If Gudbranson has a monster game in game 1 of the season.. and I say "Wow, great game Gudbranson"...
Guarnteed that people here would rather react with a sarcastic post including the words "Norris trophy", or "$12mil"... to deflect discussing the game in the moment.
It is the typical "imprortant to win the internet" reaction.
Its also somehow related to big influx of debate pre-pre-season for reason.. everyone getting their final licks in before the firat game here to let everyine know qhere they stand in case anyone had forgotten over the summer.
^you are trying too hard now...
That isn't analogous to what happened here.
This would be a comparable analogy
1) Gudbranson scores a goal and looks amazing in the home opener
2) RonningMorrisonBooth declares that "Gudbranson haters' have now been proven wrong"
3) Someone flippantly replies "Yeah, it looks like Gudbranson is a Norris trophy contender, since he's on pace for 82 goals. You're totally right."
4) You go "Ugh! I agree that telling people to eat crow based on one game is premature, but you're using an extreme to distract from the actual point!"
4 wouldn't make any sense and would similarly be a poor case of remark/ridicule comprehension. The extreme/exaggeration IS directly addressing the actual point, because that's how ridicule works.
Rather than just charging past my point, rolling your eyes, and letting all of your dismissive assumptions about people's biases/narratives inform what you buy/don't buy, tell me what you think is logically inaccurate about that, specifically, without all the baggage.
Maybe this will help:
1) Gaunce scores a goal and looks amazing in the home opener
2) MS declares that "Gaunce haters' have now been proven wrong"
3) krutovsdonut flippantly replies "Yeah, it looks like Gaunce is a Hart Trophy contender, since he's on pace for 82 goals. You're totally right."
4) CanaFan goes "Ugh! I agree that telling people to eat crow based on one game is premature, but you're using an extreme to distract from the actual point!"
Would CanaFan be right or wrong to react that way?