Thank you.One thing I’ve never understood.
“He didn’t want to win, he wanted to make money”
A. Duh. It’s a business, not a charity.
B. How is it a one thing or the other proposition? Success breeds money in this business with everyone except dumb leaf fans who toss their jerseys on the ice and then run to the pro shop for a new one.
One thing I’ve never understood.
“He didn’t want to win, he wanted to make money”
A. Duh. It’s a business, not a charity.
B. How is it a one thing or the other proposition? Success breeds money in this business with everyone except dumb leaf fans who toss their jerseys on the ice and then run to the pro shop for a new one.
One thing I’ve never understood.
“He didn’t want to win, he wanted to make money”
A. Duh. It’s a business, not a charity.
B. How is it a one thing or the other proposition? Success breeds money in this business with everyone except dumb leaf fans who toss their jerseys on the ice and then run to the pro shop for a new one.
From 1975 to 2007 this team was run with only one thing in mind. Make JJ as much money as possible. Winning didn’t matter, the fans didn’t matter, the city didn’t matter, nothing did except loading up JJ’s pockets with cash. Widely considered one of the worst owners in pro sports and especially in hockey with Bill Wirtz and Harold Ballard as his only rivals for the title. Jacobs plundered Bruins fans at every opportunity. He only started caring about winning when the building was half empty and the season ticket base under 4000. If Boston was Toronto and the fans continued to fill the building they would still suck and JJ still couldn’t be picked out of a lineup by Bruins fans because he only made yearly trips to Boston.
Teams was always a player away but the extra money never spent to get that player, his henchman Sinden making sure he did JJ Corleones dirty work for him. While he may have tried to remake his image in the past few years the damage he did to this team should never be forgiven. EVER.
And this is still nicer than the Devil’s favorite demon deserves. Not enough bad things can happen to JJ, sadly he seems to have avoided all of them.
Merchandising wasn't as big until the mid nineties, NHL profits were based on ticket sales, parking and concessions. If you could put out a team that was a couple players short, or just one, and save that salary but make the same money, why spend money on that player. You are sold out and making the playoffs, winning the cup or making the final amde similar money, if you could do it cheap and not add a player and pocket the money you did it. JJ sure did.Somehow these 2 points don't jive.
One of worst owners in sport, but team is always a player away. Always being one player away implies to me that the team was always very good.
This line of thought always confounded me. Why would a guy that knows how to make money hand over fist not try to win the Cup when its always so close? Winning the Cup is a gold mine for ticket sales and merchandising.
You are trying to defend someone who was indefensible (unless you were an investor and hated the Bruins) throughout the late 70's, 80's and 90's and the early 200's until the salary cap. If there was no cap this team would be totally irrelevant while the Rangers, Red Wings, Leafs and now Blackhawks without Wirtz won year after year by spending. Look up salaries in those years and see where the Bruins were.
"
The Leafs, without Ballard and with the money they make they would have been top contenders year after year. Yes you need good management but you need good ownership first, that wasn't Harold Ballard, with ownership straightened out and no cap they Leafs I believe would be perpetual contenders and have won a Cup or two. The Bruins, with Jacobs and no cap, would not, unless he sold.Leafs? The LEAFS!!?? Win "year after year"? The Leafs couldn't win in the no cap era in the high flying 80s.
Go home Fenian. You're drunk.
Yes, changing reality will always prove your argument.The Leafs, without Ballard and with the money they make they would have been top contenders year after year. Yes you need good management but you need good ownership first, that wasn't Harold Ballard, with ownership straightened out and no cap they Leafs I believe would be perpetual contenders and have won a Cup or two. The Bruins, with Jacobs and no cap, would not, unless he sold.
But that is the point. You are posing hypotheticals that can’t be proven to further your hatred of Jacobs.Ah more insight, let's go with another hypothetical as I used with the Leafs. If you are as mouthy and annoying in person as you are behind a keyboard you would have gotten all that training to be heavyweight champ, that I am sure of.
The way Jacobs ran this team, that coincided with my whole time as a fan of them, is reason enough to hate him. I still say without a cap JJ stays the same and the Bruins don't win a Cup. there was no proof at any point he had interest in winning one until the bottom fell out on attendance.But that is the point. You are posing hypotheticals that can’t be proven to further your hatred of Jacobs.
Again. A hypothetical that didn’t happen that you can’t prove. I am not defending the guy but you are just making stuff up.The way Jacobs ran this team, that coincided with my whole time as a fan of them, is reason enough to hate him. I still say without a cap JJ stays the same and the Bruins don't win a Cup. there was no proof at any point he had interest in winning one until the bottom fell out on attendance.
It's a ******* hypothetical, what isn't is how this team was run until the salary cap era.Again. A hypothetical that didn’t happen that you can’t prove. I am not defending the guy but you are just making stuff up.
The Leafs? Yeesh
Merchandising wasn't as big until the mid nineties, NHL profits were based on ticket sales, parking and concessions. If you could put out a team that was a couple players short, or just one, and save that salary but make the same money, why spend money on that player. You are sold out and making the playoffs, winning the cup or making the final amde similar money, if you could do it cheap and not add a player and pocket the money you did it. JJ sure did.
Want some examples?
Geoff Courtnall
Joe Juneau
Jason Allison
Bill Guerin
Anson Carter
That is just off the top of my head.
Mike Illitch calling the way JJ ran the bruins a disgrace.
I can't find a source for the quote but I always recall JJ saying winning a cup cost to much.
You are trying to defend someone who was indefensible (unless you were an investor and hated the Bruins) throughout the late 70's, 80's and 90's and the early 200's until the salary cap. If there was no cap this team would be totally irrelevant while the Rangers, Red Wings, Leafs and now Blackhawks without Wirtz won year after year by spending. Look up salaries in those years and see where the Bruins were.
Even Dale Arnold, who acts like he desperately wanted to be Jacobs child 7, didn't defend him with the vigor he normally does, saying what amounted for Dale to a scathing criticism of "they could spend more money"
2001-02 | $5,100,000 | $7,213,721 | |
2002-03 | $8,732,891 | $12,160,029 | |
2003-04 | $8,866,445 | $12,070,894 | |
2004-05 | Lockout year: Season cancelled - no NHL salary paid. | ||
2005-06 | $6,738,498 | $8,935,912 |
Glad you agreeIt's a ******* hypothetical, what isn't is how this team was run until the salary cap era.