- Aug 25, 2006
- 9,512
- 7,675
Not concerned. I bet the deal is already agreed between the two parties. just waiting for the XD to be over.
That’s a 1/3 buyout and Bowers would get a top line spot. Win. Win. Win.Don’t forget to buyout Mikko
You gotta sign your core players. Plain and simple. Manage the cap, deal with contract term when players decline, find solutions. You can’t always pre-emptively protect your cap for 3 years down the road.
Don’t forget to buyout Mikko
50 mil over 7 or 8 years (this last preferred) would be my highest offer considering the current flat cap and what RNH gotIm not someone that really wants to give landy a big deal. However, obviously most do. So my question at what point do you let him walk? Just for argument sake we will say he gets 7 years. What per year amount would you say its just too much?
Oh so he’s at his house.Landeskog spotted in Canada via Instagram, confirmed signing in Canadian market??? E4 to Toronto???
Last 3 seasons 5v5. Top line with Landy xGF% 57.57%. Mikko and Nate without Landy xGF% 48.42%. Make no mistake, he’s critical to that line clicking and would be very hard to replace.
They’ve each had stretches, but the data and eye test is clear the line completes with Landy on it. Without him, it takes a large step back. It would be a challenge to replace Landy.I think this is expected. The drop off between Landy and whoever else would’ve been up there over the years is significant.
I know MacKinnon and Rantanen have also piled up plenty of points when Landeskog’s been out of the lineup though. MacK had one of the best stretches of his career when Landeskog was injured two years ago.
They’ve each had stretches, but the data and eye test is clear the line completes with Landy on it. Without him, it takes a large step back. It would be a challenge to replace Landy.
Edmonton. Had a dream about it. Its only a matter of time.Landeskog spotted in Canada via Instagram, confirmed signing in Canadian market??? E4 to Toronto???
He’s not a blank check guy, but the Avs should be willing to pay market for him (or any core player). I don’t see how they could spend a combo of money under 8m and improve the team in ufa. Trades will cost future assets making it more difficult down the road.I agree.
Losing Landeskog would mean saying goodbye to the best line in hockey imo.
I don’t think it would cripple the team though. You can’t bring in a player as good as Landeskog, but you could off-set a lot of what he brought by balancing out the lineup.
He’s just not a blank cheque kind of player and that’s part of what’s going to be hard with this negotiation.
I want him back, but the Avs should have a limit.
I agree.
Losing Landeskog would mean saying goodbye to the best line in hockey imo.
I don’t think it would cripple the team though. You can’t bring in a player as good as Landeskog, but you could off-set a lot of what he brought by balancing out the lineup.
He’s just not a blank cheque kind of player and that’s part of what’s going to be hard with this negotiation.
I want him back, but the Avs should have a limit.
He’s not a blank check guy, but the Avs should be willing to pay market for him (or any core player). I don’t see how they could spend a combo of money under 8m and improve the team in ufa. Trades will cost future assets making it more difficult down the road.
EJ or Makar.Here’s an “IF” question given the title of the thread:
IF Landeskog does leave, who ends up as Captain of the team?
I’m saying replacing Landy will be more costly than paying him. Either short term in lesser players and more dollars. Long term in assets. Or a combo of both.Trades cost assets, but you actually need the cap space to get players back in trades.
I wouldn’t like to see him go, but $8M is not a number I would touch in this market.
Mackinnon unless he outright refuses it. I dont wanna do anything to piss him off a few years away from free agency. If I had it my way Makar would be captain.Here’s an “IF” question given the title of the thread:
IF Landeskog does leave, who ends up as Captain of the team?
Here’s an “IF” question given the title of the thread:
IF Landeskog does leave, who ends up as Captain of the team?
Well...if he is at his house during a critical time like this obviously he doesn't care about the team and especially the fans so let him walk.Oh so he’s at his house.
Here’s an “IF” question given the title of the thread:
IF Landeskog does leave, who ends up as Captain of the team?