Speculation: Ian Mitchell

featherhawk

Registered User
Dec 13, 2006
14,278
5,008
when this website last went down for maintenance the changes were absolutely horrendous

and it has very little to do with the double posting

after I type the message and hit post rely it takes so bloody long to post the damn thing its ridiculous.
 

SimpleJack

Registered User
Jul 25, 2013
6,537
4,213
when this website last went down for maintenance the changes were absolutely horrendous

and it has very little to do with the double posting

after I type the message and hit post rely it takes so bloody long to post the damn thing its ridiculous.

Seriously. They’ve gotta do something about the long wait after clicking the reply button. And soon.
 

featherhawk

Registered User
Dec 13, 2006
14,278
5,008
Seriously. They’ve gotta do something about the long wait after clicking the reply button. And soon.

Ya it is absolutely terrible. I will time it.


33.86 seconds as timed on my phone from the time I hit post reply till the time it posted...

I am not an IT genius by any stretch but even I know that is unacceptable from a time perspective...

Never used a site that took so long.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bwana63

Putt Pirate

Registered User
Dec 15, 2015
5,310
3,059
Ya it is absolutely terrible. I will time it.


33.86 seconds as timed on my phone from the time I hit post reply till the time it posted...

I am not an IT genius by any stretch but even I know that is unacceptable from a time perspective...

Never used a site that took so long.

They are more worried about getting more pop ups on your screen.
 

bwana63

carter blanche
Jul 11, 2014
5,397
4,339
Chi western burbs
Ya it is absolutely terrible. I will time it.


33.86 seconds as timed on my phone from the time I hit post reply till the time it posted...

I am not an IT genius by any stretch but even I know that is unacceptable from a time perspective...

Never used a site that took so long.

+1

Not interested in getting banned from another site, so am going to hold back. Needless to say, this platform's performance is poor. Upgrade? What upgrade?
 

Taze em

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
8,382
656
All excited about Mitchell and then the week's story on Chiclets was Perunovich signing to the Blues and will be a Makar Neidermayer type. Fuuuuuuuuu
 

CallMeShaft

Calder Bedard Fan
Apr 14, 2014
15,960
21,827
All excited about Mitchell and then the week's story on Chiclets was Perunovich signing to the Blues and will be a Makar Neidermayer type. Fuuuuuuuuu
He's 5ft9, so there is real serious bust potential there.

And he doesn't really play the style the Blues play, so who knows if he'll ever stick there.
 

ColbyChaos

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
6,231
6,536
Will County
He's 5ft9, so there is real serious bust potential there.

And he doesn't really play the style the Blues play, so who knows if he'll ever stick there.

They also have the Faulk contract to deal with, sign Pietrangelo, Dunn, and their other RFAs the next two offseasons, he is going to be squeezed out at that point most likely.
 

RayP

Tf
Jan 12, 2011
94,109
17,878
They also have the Faulk contract to deal with, sign Pietrangelo, Dunn, and their other RFAs the next two offseasons, he is going to be squeezed out at that point most likely.

I swear I remember reading somewhere that there is a good chance Pietrangelo ends up elsewhere.
 

Hattrick Kane

Registered User
Oct 8, 2018
9,106
13,288
I swear I remember reading somewhere that there is a good chance Pietrangelo ends up elsewhere.
Armstrong should be fired if he lets Pietrangelo walk.

You buyout Steen, trade Bozak and Perron or even Faulk before you cripple the defense like that.

I just can’t understand the logic of letting your number 1 defenseman walk. You want to close your cup contending years real quick, that’s how.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RememberTheRoar

Kaners Bald Spot

Registered User
Dec 6, 2011
22,704
10,812
Kane County, IL
Armstrong should be fired if he lets Pietrangelo walk.

You buyout Steen, trade Bozak and Perron or even Faulk before you cripple the defense like that.

I just can’t understand the logic of letting your number 1 defenseman walk. You want to close your cup contending years real quick, that’s how.
If they think he's another Seabrook waiting to happen, it's the right move. And let's face it, bigger D are more likely to be a Seabrook in their 30s than a Pronger. 3 years from now letting Pietrangelo walk could seem like a genius move.

Would you have been upset if the Hawks let Seabrook walk in 2016 or traded him coming off of a cup in 2015? Of course not, everyone knew that was bad the moment that it was signed. Pietrangelo will be 30 this year so it's not a crazy move. It's more likely than not they got his best years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pertti

Kevin Musto

Hard for Bedard
Feb 16, 2018
21,363
27,778
If they think he's another Seabrook waiting to happen, it's the right move. And let's face it, bigger D are more likely to be a Seabrook in their 30s than a Pronger. 3 years from now letting Pietrangelo walk could seem like a genius move.

Would you have been upset if the Hawks let Seabrook walk in 2016 or traded him coming off of a cup in 2015? Of course not, everyone knew that was bad the moment that it was signed. Pietrangelo will be 30 this year so it's not a crazy move. It's more likely than not they got his best years.
Just don't sign players to monster contracts.

Seabrook was 8 years at $6,875,000 per year. If that were 8 years at $4,500,000 we wouldn't be complaining about it all the time.

The current cap hit would even be fine if it were at 6 years instead.

Just don't be irresponsible when handing out contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad