Andrei79
Registered User
- Jan 25, 2013
- 15,244
- 27,201
Too bad he has trouble getting his shot off in games, cause KK has a rocket.Wow that looks a lot shorter than his usual stick. Working with Caufield on shooting would do him a lot of good.
Too bad he has trouble getting his shot off in games, cause KK has a rocket.Wow that looks a lot shorter than his usual stick. Working with Caufield on shooting would do him a lot of good.
I agree he gets the $5.5M.
And help with handling the puck in traffic, hopefully.Too bad he has trouble getting his shot off in games, cause KK has a rocket.
Unfortunately, PD didn’t get knocked off the top 6 podium, so he’ll likely get that. 5.5M. I don’t think they’ll plan out their center depth based on potential.I would prefer lower like others but he's worth what Anderson and Drouin are getting. I would limit the term to Suzuki and KK's bridge years. Then when we have to pay them, We might be able to let Danault go in his 30+ years.
Unfortunately, PD didn’t get knocked off the top 6 podium, so he’ll likely get that. 5.5M. I don’t think they’ll plan out their center depth based on potential.
of course KK will want a short term bridge. Suzuki will cash in if he has another season like this one, or better.
Danault will get better offers in the summer from other teams like Columbus,Wild maybe even the Rangers if they dont get a center via trade and i dont see Poehling spending another year in the AHLThere is no problem with his usage this year and many teams would love to have a center like that. $5.5M is the max and we prefer $5M or under. It's not worth losing him in the years where Suzuki and KK are maturing.
I'm fine with his 5/5 and PK time. We really do roll 3 lines so there is no top 6 on the Habs for a bit yet. The skilled ones get their extra time on the PP.
Danault will get better offers in the summer from other teams like Columbus,Wild maybe even the Rangers if they dont get a center via trade and i dont see Poehling spending another year in the AHL
All the Habs are doing is artificially inflating Danault's salary while holding back Kotkaniemi.There is no problem with his usage this year and many teams would love to have a center like that. $5.5M is the max and we prefer $5M or under. It's not worth losing him in the years where Suzuki and KK are maturing.
I'm fine with his 5/5 and PK time. We really do roll 3 lines so there is no top 6 on the Habs for a bit yet. The skilled ones get their extra time on the PP.
All the Habs are doing is artificially inflating Danault's salary while holding back Kotkaniemi.
I'm a fan of Danault but I don't think it's realistic or wise to retain him at that kind of money.
Not sure how you can look at the current situation, factor in that Danault will be getting a RAISE, which essentially locks his spot into the top 6, and conclude that there's room for all 3.Nope. There is room for KK in the top 3 mix and he gets more time on the PP vs Danault. Danault is not blocking KK, KK is blocking KK. He has to win more puck battles and faceoffs as a starting point.
I'm sorry I don't understand coaching quite like you do, what with all your experience coaching at the NHL level..You don't understand coaching. We went through this over and over again. We are not the Sens where we will just play them and let them learn on the job. It's not a 100% rebuilding team and you are confused by that. KK will have to earn his way like pretty much every single NHL player. He's not on a rocket upward type trajectory like some hope. I think he will be fine but it's going to be growing pains. Until then, we will need Danault in our mix.
If you commit to Danault...trade Kotkaniemi to bolster your defense or top 6.Stop using the Danault excuse as to why KK is not where you think he should be. Leave Danault alone. He's worth around $5M. Complaining about that is nonsense. And you really going to let him walk for $500k? Trying to pretend that Danault is only worth $4M or less is crazy talk. $5M is the right number. $4.5M is a great value and $5.5M is slight overpayment. Reality
Not sure how you can look at the current situation, factor in that Danault will be getting a RAISE, which essentially locks his spot into the top 6, and conclude that there's room for all 3.
Suzuki and Danault will continue to get the bulk of the even strength minutes and the challenges that Kotkaniemi needs to grow into the player they drafted.
I'm sorry I don't understand coaching quite like you do, what with all your experience coaching at the NHL level..
But I'm not naïve enough to think that players "earn" their roles.
That's a load of bullshit for media and fans to consume.
Danault didn't earn shit and he found himself on the Habs top line with Radulov and Pacioretty.
So miss me with that.
