King of Anarchy
Registered User
Trade Jensen, 1st, Gaunce for Vanek at 50% salary
You know he's a UFA next summer.. right?
Trade Jensen, 1st, Gaunce for Vanek at 50% salary
Ehrhoff got a 10 year term, which Gillis did not want to give him.
Torres wanted more than the $1 million he initially signed for, he got that in Phoenix.
You know he's a UFA next summer.. right?
Barring a miraculous comeback, this will be the 2nd 1st round exit in a row. What should we do next?
Re-tool. A lot of this will occur anyway this summer - a coaching change is a given (hopefully). Luongo will be moved, Ballard and/or Booth should be bought out, and we have a lot of expiring contracts in Roy, Raymond, Malhotra, Lapierre, Pinizzotto, Alberts and Barker. We also have some RFAs to make decisions on in Weise, Sestito, Tanev and Joslin.
At the moment, next year's team looks like this;
D. Sedin - H. Sedin - Burrows
Higgins - Kesler - Hansen
???? - ???? - Kassian
???? - ???? - ????
Hamhuis - Garrison
Edler - Bieksa
Corrado - Tanev
Schneider
????
- With the emergence of Corrado and Tanev on the back end as viable everyday defenseman, we should explore moving one of our defenseman for help in our top-six. Edler is the likeliest candidate, IMO. If we could somehow package Edler and our first for a high draft pick to have a shot at a guy like Drouin, I would be ecstatic.
- Free agency needs to be utilized to build depth. Our fourth line is abhorrent, and needs a major upgrade. Guys like Dale Weise and Tom Sestito are not cutting it. It's clear you need to have four lines that can play, and we don't.
- Make the right call on a coach. Get somebody who will let some of your young guys play through their hiccups.
Let the Sedins walk when their contract is up, they won't ever get traded, and if they were they wouldnt return much.
I'd keep them around until they retire. However, they'll have to be open to accepting a cut in pay and a reduced role. They can no longer be relied on, especially in the playoffs.
I'd keep them around until they retire. However, they'll have to be open to accepting a cut in pay and a reduced role. They can no longer be relied on, especially in the playoffs.
I'd keep them around until they retire. However, they'll have to be open to accepting a cut in pay and a reduced role.
Everyone suggesting trading the Sedins' tell me which team has 12.2 million in cap space just lying around?
Bieksa needs to go before Edler
Wrong on both counts. Ehrhoff wanted 5x5.5, and Gillis countered with Bieksa money.
It wasn't until after his rights were traded to Buffalo that he was offered that contract. Nice try on the revisionist history though.
Choosing Ehrhoff over Bieksa is among the more Pejorative Slured decisions any Canuck GM has ever made, along with the Neely trade imo.
Torres wanted 2 years and Gillis only offered 1.
In both instances Gillis went full Pejorative Slur. You never go full Pejorative Slur.
Trade Edler for a young RH D or young forward before his NTC kicks in. He's the only "big piece" the Canucks can really consider moving. The Sedins and Kesler are untouchable and the rest of the valuable D already have NTCs.