zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
If you turn out to be right in what you have been saying I'll buy you a beer and admit i was wrong
Still, 3 games
his productivity has been super duper elite for a lot longer than 3gms.
If you turn out to be right in what you have been saying I'll buy you a beer and admit i was wrong
Still, 3 games
This is what I have been saying.
He’s one of the top 5v5 players in terms of points per 60.
Now he’s going to get top powerplay minutes on a stacked unit?
It’d be insane to not acknowledge him as a candidate for the Art Ross
What a kick in the **** for Coyotes fans. Missed out on McDavid and Matthews.
Toews career high is higher than Matthews career high... I wonder which one is more unlikely.
He is going to win it.8 points through 3 games. Doesn’t even have Nylander back yet. Anyone watching him can see how much more dangerous he looked this year.
Just my opinion. Where do you see him finishing in the Art Ross race. Let me know!
He is scoring 50 this year and Tavares hits 40.
Ready to be bumped at year end.
Yes of course. We just have to see if it increases linerally with ice time and usagehis productivity has been super duper elite for a lot longer than 3gms.
Then you're not watching.I don't even expect him to lead his team in points
The way I see it, Toews has a PPG of 0.86, while Matthews has a PPG of 0.95.
Given what we know of their usage, it seems clear that Matthews is the better candidate.
Yes of course. We just have to see if it increases linerally with ice time and usage
Yes of course. We just have to see if it increases linerally with ice time and usage
I'm sure you didn't mind it when there was those negative Matthews thread on the main board, like the one about him not wearing an A on his jersey.
If threads like that can be posted in order to take shots at them, I don't mind it when a positive thread likes this is also posted.For every negative Leafs thread, there’s another premature thread, like this one.
It’s funny, in the “Do the Leafs have the worst defence” you’re quick to say that it’s premature but there’s no objection in this thread. Color me shocked.
If threads like that can be posted in order to take shots at them, I don't mind it when a positive thread likes this is also posted.
Matthews played 2 seasons in the NHL and only one full season, it’s a weird way to compare them. It’s your opinion though.
Oh for sure that makes it worse.And they drafted Strome.
You’ve missed the point completely.
If one thread is premature, this is premature too. At least be consistent.
Just like the thread about Matthews not wearing an A was posted without Babcock's full comment where he still called him a leader, yet all the Leafs haters didn't mind that topic being on here. So don't tell me about being consistent.You’ve missed the point completely.
If one thread is premature, this is premature too. At least be consistent.
Please take your fan base to fan base arguing elsewhere. This thread is for legitimate discussion about a top young star being a candidate for an award.
Much like the discussion earlier in the week about Evgeni Kuznetsov on the same topic.
Toews career high is higher than Matthews career high... I wonder which one is more unlikely.
Uh, no. I won’t.
It’s just as dumb as a premature hot take as the “Do the Leafs have the worst defence?” Thread.
It’s three ****ing games.