Player Discussion Jesperi Kotkaniemi Part 16

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zorba

Registered User
May 26, 2011
11,505
7,208
DELTA BC
Maybe but we drafted him as a long term center prospect so at age 20, are we at the long term point yet? I think not. Most of us said that others will be better faster than KK when we drafted him.

It's too early to act like experts but we can guess
No they didn’t. No one drafts 3rd overall thinking let’s give him 5 years. That gm could be gone in 5 years. They drafted need over best player available. Tkachuk or Hughes make the this team better now.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
68,380
26,078
East Coast
No they didn’t. No one drafts 3rd overall thinking let’s give him 5 years. That gm could be gone in 5 years. They drafted need over best player available. Tkachuk or Hughes make the this team better now.

Haha... many on our boards talked about the long term prospect narrative when we drafted him and many others would have flipped out if we took Tkachuk. There were some high on Hughes. I remember that.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
23,075
15,427
How is it laughable? His skating has barely improved and he takes too long to make decisions with the puck on his stick. His shot is hard but he can’t release it before a defender gets a stick on the puck. I expect the strength to increase and not to fall over all the time, but the other two are not going to get much better if at all. To me it indicates a flawed 2nd line centre. If you’re happy with that, fine. To me it’s two disappointments by Timmins at 3rd overall. It’s inexcusable, combined with the constant 1st round failures from 2010-2017.

20 years old.

Yet you seem to think 2 areas of improvement that are extremely elastic are somehow set in stone for him... & ground your criticism and frustration in that poor assessment.

That's what's laughable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs178

Zorba

Registered User
May 26, 2011
11,505
7,208
DELTA BC
Haha... many on our boards talked about the long term prospect narrative when we drafted him and many others would have flipped out if we took Tkachuk. There were some high on Hughes. I remember that.
If you have to wait 5 years for. 3rd OA , he’s a bust Tkachuk was the BPA. We chose need Its backfired. A top 4 wing core of Tkachuk,Gallagher, Caufield and Anderson /tofolli would be f***ing scary
 

Andrei79

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
15,295
27,335
Thing is, no one on the roster ahead of him "has what it takes"... and rather than do what any smart team does as far as nurturing confidence and growth in prized young players (by controlling what you can control, like consistent ice time/linemates and showing some patience with to-be-expected up's and downs... as we did/have with Suzuki pretty much all year), JKO for some odd reason has been treated like a spare part.

After CJ was fired, JKO started getting both more ice time and better linemates.... he translated that into 7 pts in 10 games... then had a 3-game stretch without a point (still 7pts/13 games, better than Tkachuk productivity ;) ), and what happens? Our genius GM trades for an "upgrade" in Staal and our even brighter coach proceedes to slide JKO to the wing for a few games.

Kid takes it in stride, saying all the right things...

Many of the usual suspects around here dismissed that yo-yoing as no big deal...

and he's put up 5 pts in the 17 games since, while bouncing from C to W, and a revolving door of wingers almost every game since.

Some of you clearly have no concept of athlete development or confidence development in young professionals... i guess with no experience in the subject matter it would be easy to assume that if line switching works with no impact or difference on players related to their age/experience in EA sports, the same should be true in real life.

It isn't. Confidence takes time to build in most athletes. As the broadcast team (ex-players) spoke to last night as far as Thornton's impact in Toronto, there is absolutely something to experience as it relates to dealing with the grind of a season, fighting through slumps, elevating play to deal with late season/playoffs et. Not ALL young players struggle with that, just like not ALL veterans automatically develop it through experience alone.

But with a young player? No different than with a young/inexperienced person in any field, you adjust your expectations and create more space for nurturing/patience/confidence growth early on if you feel the talent is worth investing in. Later on, then sure, short leash and "next man up"...

but for now? To look at how JKO has been used and treated this year and be disappointed, or equate production inconsistency as a sign of his limitations with no appreciation or consideration of the difficult context he's been put in? that's just silly.

