All right, no more Bobby talk from me.
I know that you know and I know that many know what we know, you know?I always know who you mean and pretty sure many do.
I know that you know and I know that many know what we know, you know?
Or maybe, y'know, it's just you
I know that none of you know and I also know that I know but I don't know all.I know that you know and I know that many know what we know, you know?
Listen, Bub.
Revisionist history, there was like five person who liked the pick at the time, most of the people had their panties in a bunch over Zad and TkaRemember the video of the girl shockingly dissapointed at the draft that Montreal took Kotkaniemi? I mean at the time an astute hockey fan would know a) that Kotkaniemi was a legit prospect and b) based on her reaction it was evident her level of knowledge was bare minimum.
But I'd like to see a reporter track her down and interview her. It would be amusing.
He's that guy who said we will regret passing him over for Koko.Who's that?
He really could get calder nom consideration if keeps it up!
Revisionist history, there was like five person who liked the pick at the time, most of the people had their panties in a bunch over Zad and Tka
The third spot is 100% open. He's three points off the lead at this point, why wouldn't he get one ? He's also been heating up offensively.No he won’t
Edit: consideration. Sure
No doubt. I think the disparity was greater when you ventured off to the main boards.5 is an understatement. It wasnt a majority, but we were quite a few who liked the pick.
No doubt. I think the disparity was greater when you ventured off to the main boards.
Here, lots of us debunked the idea Kotkaniemi wasn't considered a top-5 worthy pick by the people who really mattered (ie. McKenzie's polled scouts, Sharks'(or was it Dallas) head scout going on record on 690, that they had him up there too, Chayka confirming post-draft he was their 1st choice etc.
Whoa, wait what?
He and Bryan Wilde were just regurgitating what Grant was saying. Luckily, this time it wasn't Michael McLeod.Jack Todd publicly called for the KK pick back on April 29.
I know that many posters here serious issues with good-old-Jack.
Personally, I don't.
Jack Todd: Finnish centreman Jesperi Kotkaniemi could fill a big hole in Habs' lineup
They were zadina's billet family and were habs fans, we does everyone bring this up ...Remember the video of the girl shockingly dissapointed at the draft that Montreal took Kotkaniemi? I mean at the time an astute hockey fan would know a) that Kotkaniemi was a legit prospect and b) based on her reaction it was evident her level of knowledge was bare minimum.
But I'd like to see a reporter track her down and interview her. It would be amusing.
My point. The know-nothing fans (ie the girl with the clueless look of bewilderment) can now eat their crow.No doubt. I think the disparity was greater when you ventured off to the main boards.
Here, lots of us debunked the idea Kotkaniemi wasn't considered a top-5 worthy pick by the people who really mattered (ie. McKenzie's polled scouts, Sharks'(or was it Dallas) head scout going on record on 690, that they had him up there too, Chayka confirming post-draft he was their 1st choice etc.
No doubt. I think the disparity was greater when you ventured off to the main boards.
Here, lots of us debunked the idea Kotkaniemi wasn't considered a top-5 worthy pick by the people who really mattered (ie. McKenzie's polled scouts, Sharks'(or was it Dallas) head scout going on record on 690, that they had him up there too, Chayka confirming post-draft he was their 1st choice etc.
They were zadina's billet family and were habs fans, we does everyone bring this up ...
They were zadina's billet family and were habs fans, we does everyone bring this up ...