Player Discussion Jake DeBrusk II

[Rubber Biscuit]

DeBrusk for Boeser?

I'd rather have Boeser skating opposite DeBrusk for the next decade

 

[tonino2424]

I'd rather have Boeser skating opposite DeBrusk for the next decade

Agree 100% but what do we have that we can realistically trade for Boeser

 

[Rubber Biscuit]

Agree 100% but what do we have that we can realistically trade for Boeser

Idk. I have no idea what the Canucks might be looking for. I think their cap situation is pretty bad as far as I know, but I could be wrong

 

[Mr. Make-Believe]

I’ve missed something... why are the Canucks looking at trading Boeser?

 

[MattFromFranklin]

DeBrusk for Boeser?

Boeser is a superior player and I doubt Benning would be stupid enough to make that deal.

 

[WestCoastBruinsFan]

I’ve missed something... why are the Canucks looking at trading Boeser?

Apparently it is cap related. Players with NMC’s etc.

 

[TwineTickler]

I’ve missed something... why are the Canucks looking at trading Boeser?

Just a twitter rumor... who knows if there is any truth to it. Doesn't make any sense to me. He should be attached to Petterson for the next 10 years

 

[JOKER 192]

Apparently it is cap related. Players with NMC’s etc.

Which pretty much rules the Bruins out as trade partners given the tight cap situation in Boston.

 

[ON3M4N]

Boeser is a superior player and I doubt Benning would be stupid enough to make that deal.

Is he though? Last 3 seasons per 60 at 5v5

Player​

G/60​

A/60​

Pts/60​

S/60​

SH%​

ixG/60​

iCF/60​

iSCF/60​

iHDCF/60​

Rush/60​

Reb/60​

GvA/60​

TkA/60​

Hits/60​

Blks/60​

Boeser​

1.01​

1.03​

2.04​

7.73​

13.02​

0.67​

14.14​

8.26​

3.16​

0.48​

0.71​

1.33​

1.76​

1.51​

1.28​

DeBrusk​

1.01​

0.94​

1.95​

8.68​

11.65​

0.73​

14.53​

8.13​

3.67​

0.75​

0.85​

1.48​

2.12​

3.32​

1.46​

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

​

They look pretty close to me....certainly wouldn't say Boeser is "superior" to DeBrusk

 

[Mr. Make-Believe]

Apparently it is cap related. Players with NMC’s etc.

If it is cap related, I can’t imagine DeBrusk and his expiring contract being of any value to the Canucks.

They’ll find a way to ditch some deadweight far before they let a guy like Boeser go. Oh well... so much for that dream.

 

[Mr. Make-Believe]

Boeser is a superior player and I doubt Benning would be stupid enough to make that deal.

I was actually going to suggest DeBrusk and Lauzon. It stings, but so it should and Boeser would fit here like a glove.

However, see above post...

 

[danpantz]

We should have just drafted both of them together when we had the chance damnit

 

[the negotiator]

I was actually going to suggest DeBrusk and Lauzon. It stings, but so it should and Boeser would fit here like a glove.

However, see above post...

That would hurt....which is why it is probably fair value

 

[ON3M4N]

I was actually going to suggest DeBrusk and Lauzon. It stings, but so it should and Boeser would fit here like a glove.

However, see above post...

Would be an over-payment, no? I mean per my post above, DeBrusk per/60 is as good as Boeser has been over the last 3 years.

 

[rocketdan9]

Jake "the hero" Debrusk

Clutch playoff goals after clutch playoff goals

Tonights ice breaker 1st .... gave me that Bobby Orr vibe

Resign the man

 

[DKH]

We should have just drafted both of them together when we had the chance damnit

Life is balance

their powerplay

Pastrnak 25th overall
McAvoy 15th overall
Bergeron 2nd round
Krejci 2nd round
Marchand 3rd round
Krug college FA

 

[DKH]

DeBrusk do much better playing with Coyle, Kase, Studnicka who play all over the offensive zone causing DeBrusk to be more focused/engaged

his third period reminded me of Tyler Seguin’s style of game

 

[JCRO]

Anything north of 4.... Please Don’t.

 

[dafoomie]

Doesn't utilize his size and doesn't see the ice well. I'm ready to move on.

 

[missingchicklet]

Doesn't utilize his size and doesn't see the ice well. I'm ready to move on.

I don't if I'm ready to move on without a credible replacement on a line that is already saddled with a RW who can't score. I 100 percent agree that Jake doesn't use his size as well as he should, and his lack of seeing the ice well drives me nuts.

 

[Trap Jesus]

Doesn't utilize his size and doesn't see the ice well. I'm ready to move on.

He's a very odd player. His game is almost entirely based around his speed and acceleration to loose pucks, and he has good touch around the net. He's also a very inconsistent player in terms of getting up for certain games but not others. Every other aspect of the game he struggles at though. I think he can be effective in the right situation as a 2nd line winger, but this certainly isn't the spot for it playing with Krejci and whichever plug they're putting in on the right side.

 

[DKH]

Jakes the biggest tease since Missy Malone in my 9th grade History class

 

[DKH]

He's a very odd player. His game is almost entirely based around his speed and acceleration to loose pucks, and he has good touch around the net. He's also a very inconsistent player in terms of getting up for certain games but not others. Every other aspect of the game he struggles at though. I think he can be effective in the right situation as a 2nd line winger, but this certainly isn't the spot for it playing with Krejci and whichever plug they're putting in on the right side.

Yup

Coyle does what Coyle does almost independent of his wingers - Coyle can drive a line with puck possession

I Make Krejci my Islanders version of Pageau - third line and on first PP

 

[JCRO]

Anything north of 4.... Please Don’t.

I want to clarify.

I want to keep him. But not at a high AAV.

And obviously if he’s moved, it would need to be for a legit top 6. Which will cost him + some pieces

I don’t think he’s going anywhere though.

 

[Over the volcano]

Jakes the biggest tease since Missy Malone in my 9th grade History class

Getting Kessel flashbacks - so much seems right there but never quite.