It’s incomprehensible that we were chasing Subban in 2016, Stamkos in 2017, Tavares in 2018 when we were (theoretically) in the middle of a rebuild but now, at a point where we should be coming out of that rebuild, and have cap space to throw at the best high-end UFA group ever ... we’re now not interested in high-end UFAs.
Literally everything these morons do is backward.
I’m not sure if this is management’s line of thinking, but here is my guess:
Back in 2016 - the Canucks literally had no future core’ pieces outside of Horvat. Period. They needed a guaranteed future core piece in the worst way possible even if said players’ AAV was sky high.
2017 and 2018: The Canucks had Horvat, Boeser, and a few longshot hopefuls, but the future core of this team (and more specifically, the Center Ice position) was still very much up in air and had a lot of questions. Pettersson had talent through the wazoo, but how long would it take for him to transition to the NHL? Would he be a Superstar? Would he be able to play Center? Who was going to replace Henrik?
2019: The future Canucks core seems to be set. Pettersson is a worthy heir apparent to Hank. Pettersson, Horvat, and Gaudette will give the Canucks great depth down the middle, while 2/3 of Markstrom, Demko, and DiPietro will solidify the teams’ goaltending position. Hutton and Stecher emerged, while Hughes looks like he’ll be a top 4 dman.
2016-2018 emphasis: desperately acquire future core pieces even if you have to pay them at a premium. Future core is up in air.
2019 emphasis: Future core = set. No need to pay a premium price for future core pieces via UFA. Try and sign core to cap friendly contracts. Bring in complementary pieces to increase depth while also keeping overall AAV’s low. ‘Placeholder’ contracts (ie Sutter, etc.,) will all be off the books by the time the RFA core players (Pettersson, Hughes, etc.) need to be reupped.
That would be my interpretation of Benning’s thought process but perhaps I’m wrong.