Soundgarden
#164303
Yeah, I think it was definitely a behind the scenes issue with Ingram. No other reason to trade a goalie who was playing well and was drafted fairly high so quickly.
Yes, but if he was highly regarded, they would have been able to move him for a 3rd. Or a 4th even. Etc. They didn't trade him to us for a 7th just out of the kindness of their hearts. Nobody else wanted him.His behavior was the reason the Lightning moved him. Perhaps it has changed but there has never been a question of his potential.
He's still only 20, which makes it even more impressive. Unless he's deadset on playing all 4 years, I think you have to sign him as soon as his season ends and give him his cameo a la Fabbro, at the very least.Is David Farrance on this team after his season at BU? He is leading college hockey defenseman in a slew of categories including points. He is not as defensively sound as Fabbro coming out, but is much more polished offensively. I could see him leaping a few guys for chance at bottom pair next year.
This is true however goalies do not return much when traded or for that matter they are not drafted high either. Ingram was drafted in the 3rd round as a back-up plan for Vasi who like Pekka was anointed to be the starter his second year in North America. Heck they Moved Ben Bishop to give VAsi the starting spot. So like you say he was not a hot commodity and with the issues the organization had they just moved him for any asset.Yes, but if he was highly regarded, they would have been able to move him for a 3rd. Or a 4th even. Etc. They didn't trade him to us for a 7th just out of the kindness of their hearts. Nobody else wanted him.
Is David Farrance on this team after his season at BU? He is leading college hockey defenseman in a slew of categories including points. He is not as defensively sound as Fabbro coming out, but is much more polished offensively. I could see him leaping a few guys for chance at bottom pair next year.
That's waaaaay too harsh a judgement on Saros. This is the first time in the last 7 years that he has shown any signs whatsoever of faltering. I don't think one bad half-season in the midst of an overall team meltdown is enough that we should consider throwing away the previous 6 years of consistent and excellent progress Saros showed. He's where he is and got the contract he got for very good reasons; he earned it. Now he faces the challenge of his first real adversity along the way. It's premature to write him off at 24, given his accomplishments thus far.This is true however goalies do not return much when traded or for that matter they are not drafted high either. Ingram was drafted in the 3rd round as a back-up plan for Vasi who like Pekka was anointed to be the starter his second year in North America. Heck they Moved Ben Bishop to give VAsi the starting spot. So like you say he was not a hot commodity and with the issues the organization had they just moved him for any asset.
I still think he could become a starter in the league in a couple years but at 22 he needs at least one more year in the AHL. Failure to do so puts him on the same path that Saro's has went thru. The Preds burned valuable time with Saro's and while he has been on a NHL roster full time for 4 years the games he has missed can not be made up and he will probably be out of the league in two or three years. I hope they can be patient with Ingram and at least give him a fighting chance to come up at age 24 and see what happens. Does he deserve a few games in this abortion of a season sure give him a taste and show him the team wants him but give him enough time and games to make a difference when he does make the jump.
But for all I promote those guys like Dillon/Edmundson/Gudas, I just feel that's not really Poile's philosophy. So I can wish for it, but I would expect he goes instead with more mobile/cheaper internal options, which ought to open the door for some number of our prospects... throw Farrance, Davies, Allard, Carrier on the ice in camp and see who takes spots, basically. Farrance should come to camp in that scenario thinking he has every chance to make the team.
If could actually get 2 of those guys I listed... well, from my armchair I'd probably do it and hang the prospects. Make them wait until expansion re-opens a spot. But really, who is going to be able to sign 2 of a kind in the same UFA Frenzy window? It's not practical to expect that. Just hit them all with offers and count yourself lucky if even one of them signs.I'd really like to see one veteran physical D get signed this offseason and then leave one other spot open for one of our prospects. We've got Tinordi next season as well who has shown to me recently that he can be a decent 7D so I'd keep him up and in the pressbox most of the team while rotating prospects out of the sixth D spot. I have this strange feeling that we are going to re-sign Weber and not really address our need for size on the back end though.
Exactly. We have to go hard after one of the solid UFA D. I think you'd find that Gudas and Dillon are probably the most physical options. We need physicality back there. Edmundson also has size and is pretty solid, but I find he doesn't go out of his way to hit quite like those other two. For any of them, they may not have flashy stats, but I would guess the bidding starts around 4x$4M... and goes up subject to demand from there. So it's not going to be a pretty contract. But I think we just need it so bad we have to chase them anyway.I believe Gudas is a free agent, RHD.
Josi - Fabbro
Ekholm - Ellis
Farrance - Gudas
Tinordi
I think Fabbro has been good this season, rookie mistakes sure, but still fine for his position. Another offseason of training and conditioning, plus a full training camp for the entire D-corps under Hynes should bring him up a notch.
if Farrance isn't ready, which he might not be, perhaps Davies is the one to make the jump, or we go for another veteran D. Gudas can also take 2nd pair minutes at times, which gives a lot of flexibility on the right side.
Gudas or whoever, I'm fully on board with ditching Irwin/Hamhuis/Weber this off-season and bringing back the top-4, Carrier and Tinordi. Sign a veteran defenseman over the summer and you have a solid defense next year.
Whether it is Carrier, Davies or Farrance making the jump to the big league, it doesn't really matter. I just think Carrier is the furthest in development among those guys.
Realistically, I think it's common enough to carry 8D in the modern NHL. Tinordi as the big/tough spare and Carrier as the PMD style guy could BOTH be placed in #7/8 roles. The new Irwin/Weber. Then we roll the starting 6 as...Agreed Carrier is the furthest along, but in my mind he has the lowest ceiling. Not entirely a deal breaker for 3rd line minutes, but I like the idea of letting them battle it out for a spot and see where it goes.
His behavior was the reason the Lightning moved him. Perhaps it has changed but there has never been a question of his potential.
It sounds like they knew full well "what he was unhappy about" and opted to back some minor league ringleaders on his team or prioritize their internal perception of off-ice attitudes over on-ice performance. Their loss. Well, 30 other teams loss too since basically anybody could have picked him up for a 6th round pick.I appreciate that people who are 23 or 24 don't always exhibit the best judgement and behavior. I have observed that first hand at work. TBL could have asked him what he was unhappy about rather than exiling him to the ECHL. They goofed up big time. Their loss was Nashville's gain.
Are Santini and Davies both playing regularly in Milwaukee? If so how do they look? I'm guessing Santini isnt part of our plans going forward, but I thought Poile was pretty high on Davies
Are Santini and Davies both playing regularly in Milwaukee? If so how do they look? I'm guessing Santini isnt part of our plans going forward, but I thought Poile was pretty high on Davies
Sweet job by both referees tonight watching Dillon Heatherington hold Tanner Jeannot’s stick for several seconds while he tries to retrieve a puck from the corner, not calling it and then having the puck end up in the Admirals net 20 seconds later.