Just take a look at Ottawa. Remember how much some were laughing at them early on? Yet here we are late in the season, winners of 6 of their last 8 games, several young players playing with confidence and impact... guys who at various times during the year (including the darling Tkachuk) who went on dry spells as long as any JKO has seen this year WITHOUT their minutes getting slashed or being thrown into unecessary line blenders.

That stuff matters, even if some of you prefer to ignore it.

If you just watch his overall game, it's very obvious that:
- he's got good/great vision and hockey sense
- he competes hard in all phases of the game
- he's got above average set of tools
- he's awkward in the ways that a lanky youth whose skill/head are further advanced than his body when it comes to competing professionally
- he's extremmely coachable

those traits together, for a 20 year old playing regular NHL minutes, deservedly so, point unequivocally to a player with a huge amount of progression ahead of him.

That our mediocre roster needs more "right now" impact players both on offense and defense, has nothing to do with him. Replace Danault with a top-tier NHL C, and this entire conversation does not exist.
Put JKO on Ottawa and give him Tkachuk's leash and support, and the most likely outcome would be that their P/60, which is almost equal now (1.63 vs 1.6), would be far more in JKO's favour... opportunity & consistency matter.

Tough to say anything more. Another excellent post Miller. I feel you contextualize the situation very well.
 

Habs Icing

Formerly Onice
Jan 17, 2004
19,602
11,302
Montreal
Lol. You make it sound like 5 pts in 17 games is good Byron has 7 pts in his last 17 games and he’s considered fodder.
5 pts. Wow. Low low standards. That’s a 27 pts pace. Awful
And what's not pointed out is whether KK was a driver or a passenger with those 5 points.
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
20,710
11,318
I am not overly impressed by KK... BUT, I always tell myself that he is still only 20-21, has still lots to learn, and was RUSHED to NHL level to fill gapping holes on the f***ing Habs centerline, left desert for two decades because of improper scouting and drafting, mainly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
75,217
45,085
Well, I had a bunch of multiquotes and was in the middle of replying. Dog stepped on the keyboard and POOF away it goes.

So anyways, the main points:

- Totally agree that we are doing a crappy job developing him
- Thought he played great coming up until we cut his ice and screwed with his head
- Thought he played great after the coaching change before we tanked and picked up Staal
- Still think he's going to be a beast
- Tkachuk and Quinn may very well be better picks... doesn't really matter to me
- We need to do a better job on development overall - regardless of whether this guy was the right pick or not. Give him, Suzuki and CC every chance to succeed.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
23,075
15,427
Well, I had a bunch of multiquotes and was in the middle of replying. Dog stepped on the keyboard and POOF away it goes.

So anyways, the main points:

- Totally agree that we are doing a crappy job developing him
- Thought he played great coming up until we cut his ice and screwed with his head
- Thought he played great after the coaching change before we tanked and picked up Staal
- Still think he's going to be a beast
- Tkachuk and Quinn may very well be better picks... doesn't really matter to me
- We need to do a better job on development overall - regardless of whether this guy was the right pick or not. Give him, Suzuki and CC every chance to succeed.

add Romanov

any shot this franchise has at being relevant in the playoffs in the next 3-5 years depends heavily on how quickly and how effectively those 4 can hit their stride and get close to their potential.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
75,217
45,085
add Romanov

any shot this franchise has at being relevant in the playoffs in the next 3-5 years depends heavily on how quickly and how effectively those 4 can hit their stride and get close to their potential.
The wingers are there to help. It's a good group. The D is poison.
 

angusyoung

Back in the day, I was always horny!
Aug 17, 2014
11,690
11,950
Heirendaar
And what's not pointed out is whether KK was a driver or a passenger with those 5 points.


1574458333.gif
 

Habs

We should have drafted Michkov
Feb 28, 2002
21,268
14,808
The thing I'll remember most about that draft year isn't Bustniemi, but the girl behind him with the short skirt and the 'what the hell did they just do' lady

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad