they disliked him as a guy. Just that he was just hard to play with. Did Jesse perhaps just not understand? I think we’d all have time for that issue, right? Well…there has been a lot of ink spilled on Puljujarvi’s perceived language barrier. However, one particular person who was in that dressing room last season was asked about that very factor, and he answered: ‘No, he knows way more that he lets on”. That same person (who shall remain anonymous) was then asked, “So what’s the problem with Jesse, really”? The answer, shrugged back, was once again: ‘He’s just stubborn’.”
Found here: Jesse Puljujarvi trashed by MSM hockey commentators but still popular with most Edmonton Oilers fans | Edmonton Journal
I and many others on here have followed this player. Predraft, nhl, and ahl. I can't say I followed this player near as much as say Draisaitl or others in the past but I feel I've read a lot.
The quotes article is one of the very few negative ones about Puljujarvi. At the time and now I put very little stock in it and file it in the mostly conjecture category.
I've read multiple reports that Puljujarvi is a hard worker. Gym rat. Good at practice. That he wanted more offensive opportunity but was also happy when he had Strome with him. That his attention to detail on the defensive side of the puck is strong. That he was too good for the AHL. Dominate.
And then you get reports like the above. Extremly few and far between. Very speculative and with an interesting narrative.
I am confident McLellan was extremely stubborn. No idea about Puljujarvi. I am also confident McLellan was even more stubborn about the PP. I am confident even today no matter how great Puljujarvi is on the PP he does not make the cut because of the personal ahead of him. Nothing to do with him and more to do with the players ahead of him.
Puljujarvi on another team gets on almost any #1 PP in the league. He should have been given more opportunity in Edmonton to do so. I think it far more likely coaching stubbornness (McLellan) and depth kept him off more than his own shortcomings.
Who knows what the real situation is but I'll take the 10+ sources I've read over the years and what I've seen on the ice compared to that one. Especially with how this whole situation has played out I would have thought there would have been many many more rumors than we have seen
We will never know the truth.I and many others on here have followed this player. Predraft, nhl, and ahl. I can't say I followed this player near as much as say Draisaitl or others in the past but I feel I've read a lot.
The quotes article is one of the very few negative ones about Puljujarvi. At the time and now I put very little stock in it and file it in the mostly conjecture category.
I've read multiple reports that Puljujarvi is a hard worker. Gym rat. Good at practice. That he wanted more offensive opportunity but was also happy when he had Strome with him. That his attention to detail on the defensive side of the puck is strong. That he was too good for the AHL. Dominate.
And then you get reports like the above. Extremly few and far between. Very speculative and with an interesting narrative.
I am confident McLellan was extremely stubborn. No idea about Puljujarvi. I am also confident McLellan was even more stubborn about the PP. I am confident even today no matter how great Puljujarvi is on the PP he does not make the cut because of the personal ahead of him. Nothing to do with him and more to do with the players ahead of him.
Puljujarvi on another team gets on almost any #1 PP in the league. He should have been given more opportunity in Edmonton to do so. I think it far more likely coaching stubbornness (McLellan) and depth kept him off more than his own shortcomings.
Who knows what the real situation is but I'll take the 10+ sources I've read over the years and what I've seen on the ice compared to that one. Especially with how this whole situation has played out I would have thought there would have been many many more rumors than we have seen
I and many others on here have followed this player. Predraft, nhl, and ahl. I can't say I followed this player near as much as say Draisaitl or others in the past but I feel I've read a lot.
The quotes article is one of the very few negative ones about Puljujarvi. At the time and now I put very little stock in it and file it in the mostly conjecture category.
I've read multiple reports that Puljujarvi is a hard worker. Gym rat. Good at practice. That he wanted more offensive opportunity but was also happy when he had Strome with him. That his attention to detail on the defensive side of the puck is strong. That he was too good for the AHL. Dominate.
And then you get reports like the above. Extremly few and far between. Very speculative and with an interesting narrative.
I am confident McLellan was extremely stubborn. No idea about Puljujarvi. I am also confident McLellan was even more stubborn about the PP. I am confident even today no matter how great Puljujarvi is on the PP he does not make the cut because of the personal ahead of him. Nothing to do with him and more to do with the players ahead of him.
Puljujarvi on another team gets on almost any #1 PP in the league. He should have been given more opportunity in Edmonton to do so. I think it far more likely coaching stubbornness (McLellan) and depth kept him off more than his own shortcomings.
Who knows what the real situation is but I'll take the 10+ sources I've read over the years and what I've seen on the ice compared to that one. Especially with how this whole situation has played out I would have thought there would have been many many more rumors than we have seen
I and many others on here have followed this player. Predraft, nhl, and ahl. I can't say I followed this player near as much as say Draisaitl or others in the past but I feel I've read a lot.
The quotes article is one of the very few negative ones about Puljujarvi. At the time and now I put very little stock in it and file it in the mostly conjecture category.
I've read multiple reports that Puljujarvi is a hard worker. Gym rat. Good at practice. That he wanted more offensive opportunity but was also happy when he had Strome with him. That his attention to detail on the defensive side of the puck is strong. That he was too good for the AHL. Dominate.
And then you get reports like the above. Extremly few and far between. Very speculative and with an interesting narrative.
I am confident McLellan was extremely stubborn. No idea about Puljujarvi. I am also confident McLellan was even more stubborn about the PP. I am confident even today no matter how great Puljujarvi is on the PP he does not make the cut because of the personal ahead of him. Nothing to do with him and more to do with the players ahead of him.
Puljujarvi on another team gets on almost any #1 PP in the league. He should have been given more opportunity in Edmonton to do so. I think it far more likely coaching stubbornness (McLellan) and depth kept him off more than his own shortcomings.
Who knows what the real situation is but I'll take the 10+ sources I've read over the years and what I've seen on the ice compared to that one. Especially with how this whole situation has played out I would have thought there would have been many many more rumors than we have seen
How could you watch Oilers games and NOT see JP bumping into teamates, crowding their spots, and making a ton of illogical decisions?
That article makes a ton more sense with some of the testimonies that support the eye test, than your opinion that TM was the problem