TL;DR - Yank Smith, go back to old school play the hot hand (Rittich till he cools off). However, I wouldn't get hasty about looking for a replacement for Smith.
I actually am slightly optimistic that Smith can bounce back, but that involves yanking him. Riding pine should help with the clarity and have him possibly heal up if he is dealing with something. Let's sew some mesh into him. Sew some into Gilles and Parsons too. Less stupid memes wise, I think a lot of the issue is between the head. Smith is letting in squeakers which means he's mostly there, but carelessness is mucking things off. He's not completely off, IMO he's just slightly mis calibrated. That looks like a potential bounce back candidate to me. However, if the rumor is true that he's throwing the team under the bus, then it's good to make him ride pine anyways.
Acquiring a goalie right now may not be the best idea unless both the acquisition cost and cap work out. Why? Salary cap. Smith's cap hit is 5.67 AAV, but Coyotes are retaining 25%. I seem to recall that we had a discussion about the potential of bonuses eating next year's cap. If we are sitting on 4.25 AAV + 800K, we better be careful because we're barely spending on goal tending at the moment. Many teams are spending much more than the 5 Mil AAV on a single goalie than we are in a tandem and pushing that AAV up this season could potentially have domino implications on salary negotiations with RFAs as well as other random cap crunch and penalties.
A new goalie isn't necessarily going to work out or go hot then cold like crazy. I once pointed out Sigalet, that bandwagon has cooled. I (and I guess others) still am not totally sure if Sigalet is a true problem, but he's definitely a common denominator along side some of the major hot and cold spells for the goalies. Yet, many of the guys we had were flawed from the get go.
- Hiller was good first year, then horribad.
- Ramo was inconsistent, but as soon as he started looking decent, his knee was GG'd. (Ok under Marlarchuk, Good first year, destroyed second year)
- Elliott was decent but already had major complaints in St Louis, then collapsed major in the ploffs. Some of his attitude was also perhaps the reason we didn't keep him. (Cold, hot, cold, hot, cold)
- Johnson was similar too with his up and down seasons, so he was a bit of a traveling back up for a while. (Meh, hot, meh, rode pine due to injury?)
- I'm not sure about Ortio, but I bet attitude was an issue if he packed his bags and went home (though it wasn't good that he was in a goalie carousel).
- Smith was good last year, but we rode him too hard and he broke. I'm thinking he's still broken, but too damn proud to admit it. However, hasn't he's had the best stretch of all the goalies we've had since Kipper? (Good first year, bad second year)
- Rittich/Ortio - Thrown to the wolves and didn't survive last season. Rittich looking good this season, but I think management doesn't want to rush him. Unsure about Gilles.
I mean, a saving grace is that Peters is used to getting teams to play decent and overcome poor goal tending... Hot goalie or legit starter? Watch out!