Qward
Because! That's why!
Tkachuk, Chabot and 3rd overall are our only untouchables. If there is no deal no hard feelings.To be honest, I don't see anyone other than BT making it work...
Tkachuk, Chabot and 3rd overall are our only untouchables. If there is no deal no hard feelings.To be honest, I don't see anyone other than BT making it work...
No deal my friend: Ekblad and Barky are untouchables Sometimes untouchables are traded for untouchablesTkachuk, Chabot and 3rd overall are our only untouchables. If there is no deal no hard feelings.
Issue is cap-space: JT and AM are signed 22.6; for the next two seasons Barky+AM=17.5M. That's a good second line wing differenceBut do you really want to fall into the same mistake of having 2 first line centers that are being paid as such like Toronto is currently going through?
Our top C prospects are Logan Brown and Josh Norris. I would rate Batherson above both which is why I put him up.
I think it would be incredible to have Chabot/Ekblad top pairing, I would understand why Florida would want to keep him above all else.
TOR would be the last team I'd hope our new GM trades him to.
You dont trade prime aged RD with 5 years left. Unless it's for a Matthews type player aka an overpay
1. should consider value of self rental retained production vs market return
2. market return would be top dollar and selling high should not be dismissed
3. Matthews would not happen. Conceivable packages, but Matthews not clear as a return.
4. Marner should be rejected UNLESS at a hair under 11 Leafs eat almost 4 reducing him to 7 for an extended term.
5. Leafs want RD are in win now mode.
Stalman reduced 5+ to 4 + Ekblad full pop + Panthers + Avalanche 2020 3rds
for
Marner reduced to 7 + Liljigren + Pens 2020 1st
something like that.
Also, if 5OA is on the table, FL should def grab it, esp if there is a +.
If you are hell bent on immediate help now, 5OA can buy a lot of immediate help.
1. should consider value of self rental retained production vs market return
2. market return would be top dollar and selling high should not be dismissed
3. Matthews would not happen. Conceivable packages, but Matthews not clear as a return.
4. Marner should be rejected UNLESS at a hair under 11 Leafs eat almost 4 reducing him to 7 for an extended term.
5. Leafs want RD are in win now mode.
Stalman reduced 5+ to 4 + Ekblad full pop + Panthers + Avalanche 2020 3rds
for
Marner reduced to 7 + Liljigren + Pens 2020 1st
something like that.
Also, if 5OA is on the table, FL should def grab it, esp if there is a +.
If you are hell bent on immediate help now, 5OA can buy a lot of immediate help.
Nah. Marner isn't it Bern.
We aren't trading Ekblad, that deals helps TOR more than it helps FLA
Enjoy your weekend though amigo
I agree, but still we need to consider replacement cost: Replacing Ek is super expensive.1. should consider value of self rental retained production vs market return
2. market return would be top dollar and selling high should not be dismissed
3. Matthews would not happen. Conceivable packages, but Matthews not clear as a return.
4. Marner should be rejected UNLESS at a hair under 11 Leafs eat almost 4 reducing him to 7 for an extended term.
5. Leafs want RD are in win now mode.
Stalman reduced 5+ to 4 + Ekblad full pop + Panthers + Avalanche 2020 3rds
for
Marner reduced to 7 + Liljigren + Pens 2020 1st
something like that.
Also, if 5OA is on the table, FL should def grab it, esp if there is a +.
If you are hell bent on immediate help now, 5OA can buy a lot of immediate help.
Nah. Marner isn't it Bern.
We aren't trading Ekblad, that deals helps TOR more than it helps FLA
Enjoy your weekend though amigo
Laine would look sharp next to Barkov
And Ekblad would look great next to Jomo
I agree, but still we need to consider replacement cost: Replacing Ek is super expensive.
Marner is someone who could make sense if we could replace.
Just do what the jets did. Get a vezina calibre goalie, ahl defense, and try to score 7 lolI bet he would but our defense would allow 6 goals a game. We've suffered enough.
Ekblad is untouchable and for good reason.
Just do what the jets did. Get a vezina calibre goalie, ahl defense, and try to score 7 lol
Most people are. It's just what we would take for our asset
Young talent like Ekblad who is happy and team controlled are only really traded in hockey trades (usually 1:1) that makes the trading team presumably better. Given Florida's dearth of D..
What's wrong with that proposal ? Debrusk is a 23 yr old almost 30 goal guy and vak is a future dman stud our best prospect plus zboril a former 1st round player young dman just finding his game nowYikes
The trade we'd be game for is something like Huby for LaineLaine would look sharp next to Barkov
And Ekblad would look great next to Jomo
Lateral move for the Jets. We need a 2C and/or RHD.The trade we'd be game for is something like Huby for Laine