If you commit to Danault...trade Kotkaniemi to bolster your defense or top 6.
Otherwise...Danaukt will have to accept a salary that represents his value going forward (#3 C).
Neither Suzuki or Danault "earned" their spots.It's not rocket science. You sign Danault for the years of when Suzuki and KK approach their prime years... which will be bridge years. $4.5M - $5.5M for 3 or 4 years and you roll 3 lines 5/5 and Suzuki and KK get extra time on the PP while Danault gets PK time.
Now, if Danault pushes for $6M and don't budge while Evans plays very well in this playoffs, I'd consider letting him walk. I would really test to see how much Danault really wants to stay a Habs. I don't think he wants to leave
Danault is not blocking KK. That is false. KK will have to earn his spot like Suzuki did which is ahead of Danault.
Funny part about this is if you go to our conversations last offseason, I even told you, don't expect Kotkaniemi to take a step forward this coming year as long as he was playing behind Suzuki and Danault.Nope. There is room for KK in the top 3 mix and he gets more time on the PP vs Danault. Danault is not blocking KK, KK is blocking KK. He has to win more puck battles and faceoffs as a starting point.
You don't understand coaching. We went through this over and over again. We are not the Sens where we will just play them and let them learn on the job. It's not a 100% rebuilding team and you are confused by that. KK will have to earn his way like pretty much every single NHL player. He's not on a rocket upward type trajectory like some hope. I think he will be fine but it's going to be growing pains. Until then, we will need Danault in our mix.
Stop using the Danault excuse as to why KK is not where you think he should be. Leave Danault alone. He's worth around $5M. Complaining about that is nonsense. And you really going to let him walk for $500k? Trying to pretend that Danault is only worth $4M or less is crazy talk. $5M is the right number. $4.5M is a great value and $5.5M is slight overpayment. Reality
Neither Suzuki or Danault "earned" their spots.
It was handed to them and they took it and ran (especially Danault).
Danault had 5prs in 21 games to finish his first year playing 4th line and then somehow ended up the #1C the following year.
Stop it.
The simple fact that you're trying to convince people that he's better than the 4th line center - who's also at his worst right now - should be ample proof that he's not a dynamic player for the time being. Add to that the turnovers and he's a liability.
As for reports, I know for sure you've seen them as you are an avid hockey fan. Seems like a flippant remark to me.
Jesperi Kotkaniemi aurait demandé à Shea Weber de s’occuper de Claude Julien
Neither Suzuki or Danault "earned" their spots.
It was handed to them and they took it and ran (especially Danault).
Danault had 5prs in 21 games to finish his first year playing 4th line and then somehow ended up the #1C the following year.
Stop it.
playing for ottawa is a far superior situation. Ive heard it all
tkachuk would do even better playing for the Habs then what he is doing right now for ottawa
Need to wait and see, Andrighetto looked gangbusters w Avs after being dealt, and posters were loosing their minds. 1-season later he was on his way out.
Lol ok...I guess they didn't teach you how to have civil debates in those NHL coaching seminars.I disagree that neither of Suzuki or Danault earned their spots. Conversation over
Eric Staal is the Douglas Murray of forwards. We are thoroughly outplayed when he's on the ice. He's a huge liability. KK may not be producing points but he at least drives play to the other team's zone. There's just absolutely no way he should be in the lineup ahead of KK.
Btw, plus minus stats are useless.
He started out on the 4th like but didn't spend too much time there.I seem to remember that Danault started a season on the 4th line with Torrey Mitchell, and he was producing very well on it. That may have been the year where he eventually moved up the lineup for good.
I don't think he ever went into a camp where he was handed the number one job with 5 points in 21 games or whatever it was.
I hope you realize that's a crock. Suzuki started off on the 4th line last year when KK was on the third. Suzuki earned his way up the lineup. KK earned his way into the press box.Neither Suzuki or Danault "earned" their spots.
It was handed to them and they took it and ran (especially Danault).
Danault had 5prs in 21 games to finish his first year playing 4th line and then somehow ended up the #1C the following year.
Stop it.
How did he "earn" his icetime?I hope you realize that's a crock. Suzuki started off on the 4th line last year when KK was on the third. Suzuki earned his way up the lineup. KK earned his way into the press box.